Linux - HardwareThis forum is for Hardware issues.
Having trouble installing a piece of hardware? Want to know if that peripheral is compatible with Linux?
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
My system has a 2100+ (1733Mhz) CPU and I have the opportunity to trade it for a dual 1600+(1400Mhz) (tyan tiger mobo) system. the rest of the system is the same (512MB DDR, GF4 128MB...)
Should I do it? I guess it would compile faster, but overall, will it perform better?
AFAIK, trading up for a dual-cpu will not give you a (virtual) 2800mhz machine, but you will be able to multitask better...ie compiling code on one cpu, and watching a movie at the same time, with both running at 1400mhz
If you like to do a lot of cpu intensive things at the same time, then this may be a good option...however, if you only do 1-2 things at a time, and they are not cpu bound tasks, performance increase may not be as great as you expect. (if any)
Distribution: slackware 9.1, redhat 9.0, PHLAK, SuSE 9.0Pro windows XP (HEAVILY MODIFIED)
Posts: 111
Rep:
i have the exact same processor as you and i was playing doom3 and comparing my freinds dual 2000+ and its not faster at all try clocking your freinds or whoever your trading with and see whos is faster try a 3D MARK program
but like bulliver said if your doing alot of multitasking do it if you just want the performance dont do it
Doom 3 doesn't support dual processing, ID stopped supporting dual processing with Quake3 (you had to enter the command r_smp 1 in the console), it was causing more problems than anything.
But I don't play games anymore (except for GTA:SA on PS2). Do apps need to be written to use the second CPU or is it all nicely handle by the smp kernel?
I have a Tyan tiger mb with a pair of 1200's, and I wouldn't want to go back to a single proc system anymore. It is nice being able to compile something or tame a runaway process while not loosing responsiveness on your desktop. Apps that aren't multi-threaded won't make use of the second proc. My only concern is that your ram, video card and power supply are compatable with the new mb, assuming you keep yours.
What I read, if the kernel is compiled with SMP support, it will try to balance the system load on two processors. What I read you can run a program or service on a certain processor. You can make a CD on one processor and the other playing a game. Programs like mplayerxp has good support for for multi-processor systems. You can run setiathome on each computer or run folding@home in smp mode.
If you have a slow hard drive, as always it going to be the bottleneck. You may want to setup RAID 1 to speed up the accessing performance.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.