LinuxQuestions.org
Share your knowledge at the LQ Wiki.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - General
User Name
Password
Linux - General This Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 12-09-2004, 07:05 AM   #1
Hano
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2001
Location: Venezuela, Caracas
Distribution: RedHat 9.0
Posts: 196

Rep: Reputation: 30
I've finally found my grail of C++ dev setup on linux. (why it took me so long??)


Hi,

After years of dissatisfaction with the present C++ ides on linux, trying to build humonguous dependencies for an app (KDevelop requires Qt and Kdelib, which i had to install only to satisfy it), trying buggy, unsupported tools (semantic-cedet for emacs, is IMHO, unsupported) and trying to have wine to run fugly win32 applications ( i once managed to get VC++ 6 to run under some awfully modified wine version which remembering it makes me cry ) and others that simply doesnt work at a minimal standard or are too heavy on the system (Eclipse-cdt, anjuta), i've find something that does a great job in supporting very, i mean, VERY important features (for me, that is) to write quickly in C++ complex codes. the only problem with this thing is that is a commercial product. The thing is a emacs tool called Xrefactory which does everything you can do on VC++ and better, but with the emacs advantages of not needing a f**cking window manager running.

I wonder how difficult was that? (btw, when i said years, i meant like 4 or 5 years, the amount of time i've been in linux). In my opinion, what this proves is that when open source developers try to do each one their own 'thingie' instead of >>_!_!_cooperate_!_!_<< we all end up having lots of codeblobs that each one does a small piece of the job fair acceptable, while failing at the rest. I mean, i've been following anjuta since it was 0.9. In that early days it promised C++ symbol autocompletion, which it failed. Up to date, that promise still waits. KDevelop has improved quite a bit since 2.0 series, specially in the code browsing and completion features. Still, its this little thing that annoys me to death and after using KDevelop for a while, develops as a severe PITA; im refering to the whole KDE/Qt thing. What is the f*ck*ng point of entangling an application with a gui manager is something that exceeds my human understanding. I understand that you may like stuff with nice guis, but damn, what happened with that excellent *nix paradigm; one job, one program? when we deranged trail so much?

I had to let out of my chest, so sorry if you dont feel this way, but something tells me that you do

Last edited by Hano; 12-09-2004 at 07:09 AM.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
udev takes long time to create /dev/usbhd symlink Yalla-One Slackware 4 04-04-2005 03:27 AM
/dev/ad4s2b not found! theeil *BSD 0 02-15-2005 05:06 PM
No /dev/dsp found Lokheed Linux - Hardware 2 10-09-2004 09:24 PM
/dev/dsp not found? Aman9090 Linux - Hardware 1 03-22-2004 12:33 PM
/dev/sequencer not found. scott231ca Linux - Hardware 14 10-24-2003 09:15 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - General

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:12 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration