Linux - General This Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place. |
| Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
 |
GNU/Linux Basic Guide
This 255-page guide will provide you with the keys to understand the philosophy of free software, teach you how to use and handle it, and give you the tools required to move easily in the world of GNU/Linux. Many users and administrators will be taking their first steps with this GNU/Linux Basic guide and it will show you how to approach and solve the problems you encounter.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free. |
|
 |
|
02-20-2008, 11:40 PM
|
#1
|
|
Member
Registered: Jun 2004
Location: Phoenix, Arizona, USA
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 50
Rep:
|
Need your recommendation for a fast & easy distribution.
I currently run Ubuntu with Gnome on my one year old computer. For my needs, this distribution is too bloated. I only need smooth scrolling web pages on Firefox, a media player, and good looking fonts. Could you suggest any easy to use distribution that will make my computer run fast? Please note that I am absolutely terrified of the command line.
|
|
|
|
02-20-2008, 11:48 PM
|
#2
|
|
Member
Registered: Jan 2006
Distribution: OpenSUSE 11.2, OpenSUSE 11.3,Arch
Posts: 240
Rep:
|
Ubuntu is always recommended for a beginner, however if u dont like it......there are other distros you can choose from, a few of them are mandriva and openSUSE both have their own configuration managers (mandriva control centre and YAST respectively) and also excellent media support. You may never have to use the command line for your needs.....
|
|
|
|
02-21-2008, 12:26 AM
|
#3
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Feb 2003
Location: Calif, USA
Distribution: Linux Mint 12
Posts: 2,838
Rep:
|
You might as well go for Slackware.
It will do what you want and bring you face to face with your fears. 
|
|
|
|
02-21-2008, 01:34 AM
|
#4
|
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Feb 2008
Distribution: LFS
Posts: 23
Rep:
|
Ubuntu has become possibly the best distro for new users...
OpenSUSE and Mandriva are too complicated and with too complex configuration tools.
|
|
|
|
02-21-2008, 01:55 AM
|
#5
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Feb 2003
Location: Calif, USA
Distribution: Linux Mint 12
Posts: 2,838
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheBeli
Ubuntu has become possibly the best distro for new users...
OpenSUSE and Mandriva are too complicated and with too complex configuration tools.
|
I agree that Ubuntu is "easier" for many reasons. I do not agree that OpenSUSE or Mandriva are "too complex". Both are more "traditional" Linux installations and include a large number of software choices and normal *nix root account. I do not really consider this "bad".
|
|
|
|
02-21-2008, 01:57 AM
|
#6
|
|
Member
Registered: Jul 2007
Location: /dev/urandom
Posts: 70
Rep:
|
Another vote for Slackware!!!
|
|
|
|
02-21-2008, 07:20 AM
|
#7
|
|
Member
Registered: Jun 2004
Location: Phoenix, Arizona, USA
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 50
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Slackware is too difficult for my simple little brain.
I just visited the Slackware site and read some of the documentation. Slackware looks way to difficult for my simple little brain. Keep in mind that I gave up Windows in part because it is too complex. You need to update, update, update, install security applications, and configure every application carefully to assure that they do not take over your computer.
|
|
|
|
02-21-2008, 11:41 AM
|
#8
|
|
Member
Registered: Jul 2007
Location: /dev/urandom
Posts: 70
Rep:
|
Your still going to have to update, in fact I find I update more frequent when i do with windows, but there is no "auto-update" you actually have to run the update, it wont run in the background.
|
|
|
|
02-21-2008, 12:12 PM
|
#9
|
|
Member
Registered: Jun 2004
Location: Phoenix, Arizona, USA
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 50
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Should I try a Slackware derivative?
Because Slackware is so difficult, should I try a Slackware derivative or should I try something with an emphasis on xforce.
|
|
|
|
02-22-2008, 05:39 AM
|
#10
|
|
LQ 5k Club
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Oldham, Lancs, England
Distribution: Laptop: Slackware 14.0 // Desktop: Slackware64 14.0 // Netbook: Slackware 14.0
Posts: 6,176
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dreamcast
Because Slackware is so difficult, should I try a Slackware derivative
|
Slackware isn't difficult. True, it needs a bit more effort during installation. and a bit more post-install configuration, than Ubuntu. But nothing too challenging - if I can do it, anyone can. You could try Zenwalk, it's a one-application-per-job slimmed-down Slackware.
|
|
|
|
02-22-2008, 06:49 AM
|
#11
|
|
LQ Veteran
Registered: Nov 2005
Location: Annapolis, MD
Distribution: Arch/XFCE
Posts: 17,797
|
Quote:
|
Please note that I am absolutely terrified of the command line.
|
If I had not seen this, I would suggest something like Arch. Also, my impression is that Slackware is more dependent on the command-line than some others.
My personal mind-set is that it is better to get comfortable with the command line. There are many situations where it the fastest and easiest way to do something.
Arch is fast in operation--especially with something like XFCE. It is also very fast to install.
I second brianL's suggestion of Zenwalk--it defaults to XFCE and is fast. (I don't like its package manager (netpkg))
|
|
|
|
02-22-2008, 03:03 PM
|
#12
|
|
LQ 5k Club
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Oldham, Lancs, England
Distribution: Laptop: Slackware 14.0 // Desktop: Slackware64 14.0 // Netbook: Slackware 14.0
Posts: 6,176
|
There's no need to be terrified of the command line, it doesn't bite. If you can type a post to LQ, you can type commands in the terminal.
|
|
|
|
02-22-2008, 03:10 PM
|
#13
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,257
Rep:
|
Stay away from Slackware.
OpenSuse will probably run even slower than Ubuntu.
Mandriva might be okay.
Also take a look at SimplyMepis and PCLinuxOS, stupid-simple distros with all the proprietary multi-media stuff pre-installed. I am told Linux Mint is great also, but I have not tried it yet.
|
|
|
|
02-22-2008, 03:16 PM
|
#14
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Nov 2004
Location: Saint Amant, Acadiana
Distribution: Gentoo ~
Posts: 2,756
Rep: 
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dreamcast
I currently run Ubuntu with Gnome on my one year old computer. For my needs, this distribution is too bloated. I only need smooth scrolling web pages on Firefox, a media player, and good looking fonts. Could you suggest any easy to use distribution that will make my computer run fast? Please note that I am absolutely terrified of the command line.
|
Smooth scrolling in Firefox ... this is something you need to tell webmasters. Nothing but hardware upgrade will give you smooth web browsing. I have a rather old IBM T23 running at 1130 MHz, some sites just kill it, e.g. www.formula1.com.
|
|
|
|
02-24-2008, 01:07 AM
|
#15
|
|
Member
Registered: Dec 2007
Location: Australia
Distribution: Puppy, debian
Posts: 118
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dreamcast
I only need smooth scrolling web pages on Firefox, a media player, and good looking fonts. Could you suggest any easy to use distribution that will make my computer run fast?
|
I suggest Puppy Linux 215CE (community edition) - although it comes with Seamonkey, Firefox is easily installed if you don't like Seamonkey. The "normal" Puppy 3.01 is fast but the 215 Community Edition has some nicer fonts and wallpaper. Puppy runs from a cd, so you can try it out and see if you like it. I find it very easy to use.
http://puppylinux.org/wikka/DownloadLatest
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:30 AM.
|
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|