Linux - GeneralThis Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Right, my query was simply why does the Kali system use more than the others. Obviously Kali does much more than day to day tasks for it not to run on an old Pentium 4 system with 512mb of RAM or may be 1GB in total available for it.
I imagine when i get the preowned system I'll use the ubuntu system, that will have onboard wifi network connectivity I guess too.
Kali(\Debian for one thing only) has light down to a netinst as well or just install Debian and whatever tools(\looks) you want to play with at your own risk.
Back on topic: have you checked out Distrowatch? I don't often like "reviews" but use them, (Many a seA so seaRch WiSely.) looking for both highest number of people and giving the most stars or whatever...
Distribution: Mainly Devuan, antiX, & Void, with Tiny Core, Fatdog, & BSD thrown in.
Posts: 5,499
Rep:
Quote:
Originally Posted by kalilinuxlivecd
I'm just puzzled as to why that wouldn't install on the Pentium 4, yet the lite 3 did and works fine on that.
Depends how the kernel was built, most old computers need a 486 or 586 build, slightly newer would use a 686 built, these are necessary because of the processors used.
Depends how the kernel was built, most old computers need a 486 or 586 build, slightly newer would use a 686 built, these are necessary because of the processors used.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.