LinuxQuestions.org
Help answer threads with 0 replies.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - General
User Name
Password
Linux - General This Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 02-09-2003, 05:31 PM   #1
fatpig
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2001
Distribution: mandrake
Posts: 87

Rep: Reputation: 15
bsd compared to linux


which os is more developed: bsd or linux?

as far as i know, bsd is like an open source spinoff of the original unix(it was made for at&t or something), and linux is a from-scratch linux clone.
 
Old 02-10-2003, 01:38 AM   #2
born4linux
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2002
Location: Philippines
Distribution: Slackware, RHEL&variants, AIX, SuSE
Posts: 1,127

Rep: Reputation: 49
speaking in terms of the packaging - linux is ahead of bsd (well, i've tried freebsd and i don't want to call it linux ).

bsd is very different if u are going to compare with Red Hat or Slackware or Mandrake. But it is very challenging to administer/configure.

experience is the best way to see the distinction so try it first. BSD does come with the GUI the you'll find in most distro so i suggest that you compare them in terms of the CLI. :P
 
Old 02-10-2003, 11:45 AM   #3
ghight
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2003
Location: Indiana
Distribution: Centos, RedHat Enterprise, Slackware
Posts: 524

Rep: Reputation: 30
As stated previously, BSD is from the original AT&T Unix. There are plenty of differences throughout both projects, but the biggest in my eyes is the philosophy behind them.

FreeBSD is much more rigid. You can't just drop off your source and have it added to the source tree. This rigidity helps keep the OS very stable and goal oriented. Basically, the programmers are very experienced and professional and are not going to drop a trojan into the source trees as a gag. The downside is the release time cycle. FreeBSD is developed as a whole and therefore released as a whole. This can seriously delay any new releases. BSD licenses are truly "free" also. Nobody owns them.

Linux can be developed by anyone and patches for software can be released at anytime whether the dependencies are there or not. This can expose some serious issues at upgrade time for a serious "backoffice". The upside is that bug fixes come almost overnight! Linux licensing is given by Linus himself. While it's "free", all of you programs must be "donated" to Linus first in order to get included on a CD.

Bear in mind that this is just a crude explanation. Sure some of the tools are different, but essentially they are the same to use and administer. BSD gets some bad press because it makes no assumptions as to how you want your box to perform. Linux does which can make initial setup easy to "get it running", but if you really want control of your box, you'd have to setup the exact same stuff in Linux also.
 
Old 02-10-2003, 01:27 PM   #4
llama_meme
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2001
Location: London, England
Distribution: Gentoo, FreeBSD
Posts: 590

Rep: Reputation: 30
Quote:
bsd is very different if u are going to compare with Red Hat or Slackware or Mandrake. But it is very challenging to administer/configure.
Depends...FreeBSD is much more tidy and logical than most Linux distros (or so I think, anyway), so once you're happy with using a command line, system configuration is very easy (especially with ports for installing new apps). Also, FreeBSD has a lot good documentation, so although you might need to edit/create the odd config file by hand, there's clear instructions on how to do so.

Alex
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How secure is Linux compared to windows? bongski55 Linux - Security 18 09-19-2005 06:23 PM
why is the fan lest active in linux compared to xp? webazoid Mandriva 1 05-13-2005 08:38 PM
Linux features as compared to Win2k SAEEDSHAH Linux - Newbie 5 01-31-2004 11:43 AM
Linux compared to DOS vitoal Linux - General 8 10-03-2002 07:51 AM
Another Linux Forum but not Compared to this One! trickykid General 4 06-10-2001 08:07 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - General

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:32 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration