Linux - General This Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place. |
| Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
 |
GNU/Linux Basic Guide
This 255-page guide will provide you with the keys to understand the philosophy of free software, teach you how to use and handle it, and give you the tools required to move easily in the world of GNU/Linux. Many users and administrators will be taking their first steps with this GNU/Linux Basic guide and it will show you how to approach and solve the problems you encounter.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free. |
|
 |
01-12-2004, 02:39 PM
|
#1
|
|
Member
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia
Distribution: SUSE, Feather, Red Hat 9
Posts: 53
Rep:
|
what is the difference between unix and linux
ok, so what is the big difference between unix and linux? other than the linux is free part.
i'm about to take a course in unix in college, and i'd like to know what i'm getting into. is the folder setup the same way? is the kernel the same? what are the biggest differences that come to mind??
thanks in advance!
|
|
|
|
01-12-2004, 02:42 PM
|
#2
|
|
Member
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: Somewhere in Surrey
Distribution: Debian GNU/Linux 6.0.5 (amd64) w/kernel 3.0.4
Posts: 278
Rep:
|
UNIX is the general name for a loosely related confederation of operating systems written between the 1970s and the early 1990s. One example of a UNIX operating system is Minix, from whence Linus derived Linux. Linux is like UNIX only because it defines the same API that UNIX does, which facilitated the porting of dozens of software libraries and applications.
If you know your way around Linux, the same can be said of most UNIX variants, and vice versa.
|
|
|
|
01-12-2004, 03:25 PM
|
#3
|
|
Member
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia
Distribution: SUSE, Feather, Red Hat 9
Posts: 53
Original Poster
Rep:
|
thanks. i know enough about linux to get me around, and hopefully after this class i'll be able to do alot more than everyday stuff.
any other offers of differences are still welcomed
|
|
|
|
01-12-2004, 03:50 PM
|
#4
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Sep 2002
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 1,552
Rep:
|
Unix is still alive today. Just look for Solaris, AIX, HP-UX, Tru64...
|
|
|
|
01-12-2004, 04:26 PM
|
#5
|
|
Member
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: Trento, Italy
Distribution: Debian testing
Posts: 394
Rep:
|
Actually "Linux" is only one particular (even if widely used) kernel family.
A complete system, which is what you mean by UNIX, should be referred to as GNU/Linux. There are even free (speech) unix-like os not based on linux, like FreeBSD and OpenBSD. ( http://www.freebsd.org/)
|
|
|
|
01-12-2004, 06:09 PM
|
#6
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Feb 2003
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 4,113
Rep: 
|
Don't forget GNU/DOS and GNU/Windows. Actually, the BSDs often have GNU utilities on them so they're GNU/FreeBSD and GNU/OpenBSD and GNU/NetBSD as well. Incidentally, why is it GNU/Hurd if the Hurd is GNU, too? Isn't that redundant? I guess so it won't be confused with GNU/Foo.
There are free non-Unix OSes, too. FreeDOS, ReactOS, and a zillion others. Er, GNU/FreeDOS and GNU/ReactOS and a GNU/zillion GNU/others.
Y'know, all through the 80s there were GNU utilities but the things didn't *run* except as UNIX. But I don't recall any GNU/UNIX movement because, after all, GNU's Not Unix. But if GNU's Not Linux, either, then it should be called Linux, as that's the only way it *runs*, *until* the Hurd and then it should be called GNU/Hurd because it *is* Hurd. Or Hurd is GNU. Or so I've hurd.
Anyway - with dosemu I suppose I run a GNU/Linux/FreeDOS/RIT/Symantec system. Or, well, since GNU comes before Linux, to carry out the logic, I run a Symantec/RIT/FreeDOS/GNU/Linux system.
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:31 PM.
|
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|