reiser4 performance/fragmentation
Hello everyone. I've converted my notebook's file system to reiser4 and have been using it for a few months to test it before converting two other desktops to reiser4. So far, I havn't lost any data so I guess it's reliable enough. I'm confident that reiser fs will emerge to be a defacto file system due to its extentibility (even xfs isn't as scalable as it says it is since it doesn't support plugins). My only beef with it are the following:
The laptop is a vaio pcgfxa32 circa 2001 (900mhz, 256mb, 15gb)
1. I hardly notice any increased performance. I guess this is because laptop hard disks are much more slower than desktop ones, so this could be a bottle neck. Disk noise has virtually ceased though.
2. The file fragmentation is worse than ext3's. When I download a 50mb video clip from a file sharing program, filefrag reports an average of 500 to 1500 fragments (disk used/total: 3500mb/4000mb). Even with static copy operations, the fragmentation is much worse than ext3's.
3. I can't play Half-life or use rpm with certain operations (when /var/lib/rpm is on a reiser4 file system) when they're located on a reiser4 file system. Someone told me that this is because of a bug in reiser4 where you are able to cd into any file that have the execute bit set.
Any comments or insights?
Thanks for any help,
Yale
|