LinuxQuestions.org
Help answer threads with 0 replies.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - General
User Name
Password
Linux - General This Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 04-03-2010, 04:47 PM   #46
smeezekitty
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2009
Location: Washington U.S.
Distribution: M$ Windows / Debian / Ubuntu / DSL / many others
Posts: 2,339

Rep: Reputation: 231Reputation: 231Reputation: 231

^^ Beware, that is not reliable for backups.
BTW this reminded me i have to backup.
 
Old 04-05-2010, 07:31 PM   #47
wolfv
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2010
Posts: 30

Rep: Reputation: 1
Smile I was in the exact same situation

Hi newbiesforever.

I wrote a script using rsync for this situation. I have been using it for months and it works very well. You can download it from rsync2u. Instructions are at the top of the file.

Last edited by wolfv; 04-05-2010 at 10:35 PM.
 
Old 04-08-2010, 07:18 AM   #48
peter1234
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2009
Posts: 42

Rep: Reputation: 2
I use CD/DVD and k3b and md5 to make sure everything is ok after CD/DVD finish.
keep things simple.
 
Old 04-08-2010, 07:43 AM   #49
bakdong
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2009
Posts: 214

Rep: Reputation: 44
Quote:
Originally Posted by syg00 View Post
Tape - no question. I still have backup tapes I created over 30 years ago. They sit in a cardboard box in my office in a sub-tropical environment. And they were still readable a year ago. Real (as in reel) tapes mind..
How much data can tapes hold before they get too cumbersome/time consuming? What if I want to back up 2 or 3 hundred gigabytes of data, say, once a week? What sort of routine would that take and what would the ballpark cost of setting it up be, do you think?

For the record, I do backups (snapshots) locally across machines, and also across the internet to remote stores using rsync via ssh.
 
Old 04-08-2010, 07:55 AM   #50
H_TeXMeX_H
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: $RANDOM
Distribution: slackware64
Posts: 12,928
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301
Personally, I consider any data being stored on a HDD as volatile, the HDD could fail at any time, sometimes without any warning even from SMART. Now, the chances of two HDDs failing at the same time is low, but not if they were bought at the same time, and sometimes miracles happen and many HDDs all fail at once.
 
Old 04-08-2010, 08:27 AM   #51
cantab
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2009
Location: England
Distribution: Kubuntu, Ubuntu, Debian, Proxmox.
Posts: 553

Rep: Reputation: 115Reputation: 115
The largest tape drives currently are a terabyte, from IBM's TS1130. Drives are in the thousands of dollars, tapes are about 30-40 dollars. So you'd have to be doing quite a lot of backing up before the tape offers a price advantage over hard drives, though of course there are other factors to consider.
 
Old 04-08-2010, 08:45 AM   #52
H_TeXMeX_H
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: $RANDOM
Distribution: slackware64
Posts: 12,928
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301
Quote:
Originally Posted by cantab View Post
The largest tape drives currently are a terabyte, from IBM's TS1130. Drives are in the thousands of dollars, tapes are about 30-40 dollars. So you'd have to be doing quite a lot of backing up before the tape offers a price advantage over hard drives, though of course there are other factors to consider.
Yeah, I think tape drives are a lot better than using HDDs, especially for server backups. I don't think HDDs should ever be considered for specifically backing up data, neither flash drives, nor floppy disks (some of my teachers still use these for backups).
 
Old 04-08-2010, 12:02 PM   #53
newbiesforever
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2006
Location: Iowa
Distribution: Debian distro family
Posts: 2,375

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Quote:
Originally Posted by H_TeXMeX_H View Post
Yeah, I think tape drives are a lot better than using HDDs, especially for server backups. I don't think HDDs should ever be considered for specifically backing up data, neither flash drives, nor floppy disks (some of my teachers still use these for backups).
Floppy disks?? They must have very small amounts of data to back up.
 
Old 04-08-2010, 12:41 PM   #54
bakdong
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2009
Posts: 214

Rep: Reputation: 44
A terabyte is useful. How long does it take to write that? (Or what is the transfer rate?) Thousands of dollars is not so much nowadays. But I think we are getting into the semantics between 'backups' and 'archives' now.
 
Old 04-08-2010, 01:04 PM   #55
Larry Webb
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Jul 2006
Location: Crystal Beach, Texas
Distribution: Suse for mail +
Posts: 5,100
Blog Entries: 7

Rep: Reputation: 229Reputation: 229Reputation: 229
Quote:
Originally Posted by H_TeXMeX_H View Post
Yeah, I think tape drives are a lot better than using HDDs, especially for server backups. I don't think HDDs should ever be considered for specifically backing up data, neither flash drives, nor floppy disks (some of my teachers still use these for backups).
There needs to be more to the equation such as cost and location. Most backup is done and stored at the same location as the equipment. What happens in a major disaster as hurricane, explosion, etc? To be good I think the backup should be done in triplicate in different locations on identical machines - that is if cost is no object but then comes the security issue.
 
Old 04-08-2010, 01:50 PM   #56
H_TeXMeX_H
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: $RANDOM
Distribution: slackware64
Posts: 12,928
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301
Major disaster ? Hmm, store the tapes in a tough safe...
 
Old 04-08-2010, 05:29 PM   #57
cantab
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2009
Location: England
Distribution: Kubuntu, Ubuntu, Debian, Proxmox.
Posts: 553

Rep: Reputation: 115Reputation: 115
I work for a business that owns a bank vault. (I may have already mentioned this...) Seriously. We rent a building that used to be a bank, the vault's still there, massive steel door and all. Locks are gone, but I figure it'll be fireproof at least.

That would be a good place to keep backups. But...we're not even taking any :-( I haven't even been able to convince people to use the fileservers instead of storing stuff on desktops or (worse) unencrypted USB sticks. The only person who uses the server seems to be me. Since the beginning of February I've been asked to do data recovery four times *sigh*.
 
Old 04-08-2010, 05:52 PM   #58
dakoder
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Dec 2009
Location: Swindon Wiltshire England Earth
Distribution: Debian, mint-9, tinycore
Posts: 1

Rep: Reputation: 0
I have found the INTERNET the most reliable backup....
I still have files from 13 years ago which were uploaded onto excite,
The hardest thing is remembering which laptop has which data most up to date
but since using LINUX this whole process has become so easy.

Graham
 
Old 04-08-2010, 05:54 PM   #59
dv502
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2006
Location: USA - NYC
Distribution: Whatever icon you see!
Posts: 642

Rep: Reputation: 57
.........

Last edited by dv502; 04-08-2010 at 06:29 PM.
 
Old 06-13-2010, 05:33 PM   #60
newbiesforever
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2006
Location: Iowa
Distribution: Debian distro family
Posts: 2,375

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: Disabled
miscellanous questions

Quote:
Originally Posted by dakoder View Post
I have found the INTERNET the most reliable backup....
I still have files from 13 years ago which were uploaded onto excite,
The hardest thing is remembering which laptop has which data most up to date
but since using LINUX this whole process has become so easy.

Graham
Does that cost money? I assume so. I understand Carbonite costs only $50/year, but that would still cost much more than backing up myself and would take my backed-up data out of my control.

I was just trying to back up to a CD, but I found that the data I want to back up and store away from the computer is too large for one disc--about 1.1 GB. (It wasn't always so large, but I have more pictures these days.) Obviously, I could just use two CDs, but I would like to fit it all onto one piece of media. Should I use a DVD, then? I don't have a DVD drive or any blank DVDs, but I think a family member's computer has a DVD drive that I can borrow. If I hadn't been told here that flash drives can fail at any time without warning, I'd prefer them, because they look less shiny and attention-catching (to a thief) than an optical disk.

Last edited by newbiesforever; 06-13-2010 at 05:36 PM.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
"Adding a Medium" in Medium Manager???? kymystic Mandriva 1 03-07-2005 03:16 AM
Why does everyone prefer Slackware? necbrownie Slackware 22 08-27-2004 04:35 PM
IT'S OK! to Prefer your Distro zegos General 12 04-08-2004 10:50 AM
Which OS do you prefer? digiplaya General 24 12-14-2003 06:24 PM
Why we prefer Linux! aiims1777 Linux - General 4 12-10-2003 08:11 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - General

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:02 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration