LinuxQuestions.org
Help answer threads with 0 replies.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - General
User Name
Password
Linux - General This Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 04-07-2003, 08:48 PM   #16
MasterC
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Mar 2002
Location: Salt Lake City, UT - USA
Distribution: Gentoo ; LFS ; Kubuntu ; CentOS ; Raspbian
Posts: 12,613

Rep: Reputation: 69

Just to let you know...

I'm gonna research tonight, however:
1. I've definitely ran lilo while using ext2 filesystems. Definitely. Furthermore, lilo stands for "Linux Loader", how odd it would be for the "Linux Loader" to not load a standard linux filesystem (more than that, THE linux filesystem...).

2. LBA. Linux used to have that limitation. However, since (I am probably slightly off) 22.3 (at least) LBA has been a part of LILO.

Cool
 
Old 04-07-2003, 09:27 PM   #17
MasterC
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Mar 2002
Location: Salt Lake City, UT - USA
Distribution: Gentoo ; LFS ; Kubuntu ; CentOS ; Raspbian
Posts: 12,613

Rep: Reputation: 69
Ok, from the man page:
Code:
       -L     Generate 32-bit Logical Block Addresses instead  of
              C:H:S  addresses, allowing access to all partitions
              on disks with more than 1024 cylinders.
Still looking for info on ext2...
 
Old 04-07-2003, 09:30 PM   #18
MasterC
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Mar 2002
Location: Salt Lake City, UT - USA
Distribution: Gentoo ; LFS ; Kubuntu ; CentOS ; Raspbian
Posts: 12,613

Rep: Reputation: 69
Again, from the man:
Code:
INCOMPATIBILITIES
       lilo is known to have problems with  the  reiserfs  intro-
       duced  with  the  2.2.x kernels, unless the file system is
       mounted with the 'notail' option.  This incompatibilty has
       been resolved with reiserfs 3.6.18 and lilo 21.6.
So... It would appear that it works fine with ext2 (for several reasons, one if which is that it's not addressed in the "known issues" nor it is in the "todo" (which one would think that if the Linux Loader is having problems with THE native linux filesystem would be high on the TODO list..).



Cool
 
Old 04-07-2003, 09:36 PM   #19
MasterC
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Mar 2002
Location: Salt Lake City, UT - USA
Distribution: Gentoo ; LFS ; Kubuntu ; CentOS ; Raspbian
Posts: 12,613

Rep: Reputation: 69
Something everyone should read, fire up your xterm:
cd /usr/doc/lilo (then press tab). Read the INCOMPAT file. It describes the old LBA problems, how they've been fixed, and what you can do to fix them.

If /usr/doc/lilo(tab) doesn't exist, use locate to find your documentation directory and then read up on the lilo.



HTH

Cool
 
Old 04-08-2003, 06:12 PM   #20
tktim
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2003
Location: USA-Los Angeles, California
Distribution: Fedora 15
Posts: 119

Rep: Reputation: 16
Redhat Quote:

LILO versus GRUB
In general, LILO works similarly to GRUB except for three major differences:

· It has no interactive command interface.

· It stores information about the location of the kernel or other operating system it is to load on the MBR.

· It cannot read ext2 partitions.

The first point means the command prompt for LILO is not interactive and only allows one command with arguments.
The last two points mean that if you change LILO's configuration file or install a new kernel, you must rewrite the Stage 1 LILO boot loader to the MBR by using the following command:

/sbin/lilo -v –v

This method is more risky than the method used by GRUB because a misconfigured MBR leaves the system unbootable. With GRUB, if the configuration file is erroneously configured, it will default to its command line interface where the user can boot the system manually.


======

· GRUB can read ext2 partitions. This functionality allows GRUB to access its configuration file, /boot/grub/grub.conf, every time the system boots, eliminating the need for the user to write a new version of the first stage boot loader to MBR when configuration changes are made. The only time a user would need to reinstall GRUB on the MBR is if the physical location of the /boot partition is moved on the disk.
 
Old 04-08-2003, 07:12 PM   #21
MasterC
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Mar 2002
Location: Salt Lake City, UT - USA
Distribution: Gentoo ; LFS ; Kubuntu ; CentOS ; Raspbian
Posts: 12,613

Rep: Reputation: 69
I see, and agree I guess the wording, or mis-wording is what I disagree with. It cannot read ext2 partitions is quite misleading, unless one knows how grub works and what exactly they are comparing at that point

Thanks for the clarification though, maybe you should suggest a re-wording to RH about their docs

Cool
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Booting of raw ISO from GRUB/LILO (though preferably GRUB) Orkie Linux - Software 28 12-15-2013 09:37 PM
Switching from grub to lilo, messed up Lilo.conf, rescuing via Knoppix. SonicGT Debian 2 08-21-2005 01:15 PM
Lilo vs Grub - PROBLEM with lilo nelsonnery Linux - Software 2 09-09-2004 11:09 AM
Can't get rid of LILO or GRUB bootloaders to reinstall Windows on Laptop CorpChAoS Linux - Newbie 5 11-25-2003 01:23 AM
Changing bootloaders from lilo on RedHat to lilo on Mandrake Goatdemon Linux - General 3 06-10-2002 12:04 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - General

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:07 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration