Linux - GeneralThis Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I learned long ago in my Linux use that Debian is a favorite among programmers and distro designers. Even if I hadn't read this, I could have figured it out, with the great number of distros based on Debian. It just occurred to me that I don't actually know why. What characteristics in Debian appeal to designers? I've tried it a few times but only briefly.
I can't very well answer for everyone but from what I've seeen, Debian tends to favor stability over having the latest and greatest of functionalities built into OS. As someone who frequently changes distros (because why not) I've noticed that (for the most part) Debian will very rarley break due to updates/upgrades whereas other, particularly bleeeding edge distros, seem to be break more often. Just my two cents
It obviously depends on circumstances. Most distros based on Debian use the Unstable version; for them, the attraction is the size of the repository. As for programers, if they are employees, they use what they're given; if they are freelance, they use what gives the least trouble, so the Stable version will appeal. Years ago, Linus said he liked Ubuntu (pre-Unity days!) because it just worked: he wanted to use his computer, not tinker with it.
I'm not often a programer (although the other day I did find myself removing an obscure bug in an undocumented program I'd written around 1990!) but I hate Debian because I find it so fiddly to configure and it only comes with 3-years' support — hence CentOS and Salix.
There are set (well documented) policies and procedures around packaging software and release criteria and security support of the stable branch.
If you're building a platform for "production" use, you don't want the rug pulled out from under you by the base distro suddenly upgrading libraries and package versions and changing functionality just because there is a new shiny version of something released upstream.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.