It's no problem, I have had to set up several linux servers with hardware raids before, LSI and 3ware (who are now owned by LSI...). I have also seen a host/fake(adaptec) raid, software raid and on one occasion an embedded raid, hardware raid always gives just a normal device where the other three all seem to give mapped devices on top of showing individual devices in /dev/ for mapped devices and all hard drives.
I should have put earlier, the reason for this is that with hardware raid, the raid controller is on the raid card itself and all raid processing is handled by the raid controller. On the other hand for software, embedded and host/fake there is no hardware raid controller and the raid processing is passed on to the CPU. There maybe mobos with hardware raid controllers on them but I am yet to see them, if they ever come around, hardware embedded raid would be some what nice. however given that most decent hardware raid cards seem to cost as much, if not more then most mid-high end motherboards...
anyways, naturally due to the way Hardware Raid works, it's a lot more efficient as it adds no real additional load to the CPU and gives the best performance ratings. I would advise myself, to only ever use Hardware or Software raid, host/fake has caused me issues in the passed is not really any better then software raid, I generally haven't dealt with embedded raid but it's effectively the same as host/fake raid.
Last edited by r3sistance; 01-25-2010 at 03:07 PM.
|