Linux - HardwareThis forum is for Hardware issues.
Having trouble installing a piece of hardware? Want to know if that peripheral is compatible with Linux?
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Here's the thing, I like GUIs on an OS. I'm not ashamed to say it.
I like to see what's doing. As of late, I have been messing around with 3 versions of RH w/ GNOME and KDE. I found response times to be slow when working w/ these GUIs. I tried speeding up my hard drives settings, but still no good. I am using:
AMD 350mhz
U66 IDE hard drive, don't know the RPM.
160meg PC100 mem
4x CDrom
It's hard to find info on what people are using to run these GUIs properly. However, I do read that people are having slowness problems alot. I had the opportunity to test Redhat 7.3 w/ a full workstation install last night on a rather powerful low end server.
Here what it has:
First off, it loaded the full WS install in 21 minutes. Apps opened in 1 second flat. Netscape took 2 seconds, where as it took 18 seconds w/ the 350mzh system. I found that GNOME ran just a tiny bit faster than KDE, but both still ran fast!
I did a hdparm on he subsystem- 128meg in .55 seconds!!!
Unfortunately, it's not my machine to keep.
Seeing this example of speed has really inspired me to move directly into Redhat Linux instead of Win 2k Pro.
Hope this info helps to give some of you new guys an idea of what's up.
It's well known issue with GNOME/KDE - they're hugest memory hogs, espacially on low-power machines. Than there is a hardware factor, SCSI drives are fast, then DDR memory is as twice faster than PC100/133 SDRAM, and CPU's you have 350 Mhz and the monster is running off 1.22 GHz (dual CPU configuration doesn't mean your processor speed is doubled, but the CPU time is utilized much better then a single processor configuration this is only true if the program is designed to optimize/utilize whatever SMP (symmetric multi-processing) can offer), so here you have to suffer unless you opt for a lightweight windowmanager like flux/blackbox, WindowMaker, Xfce, etc.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.