LinuxQuestions.org
Did you know LQ has a Linux Hardware Compatibility List?
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - General
User Name
Password
Linux - General This Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.

Notices

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 06-27-2012, 02:23 AM   #1
0men
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2011
Location: Gold Coast, Australia
Distribution: saline, centos, freeBSD, slackware
Posts: 180

Rep: Reputation: 22
Little Known Linux Distributions


There must be thousands of Linux Distributions out there these days. I've tried ALOT, and every so often ill stumble onto one that i've heard no one talk about and which i really enjoy. Peppermint and Saline for example.

Was wondering if anyone else has found any Linux distro's in which they've really enjoyed and no one really knows about.
 
Old 06-27-2012, 09:06 AM   #2
tronayne
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: Northeastern Michigan, where Carhartt is a Designer Label
Distribution: Slackware 32- & 64-bit Stable
Posts: 3,108

Rep: Reputation: 807Reputation: 807Reputation: 807Reputation: 807Reputation: 807Reputation: 807Reputation: 807
Yeah, there are a lot of 'em -- and, you what? many are based on Slackware.

So, why not give Slackware a try -- unadulterated, as close as possible to what developers intended, rock solid, dependable and a pleasure to work with.

Hope this helps some.
 
Old 06-27-2012, 11:51 AM   #3
DavidMcCann
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jul 2006
Location: London
Distribution: CentOS, Salix
Posts: 3,191

Rep: Reputation: 815Reputation: 815Reputation: 815Reputation: 815Reputation: 815Reputation: 815Reputation: 815
Quote:
Originally Posted by tronayne View Post
Yeah, there are a lot of 'em -- and, you what? many are based on Slackware.
Even for a Slackware fanboy, this takes the biscuit. There are 320 distros listed at Distrowatch. 18 are based on Slackware, as opposed to 144 on Debian. Eliminating the specialist ones, the foreign language ones, and the just plain bad ones, we have two that I know to be good (Salix and Vector) and two that other reviewers have liked (Draco and Linvo).

If you want something that's not in the Distrowatch top 50 but still good (see my reviews on this site), look at
Parsix (102 on the Distro watch hit list): Debian based, Gnome desktop
Kororaa (99): Fedora based, Gnome or KDE desktop
SalineOS (84): Debian based, Xfce desktop
ZevenOS (62): Ubuntu based, Xfce desktop tweaked to look like BeOS

You see I agree with you on SalineOS; I shall have to look at Pepermint!
 
3 members found this post helpful.
Old 06-27-2012, 11:56 AM   #4
frieza
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2002
Location: harvard, il
Distribution: Ubuntu 11.4,DD-WRT micro plus ssh,lfs-6.6,Fedora 15,Fedora 16
Posts: 3,111

Rep: Reputation: 371Reputation: 371Reputation: 371Reputation: 371
as far as i understand there are only a handful of main 'upstream' distributions, such as redhat, debian and slackware, and a most other distributions (fedora,ubuntu,mint,scientific linux,centos,suse,peppermint and saline) are derivative distributions. then there are custom, purpose built distributions that only serve one function. are there lesser known distributions? quite a few actually, are there lesser known distributions that i've stumbled upon and used? yes and no... none of them were general use distributions, but i have used coyote linux (floppy based router distribution), dd-wrt (embeded router distribution meant as a firmware replacement for wireless routers), and floppix (floppy based mini distribution) similar to knoppix.
 
Old 06-27-2012, 12:12 PM   #5
brianL
LQ 5k Club
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Oldham, Lancs, England
Distribution: Slackware & Slackware64 14.1
Posts: 7,081
Blog Entries: 52

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Here's something different: Gobolinux.
I tried it briefly back in my wild distrohopping days.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 06-27-2012, 01:02 PM   #6
sycamorex
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Nov 2005
Location: London
Distribution: Slackware64-current
Posts: 5,581
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 1033Reputation: 1033Reputation: 1033Reputation: 1033Reputation: 1033Reputation: 1033Reputation: 1033Reputation: 1033
Apart from very specialised, purpose built distributions, I don't see a reason why I would want to run anything apart from the "upstream" or top "semi-upstream" distros. Having said that, there's one that always intrigues me. I just don't have skills or time to gain the skills to configure it (link)
 
Old 06-27-2012, 01:06 PM   #7
273
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2011
Location: UK
Distribution: Debian Sid AMD64, Raspbian Wheezy, various VMs
Posts: 3,508

Rep: Reputation: 800Reputation: 800Reputation: 800Reputation: 800Reputation: 800Reputation: 800Reputation: 800
Quote:
Originally Posted by brianL View Post
Here's something different: Gobolinux.
I tried it briefly back in my wild distrohopping days.
Wow, well, er, yes, why!?!
Still, have to give it a look now...
Thanks.
 
Old 06-27-2012, 03:24 PM   #8
brianL
LQ 5k Club
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Oldham, Lancs, England
Distribution: Slackware & Slackware64 14.1
Posts: 7,081
Blog Entries: 52

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Quote:
Originally Posted by 273 View Post
Wow, well, er, yes, why!?!
Wow, well, er...why not?!? It was there, so I hopped onto it. Hopped back to Slack pretty quickly, though.
 
Old 06-27-2012, 04:09 PM   #9
273
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2011
Location: UK
Distribution: Debian Sid AMD64, Raspbian Wheezy, various VMs
Posts: 3,508

Rep: Reputation: 800Reputation: 800Reputation: 800Reputation: 800Reputation: 800Reputation: 800Reputation: 800
Quote:
Originally Posted by brianL View Post
Wow, well, er...why not?!? It was there, so I hopped onto it. Hopped back to Slack pretty quickly, though.
Sorry, that was mainly aimed at the distro, not your trying it.
I'm sure the creators have their reasons -- to me it looks more like a proof of concept than anything else.
 
Old 06-27-2012, 04:14 PM   #10
brianL
LQ 5k Club
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Oldham, Lancs, England
Distribution: Slackware & Slackware64 14.1
Posts: 7,081
Blog Entries: 52

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Quote:
Originally Posted by 273 View Post
I'm sure the creators have their reasons -- to me it looks more like a proof of concept than anything else.
Yeah, doesn't seem to have caught on. Novelty value, maybe.
 
Old 06-27-2012, 04:20 PM   #11
fogpipe
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2011
Distribution: Slackware 64 Current
Posts: 338

Rep: Reputation: 83
Quote:
Originally Posted by DavidMcCann View Post
Even for a Slackware fanboy, this takes the biscuit. There are 320 distros listed at
I agree many of them are based on slackware and in more that a decade of linux use vector is one of the best i have encountered.
 
Old 06-27-2012, 04:29 PM   #12
frieza
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2002
Location: harvard, il
Distribution: Ubuntu 11.4,DD-WRT micro plus ssh,lfs-6.6,Fedora 15,Fedora 16
Posts: 3,111

Rep: Reputation: 371Reputation: 371Reputation: 371Reputation: 371
Quote:
Originally Posted by sycamorex View Post
Apart from very specialised, purpose built distributions, I don't see a reason why I would want to run anything apart from the "upstream" or top "semi-upstream" distros. Having said that, there's one that always intrigues me. I just don't have skills or time to gain the skills to configure it (link)
lol, Hannah Montana linux, i wonder if she even uses it (doubtful, highly doubtful)

either way i would have to agree that although intriguing it may be to play with a lesser known distribution, and there maybe even a valid reason for such, using farther "downstream" distributions with smaller user bases carries a more significant risk of the project losing support from under you when using it, leaving you with older, more vulnerable software. no harm in playing with them though
 
Old 06-27-2012, 04:36 PM   #13
273
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2011
Location: UK
Distribution: Debian Sid AMD64, Raspbian Wheezy, various VMs
Posts: 3,508

Rep: Reputation: 800Reputation: 800Reputation: 800Reputation: 800Reputation: 800Reputation: 800Reputation: 800
Quote:
Originally Posted by sycamorex View Post
Apart from very specialised, purpose built distributions, I don't see a reason why I would want to run anything apart from the "upstream" or top "semi-upstream" distros. Having said that, there's one that always intrigues me. I just don't have skills or time to gain the skills to configure it (link)
I missed this.
I, myself, downloaded this which is similar in its dedication but does, actually, have something new to offer. Sadly what it has to offer doesn't work on my hardware. Well, either that or I tried it on the wrong day of the week...

Last edited by 273; 06-27-2012 at 04:37 PM.
 
Old 06-27-2012, 04:41 PM   #14
brianL
LQ 5k Club
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Oldham, Lancs, England
Distribution: Slackware & Slackware64 14.1
Posts: 7,081
Blog Entries: 52

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
You could seriously mess up your computer dual-booting those two.
 
Old 06-28-2012, 06:49 AM   #15
salasi
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jul 2007
Location: Directly above centre of the earth, UK
Distribution: SuSE, plus some hopping
Posts: 3,916

Rep: Reputation: 777Reputation: 777Reputation: 777Reputation: 777Reputation: 777Reputation: 777Reputation: 777
Quote:
Originally Posted by frieza View Post
...and a most other distributions (fedora,ubuntu,mint,scientific linux,centos,suse,peppermint and saline) are derivative distributions...
Sort of: fedora is kind of a reverse derivative, in the sense that it is where stuff get tried out before it then goes into RedHat, so in the sense of testing and flow, RH is a derivative of Fedora. Suse (either open or SLED/SLES) isn't really a derivative of anything; yeah, sure, it started life as a slackware derivative, but it hasn't been that in any real way for years and years.

Centos and Scientific are a slightly different case; one reason for their existence is to be an exact RH 'work-alike', unlike most of these distros which have more of a 'if only Ubuntu had a different GUI' kind of focus.

Not that there is anything wrong with any of this; just pointing out that there are several different categories here. And there is more information than you ever thought you wanted (well, as a picture, anyway), here.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:14 AM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration