Linux - GeneralThis Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Distribution: open SUSE 11.0, Fedora 7 and Mandriva 2007
Posts: 1,662
Rep:
A general question
Hi everybody
I haven't been here for a long time. Today I have a question.
Someone told me the hard drives don't spin when you are away from the computer for more than 20 or 30 minutes.
It was my understanding that the hard drives spins when the power is on whether you are away from the computer.
Is this true in Linux? I run Mandriva most of the time nowadays. Sometimes I run Ubuntu too.
I think Windows has a built in sleep mode.
Nowadays I run Mandriva most of the time.
Your thoughts are welcome.
Distribution: open SUSE 11.0, Fedora 7 and Mandriva 2007
Posts: 1,662
Original Poster
Rep:
Thanks David Do you think default settings have ample scope for the power saving or rather to put the system into sleeping mode when you are away for a long time?
HDD has its own controlle system. I worked on ATA interface, CPU doesnt read write data on the HDD like RAM, its communicates through HDD interface, which communicate to the HDD controller. HDD controller is responsible for reading and writting data and rotation of moters. All the data is read and write sector by sector. when there is need of read and write, CPU communicates through ATA interface, interface sets commands for reading writing operation, interface waits till busy system of HDD, after that it reads and writes complete sector. HDD moter works only for read and write opeartion on sectors and trackes and head.
Read/write operation is usually done when you are getting data, applicaion is getting data, OS is getting data, or for pagging. othere wise there is no operation on moters.
Our friend rweaver says he doesn't care about shutting down the rotation of the hard drives when he is away from the computers for a long time.
I think you increase the longevity of the hard drive by disallowing to rotate. Am I wrong here?
Absolutely it can, but a drive failure is likely not going to be the end of your drive... time will be. I've got 20g drives and 80g drives I have no use for sitting around. I don't even use the interface they're on any more (old eide/ide and scsi-2 and now I'm using sata and ultra-320). I typically buy drives with a 3 or 5 year warranty and run them in a mirrored raid, so I rarely run the risk of losing data (and I back up on top of it to be safe) In my experience a drive will fail either in the first 3 months of operation or after 5 years even when in constant use. If you're keeping the same drives for >5 years on a desktop... if you just got done with an upgrade cycle and bought new drives today your previous drive would have likely been an eide (sata was out but not in popular use) in the <150gb range. The standards are moving fast, even a sata drive from several years ago isn't a drive I'd put in a new computer because of the difference in the sata interface (1/2).
You have a higher chance of your video, power, motherboard, or ram failing in 5 years than the drive in my experience, although I can't yet speak for the longevity of the solid state drives.
Distribution: open SUSE 11.0, Fedora 7 and Mandriva 2007
Posts: 1,662
Original Poster
Rep:
ronlau wrote the following:
Yes and No
It depend on the construction of you're drive and where it is made for.
------------------------------------------------------------ I think all hard drives are rotten. It doesn't matter whether it is Seagate or IBM. They go to hell.
If it happens within the warranty period, you could send it to the manufacturer.
They are in the Netherlands. I did this almost a year ago. They never send a new hard drive. They sent me a refurbished one. It went to hell in 6 months.
I talk to them on the phone and begged to send a brand new one just after sending the broken hard drive. They didn't oblige to me.
[ If your hard drive is damaged, just go to the manufacturer's home page and find out the guarantee period. It will ask you to write all the numbers written on the hard drive.]
---------------------------------------------------------------
To be candid, I have some difficulty in understanding what Shoail says here.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.