LinuxQuestions.org
Share your knowledge at the LQ Wiki.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - General
User Name
Password
Linux - General This Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 04-23-2003, 05:48 PM   #1
dabrown
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Apr 2003
Posts: 4

Rep: Reputation: 0
lilo- mem=exactmap not valid in RH8/RH9?


Greetings.

I have one of those old Compaq Proliant 2500 Dual-PPro servers that I'm trying to squeeze a bit more life out of. It has an oddball 448MB RAM (256+128+64) which worked fine under NT4. Since my company no longer supports NT4, and 2K is way too slow on this old machine, I'm trying to get RH9 to work.

Using the mem statements during install got me past the "Not enough RAM to install" and it got up and running, slowly. It still only recognizes 12MB using the "free" command and dmesg recognizes 16MB via the memory map.

I added this line to the lilo.conf file to no avail:

append " mem=exactmap mem=640k@0 mem=447m@1m"

Still only recognized 12-16MB.

So, I tried booting it via command line:

boot: linux mem=exactmap mem=640k@0 mem=447m@1m

That gives me a message "Invalid Number". It will not accept mem=exactmap at all; it expects a number. But simply using mem=640k@0 mem=447m@1m hangs the system before it loads the kernel. Typing mem=448m doesn't work either; it only sees 16M.

Searches of this board and elsewhere always point to the same solution- use the exactmap statememt to define where the memory is, but that simply isn't working because it won't recognize the "exactmap" statement. And without being able to tell it to "Jump" the chipset-enforced memory "hole" (which is the whole problem) leaves me stuck.

Any pointers, or am I just out of luck?

email: datsunaholic@[nospam]hotmail.com, or reply here. Thank you!
 
Old 04-23-2003, 06:44 PM   #2
jailbait
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Feb 2003
Location: Virginia, USA
Distribution: Debian 12
Posts: 8,340

Rep: Reputation: 550Reputation: 550Reputation: 550Reputation: 550Reputation: 550Reputation: 550
lilo?

When I read your question I did not see any mention of the lilo command. After you updated /etc/lilo.conf did you run lilo?
 
Old 04-24-2003, 11:59 AM   #3
dabrown
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Apr 2003
Posts: 4

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
Oops.

Yeah, that would be what I missed. It seems to work now.

Now, if I only knew how to do this with GRUB. But no matter- it doesn't matter WHICH boot loader it runs with, just that it DOES.

Thank you.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
lilo+ not valid boot signature bingbang Linux - Newbie 9 02-13-2011 07:55 AM
lilo problem - no valid boot signature djbanaan Slackware 9 08-18-2004 07:57 AM
Problem with Lilo, /dev/hda1 have no valid bootsector Sonic_Traveler Slackware 8 08-12-2004 09:30 PM
Should I move away from RH8? If so to RH9? kierl Linux - General 21 06-11-2003 02:15 PM
Editing Lilo in RH8 pow2k2 Linux - Newbie 5 12-28-2002 10:43 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - General

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:29 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration