Is the Beowulf cluster used for only Parallel programs?
Linux - GeneralThis Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Is the Beowulf cluster used for only Parallel programs?
Is the Beowulf cluster used for only Parallel programs? Can sequential(one
thread) programs,such as open office or vim, run on it?
There are about 10000 dumb terminals and old PCs in my company, my leader told me to reuse these devices in order that staffers can use open
offices and xmms and vim etc.,is it possible?if yes,then how can i do?if not,why?
thanks a lot!
Instead of a cluster, I would suggest you are looking for the Linux Terminal Server Project. << www.ltsp.org >>
You run one computer with a full install, and a number of computers that boot from it. The terminals don't even need a hard-drive, everything is stored on the server. You only need to keep the server up-to-date, because the terminals load their system from it.
But one computer as a server is not, i suppose, powerful enough to serve so many dumb terminals, are there some types of cluster to adapt to this environment?
any thoughts welcome -)
We build HPC clusters all day every day, and you can use them for much more than just running parallel jobs!!.
We have tried this - using a cluster to run a load of old diskless workstations running off a HPC cluster back end, and it works!!.....
However, its not just a case of running beowulf, and connecting systems together. If you are serious, then this is what you need to do....
Create your Linux Cluster
Connect diskless client PCs via Ethernet
Modify Linux distibution to act as X-Windows Server, with one node set up as front end server
Create boot sequence that will boot headless nodes so they can run an X-Window session from the server. We were able to run most open source apps such as OpenOffice on multiple client systems.
If you want more information on how we did this, I can provide details,
One computer doesn't need to serve ALL the terminals. You can set-up small groups... Maybe one server in each office with a handful of terminals on it. Basic'ly, each server would have two network cards: one leading to the main network and all the other servers, and one leading to a hub and the terminals it serves. How many terminals do you need to supply? I'd much rather control a hundred servers with ten terminals each than the equivalent thousand individual computers.
Start with a single test group. If it works, you can add more groups to the network, as you have time. Eventually, it could be worked similar to a cluster... Each server would run in a semi-node mode. That way, you could have a main computer somewhere that controlled the network, passing updates and commands to the servers along the network.
I've setup a group of 15 thin clients that run off a single server and interface perfectly with the existing network.
At the moment it uses k12LTSP, but I am considering the move to Slackware 10.0 and LTSP.
I also have a test system of 1 server and 5 thin clients running with Slackware 10.0 and LTSP which I am using to test clustering options.
Please keep me informed of your progress and don't hesitate to ask if you need any further help.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.