Linux - HardwareThis forum is for Hardware issues.
Having trouble installing a piece of hardware? Want to know if that peripheral is compatible with Linux?
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Is any deficiency detectable, from below outputs, of my GTX680 graphic card on debian amd64, main board GA-X79-UD3? To justify the error shown below when trying to run a simulation with namd3 (https://www.ks.uiuc.edu/Research/namd/alpha/3.0alpha/)
Quote:
root@gig64:/home/francesco# lspci | grep -i --color 'vga\|3d\|2d'
02:00.0 VGA compatible controller: NVIDIA Corporation GK104 [GeForce GTX 680] (rev a1)
root@gig64:/home/francesco# lspci -v -s 02:0.0
02:00.0 VGA compatible controller: NVIDIA Corporation GK104 [GeForce GTX 680] (rev a1) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller])
Subsystem: Micro-Star International Co., Ltd. [MSI] GK104 [GeForce GTX 680]
Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 0, IRQ 50
Memory at fa000000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=16M]
Memory at f0000000 (64-bit, prefetchable) [size=128M]
Memory at f8000000 (64-bit, prefetchable) [size=32M]
I/O ports at e000 [size=128]
Expansion ROM at 000c0000 [virtual] [disabled] [size=128K]
Capabilities: [60] Power Management version 3
Capabilities: [68] MSI: Enable+ Count=1/1 Maskable- 64bit+
Capabilities: [78] Express Endpoint, MSI 00
Capabilities: [b4] Vendor Specific Information: Len=14 <?>
Capabilities: [100] Virtual Channel
Capabilities: [128] Power Budgeting <?>
Capabilities: [600] Vendor Specific Information: ID=0001 Rev=1 Len=024 <?>
Kernel driver in use: nvidia
Kernel modules: nvidia
Quote:
NVIDIA-SMI 470.199.02 Driver Version: 470.199.02 CUDA Version: 11.4
Quote:
namd3 heat-01.conf +p6 +idlepoll 2>&1 | tee trial_12Dec2023_heat-01.log
FATAL ERROR: CUDA error cufftPlan3d(&forwardPlan, n[2], n[1], n[0], CUFFT_R2C) in file src/CudaPmeSolverUtil.C, function plan3D
on Pe 0 (gig64 device 0 pci 0:2:0)
Further question: is any free software to check independently the performance of this graphic card?
Wild shot in the dark: does that application require a newer version of CUDA than the GTX 680 (which is quite old, and in your case also running a relatively quite old driver) supports? There are different features added in newer versions of CUDA so if it needs something that the GTX 680 cannot do, it may not handle that gracefully. I poked around on the linked site for a minute or two and couldn't find clearly outlined system requirements, but NVIDIA has a page about NAMD which lists Pascal (GTX 1000 series) as the minimum requirement for an x86_64 instance (see here: https://catalog.ngc.nvidia.com/orgs/hpc/containers/namd).
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.