Linux - HardwareThis forum is for Hardware issues.
Having trouble installing a piece of hardware? Want to know if that peripheral is compatible with Linux?
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Introduction to Linux - A Hands on Guide
This guide was created as an overview of the Linux Operating System, geared toward new users as an exploration tour and getting started guide, with exercises at the end of each chapter.
For more advanced trainees it can be a desktop reference, and a collection of the base knowledge needed to proceed with system and network administration. This book contains many real life examples derived from the author's experience as a Linux system and network administrator, trainer and consultant. They hope these examples will help you to get a better understanding of the Linux system and that you feel encouraged to try out things on your own.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free.
I'm trying to put a 160-gig SATA and an 80-gig IDE drive in eeh same box. if both were IDE my 160 would be my primary master, my 80 would be my primary slave. However, my 160 SATA drive does not show in my BIOS, (it does seem to be working though, on a mepis live disc) I don't know how to configure the whole master/salve business between the two drives. Should my 80-gig IDE drive be set as my IDE primary master or slave?
Thanks. I hope I wrote the question clear enough :S
I swear it makes no mention of my SATA disc! If I go to change my boot order, it only list my IDE primarya nd secondary masters and slaves. The only indication of how the SATA disc is functioning is little printing on the mobo below the SATA headers. I suspect the BIOS doesn't address it because the mobo is the deluxe version, perhaps the regluar version does not support SATA and they just didn't make a better BIOS for hte deluxe?
Also thanks lenard for the tip. I was beginning to suspect that, but ti's nice to confirm it with someone.
Jumpers- there is a jumper setting for "enable" and 'disable" of SATA, I had that enabled this whole time.
BIOS version- I'm not sure what version number or whatever I have. I really would prefer not to flash it. it's "Phoenix AwardBIOS"
Advanced BIOS- "boot other device" is [enabled]
I tried entering the "RAID setup utility" that it prompts for during boot. The RAID utility does see the disc and correctly identify it.
here's the real problem though. i want windoze and mepis booting from this disc. mepis will install to it, but the windows installer will not recognize it. ;( Another quality microsoft product.
A friend of mine tells me XP just doesn't come with RAID drivers. i need a floppy with the RAID driver on it so that i can install ti when prompter during XP installation. probably a bit more complicated than that, but I think I'm on the right track.
You need the number of the bios. It should be shown as you boot the computer. It may be that you have one of the older versions of the bios. If that is the case, your either flash or live with the situation. It is not that the older versions of the bios cannot use sata, it is that they cannot use them correctly.