Linux - GeneralThis Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Hi There,
I want some clarification on GPL Agreement on the usages of free software.
I want to clarify the following:
"If a license infringements found on a open-source/freeware product, then the developer/provider will not be sued rather the user who use the same can be sued"
Is it some thing like that? Please clear my doubts.
If the terms of any license are violated, then the liability is with the person who did the violation. You have to read the particular license to see what you are and are not allowed to do.
I believe (from a common sense point of view, licenses generally go the other way) that if the software ITSELF infronges copyright, obviously it's the developers fault.
If a user uses software to violate copyright etc. then it is the users fault (probably in the ToS for the software anyway).
SCO been hassling you? or you trying to rip off something and sell it? :P
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.