[SOLVED] Linux Language Culture - Is proprietary a dirty word?
Linux - GeneralThis Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Location: Tembagapura, Papua, Indonesia and Perth Australia
Distribution: Linux Mint, Rasbian and Ubuntu Mate
Posts: 11
Rep:
Linux Language Culture - Is proprietary a dirty word?
I have a question about language in Linux forums and Linux related conversations generally:
Is the word proprietary a "Dirty word" in Linux circles?
In some places the term 3rd Party software is used in the context of Nvidia Drivers or CODECS for example. But it feels like "proprietary" software holds a negative connotation similar to the way that MYSQL and MARIADB are compared since Oracle now owns MYSQL.
Is my feeling of a negative connotation for the word proprietary true?
I wouldn't say "proprietary" is exactly a dirty word, exactly, but the concept is contrary to the values of free and open source software. Most Linux users who pay attention to such stuff use proprietary software (NVidia drivers are an excellent example) only if there is no other satisfactory solution for doing what they need to do.
Oracle and MySQL present a special example. The issue with Oracle is not so much proprietary vs. open source, but Oracle's history vs. open source software (and anything else it sees as competition). It was the creator of MySQL himself who forked MySQL to MariaDB when Oracle acquired MySQLfrom Sun.
Oracle also acquired VirtualBox along the way. They seem to have stewarded VirtualBox well. They passed off OpenOffice to Apache; the cynical say that they did so because they could not figure out a way to monetize it.
We wish. It is commonly used as a pejorative - similar to "binary blob" for some. The more closely aligned to Stallman's strict criteria the more likely to be used this way I would posit.
We wish. It is commonly used as a pejorative - similar to "binary blob" for some. The more closely aligned to Stallman's strict criteria the more likely to be used this way I would posit.
I'd argue with "commonly" 'tho I have observed the pejorative use on occasion. Usually having little to do with Stallman but rather with frustration that the app/OS doesn't work as one would like it to and/or the latest update "broke" something.
I've seen this with Windows (doh) and iOS ('nother doh), but seldom in the *nix world...in my experience...but then I don't hang out with many "purists" (except here )
I'd argue with "commonly" 'tho I have observed the pejorative use on occasion. Usually having little to do with Stallman but rather with frustration that the app/OS doesn't work as one would like it to and/or the latest update "broke" something.
Yeah, and after three or four decades of that one does tend to associate BLOBs and proprietary software in general with trash. It may appear shiny and grand from time to time but the shine quickly wears off and then reality kicks in, sometimes quite hard.
So while I would say the degree to which it is considered a pejorative varies, the negative connotation is really there. Proprietary is a ever so slightly dirty word or it is very much one, but the extent depends on who you are asking and their experience.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.