LinuxQuestions.org
Share your knowledge at the LQ Wiki.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - General
User Name
Password
Linux - General This Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 03-27-2002, 04:31 PM   #16
KayJay
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2002
Location: dev/null
Distribution: redhat, mandrake
Posts: 218

Rep: Reputation: 30

then tell me why people should use word if u can do the same thing with openoffice? (opening word documents)
if u type ls in dos so much , yes it happens to me all the time as well , make a simple .bat file named ls. and put it in the c:\windows dir?

what I'm trying to tell here is that why are people trying to run linux applications on an unstable system like windows?
don't take me wrong here but what is the difference between the media player in linux and a media player in windows??

I also regret I have to run windows @ work, but that is not a reason to install linux applications on it. why should I . I choose linux for the commandline and the stability. not a special software issue.

I tried cygwin ones. and yes its cool that it works in windows, but where is the power of the commandline??
 
Old 03-27-2002, 04:42 PM   #17
ChaosX2
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2001
Location: Sacramento, CA
Distribution: Gentoo 1.4+
Posts: 195

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30
Quote:
Originally posted by KayJay
then tell me why people should use word if u can do the same thing with openoffice? (opening word documents)
if u type ls in dos so much , yes it happens to me all the time as well , make a simple .bat file named ls. and put it in the c:\windows dir?

what I'm trying to tell here is that why are people trying to run linux applications on an unstable system like windows?
don't take me wrong here but what is the difference between the media player in linux and a media player in windows??

I also regret I have to run windows @ work, but that is not a reason to install linux applications on it. why should I . I choose linux for the commandline and the stability. not a special software issue.

I tried cygwin ones. and yes its cool that it works in windows, but where is the power of the commandline??
I can't understand your ignorant statments. Just because you don't see a reason for it doesn't mean someone else doesn't.
My biggest reason for having it is because I've taken some linux/unix classes at school and I like to test out the new material in class on my laptop, but I don't have enough harddrive space to install a dual boot system.

Side Comments:
By the way open office does not format all word documents correctly. There is a big difference between mplayer and windows media player.
 
Old 03-27-2002, 04:45 PM   #18
acid_kewpie
Moderator
 
Registered: Jun 2001
Location: UK
Distribution: Gentoo, RHEL, Fedora, Centos
Posts: 43,417

Rep: Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985
Quote:
Originally posted by KayJay
then tell me why people should use word if u can do the same thing with openoffice? (opening word documents)
if u type ls in dos so much , yes it happens to me all the time as well , make a simple .bat file named ls. and put it in the c:\windows dir?
because openoffice is shit IMHO slow, restrictive and annoying..., while Word is by FAR the best wordprocessor. I'd like to pretend it's not, but i gotta admit it really.
 
Old 03-27-2002, 04:45 PM   #19
trickykid
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Jan 2001
Posts: 24,149

Rep: Reputation: 269Reputation: 269Reputation: 269
I hope everyone noticed my previous post. Thanks. Lets stay calm please and keep it clean.

-trickykid

Last edited by trickykid; 03-27-2002 at 04:47 PM.
 
Old 03-27-2002, 04:56 PM   #20
ChaosX2
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2001
Location: Sacramento, CA
Distribution: Gentoo 1.4+
Posts: 195

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30
Quote:
Originally posted by trickykid
I hope everyone noticed my previous post. Thanks. Lets stay calm please and keep it clean.

-trickykid
just read it and totally agree. No more flames from me.
 
Old 03-27-2002, 05:07 PM   #21
KayJay
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2002
Location: dev/null
Distribution: redhat, mandrake
Posts: 218

Rep: Reputation: 30
ok. mods are right about keaping things calm. I'm ok with that.
but I want to keep this discussion open.
I told my opionion about the use of linux/unix apps on a windows box. maybe it sounded cruel. but hey this is how I am.

I have a comment on the fact that word is the best wordprocessor.
it's not that I hate MS, (yes I really do ) but I had more problems with word IMHO then with openoffice or staroffice.
@ work I had 4 hours work because of the fact that word crashes on some documents. some bug in winword.exe.
each time I open it. word crashes.
only sollution. opening it in staroffice. converting it to ascii , use Write, wordpad or whatever and cleaning the shit up. then back to word and restoring the document.
OpenOffice might be slow sometimes , but it never crashes on particular documents.

when I started to screw around with linux a few years ago because I was interested I didnt had the possibilty to dual boot either. I took the go or no go , and fdisked my entire system.
I was too dumb enough to understand that I wasnt ready for the system I was installing: slackware. I switched to mandrake to learn more about the system. I did everything I needed on mandrake, office applications, oracle databases, music, etc.
I hear people complaining about that software issue. I still can't figure out why u choose a certain OS just because of that. in my opionion there are always alternatives on both sides. I still can't figure an app that doesnt work on linux or the other way around.
@ the moment I might be proud to say I don't need windows anymore. so I won't port windows on my linux box. when I'm @ work I have to use windows. if I would need linux things on a windows box. why not using VNC to another machine? or ssh?
there are much better sollutions to it
PS.
I never tried VI as the windows binary. I only use it on my linux box. and yes it owns compared to notepad
 
Old 03-27-2002, 06:14 PM   #22
taz.devil
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2001
Location: Wa. State
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 1,261

Rep: Reputation: 45
Just buy a MAC!!
 
Old 03-28-2002, 05:08 AM   #23
fatgod
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2002
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland
Distribution: Suse 7.2, Gentoo 1.4, Solaris 9
Posts: 661

Rep: Reputation: 30
Hehehe.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
why *nix is better in than windows XP Pro alaindu Linux - Networking 2 06-23-2005 08:09 AM
Does *nix allows floating windows. montylee Other *NIX 1 11-29-2004 08:17 AM
MySQL: Convert Windows DB to *nix? carmstrong Linux - Software 1 05-18-2004 01:10 PM
Running Windows/Programs/Games in Nix tripp Linux - Newbie 4 10-22-2003 05:08 PM
*NIX Script Executing from Windows chrisk5527 Linux - General 7 05-02-2003 05:29 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - General

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:40 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration