Linux - GeneralThis Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
If anyone else out there also had fun getting started on his creations, poke your head up here.
Sad to hear Sinclair is gone. The Sinclair ZX81 was a great home machine. I programmed on the competition, a Commodore CBM 8032 with the external 8050 dual drive floppy disk. Developed a travel agency multi-part ticketing system and accounts receivable package. Ah, those were the days!
I still remember the day I brought a ZX81 back from work to show my mother what a computer actually looks like. We plugged it into our TV set and I showed her a little basic program that I had written to convert fahrenheit temperatures to centigrade and vice versa. She sniffed and said, "I can't see what's so revolutionary about that! It only does what you tell it to."
I said, "If you understand that, you already know more about computers than two thirds of the people in this country."
Didn't Sinclair also create that weird little three-wheeled car that you didn't need a driving license for because it was officially a motorbike? That sank without trace. But when I read the famous article "Linux is not Windows" which compares operating systems to bikes and cars, and warns about trying to create a hybrid, I was reminded at once of Clive Sinclair.
I had the Spectrum too, and learned Assembler on it. Computing was low on my list of priorities at the time. Later I moved to the Amstrad 6128 which ran games for the kids, but also had CP/M. I bought an Office software package for IR£7 or so with an editor, database, spreadsheet, & comms packages all complete on one 180k floppy.
Clive sank big bucks into some futuristic project that never happened. His idea was that you have the CPU in the centre communicating with all the slower peripherals and scrap the approach of everything waiting their turn on the same data bus. We have a version of it today - multiple cores in an APU, with
The GPU on it's own databus
The ram on it's own (double width) databus.
The Southbridge-type ASIC on a databus controlling the peripherals.
But although the idea was the future, in the 1990s it was too far, too fast. Back in the 1990s, chip fabrication couldn't deliver the speed, a vast amount of optimisation and circuit development needed to happen, and nobody's pockets were deep enough.
The Sinclair Scientific was the first scientific calculator that fit in your pocket and cost less than $100. I remember watching it compute a sin in 30 seconds. Pitiful as it was, it was an eye-opener on what you could accomplish if you set high goals.
I too started on a Spectrum and then switched to the QL. It's worth noting that Linus bought a QL in preference to a PC and said that he learnt a lot from disassembling the QDOS operating system. I still use some old QL software via an emulator running with Wine. The funny thing about QDOS was that it was a last-minute thing. The version of CP/M that Sinclair had commissioned was too slow and loo large, so he asked if any of his staff knew how to write an operating system — Tony Tebby volunteered, although he was an engineer hired to work on a portable TV!
Distribution: Void, Linux From Scratch, Slackware64
Posts: 3,155
Rep:
Had most of his computers at one time, learnt a lot, had a programmable calculator, tv and black watch as well, guess i was a bit of a fanboy, RIP uncle clive
Didn't Sinclair also create that weird little three-wheeled car that you didn't need a driving license for because it was officially a motorbike?
Indeed, except it was actually a tiny electric car/bike. In 1985.
Quote:
Originally Posted by hazel
That sank without trace. But when I read the famous article "Linux is not Windows" which compares operating systems to bikes and cars, and warns about trying to create a hybrid, I was reminded at once of Clive Sinclair.
The man was ridiculously far ahead of his time, but his story is the classic tale of an inventor/scientist lacking the necessary business skills to bring his vision to fruition as a commercial product.
Compare that to Alan Sugar, who basically stormed in from the sidelines and re-implemented the most successful of Sinclair's products, with a few modifications that addressed their most obvious shortcomings. He was no inventor, but he was a shrewd businessman who knew to learn from others' mistakes. Amstrad (Alan Michael Sugar TRADing) even ended up buying up all of Sinclair Research's computer-related IP.
There was quite a vogue for those little things in the 50s and 60s. There are collectors — a 1963 Isetta is available on ebay for £15K — and there's a Bubblecar Museum in Boston (Links.)
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.