LinuxQuestions.org
Welcome to the most active Linux Forum on the web.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - General
User Name
Password
Linux - General This Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 09-12-2004, 11:30 PM   #1
bobwall
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2004
Location: Milpitas, California
Distribution: 1/2 Debian 1/2 my own
Posts: 189

Rep: Reputation: 30
reiser4 performance/fragmentation


Hello everyone. I've converted my notebook's file system to reiser4 and have been using it for a few months to test it before converting two other desktops to reiser4. So far, I havn't lost any data so I guess it's reliable enough. I'm confident that reiser fs will emerge to be a defacto file system due to its extentibility (even xfs isn't as scalable as it says it is since it doesn't support plugins). My only beef with it are the following:

The laptop is a vaio pcgfxa32 circa 2001 (900mhz, 256mb, 15gb)

1. I hardly notice any increased performance. I guess this is because laptop hard disks are much more slower than desktop ones, so this could be a bottle neck. Disk noise has virtually ceased though.


2. The file fragmentation is worse than ext3's. When I download a 50mb video clip from a file sharing program, filefrag reports an average of 500 to 1500 fragments (disk used/total: 3500mb/4000mb). Even with static copy operations, the fragmentation is much worse than ext3's.

3. I can't play Half-life or use rpm with certain operations (when /var/lib/rpm is on a reiser4 file system) when they're located on a reiser4 file system. Someone told me that this is because of a bug in reiser4 where you are able to cd into any file that have the execute bit set.

Any comments or insights?
Thanks for any help,
Yale
 
Old 09-13-2004, 05:28 AM   #2
crashmeister
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2002
Distribution: t2 - trying to anyway
Posts: 2,541

Rep: Reputation: 47
I just put the / partition of my laptop on reiser4 and that went ugly so I can't say anything from personal experience.
What I gathered so far is that people that tarred the partitions they want to migrate and then untarred them to reiser4 seem to have performance problems after a while.Read/writes are getting slower after some time (they claim).
That doesn't seem to be an issue if the whole data gets just moved.
Downloads from file sharing programs are not a good indicator for fragmentation since the file gets split up in a bunch of pieces alrady to start with.Had a ext3 partition once that would only write to a burner with 8-10x max since it was seeking the next piece most of the time.

Got no idea about the rpm thing.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
will reiser4 fs convert? kahn Linux From Scratch 3 09-06-2007 08:21 AM
Reiser4 - Anyone Tried It? AxXium Slackware 2 06-23-2005 10:45 AM
reiser4 equinox SUSE / openSUSE 1 04-25-2005 09:00 AM
reiser4 stable yet? asuka Linux - General 3 10-24-2004 06:06 AM
Harddisk fragmentation tiredoflogins Linux - Hardware 3 10-20-2004 03:17 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - General

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:28 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration