Linux From ScratchThis Forum is for the discussion of LFS.
LFS is a project that provides you with the steps necessary to build your own custom Linux system.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I've been experimenting with with ZFS (once known as the Zettabyte File System) as a filesystem to host LFS/BLFS using the SVN version of both. I've built support for ZFS using these tarballs: spl-0.6.1.tar.gz and zfs-0.6.1.tar.gz, supplied from http://zfsonlinux.org/.
Since I roll my own initramfs, I can mount the ZFS datasets just fine and boot into the ZFS-based system without any problems at all. I realize this is an advanced topic and a search for ZFS confined to this forum yields this result:
Sorry - no matches. Please try some different terms.
Is there anyone else out there trying LFS and ZFS? If so, what have been your experiences?
Why use ZFS as opposed to the more common ext* systems? What are the advantages?
To a large extent, much like the Linux from Scratch approach itself, ZFS represents another learning experience. In my case, there's no compelling reason for ZFS since LVM (with ext4 atop it as the filesystem) fulfills the need to expand the storage when needed. Nevertheless, the Wikipedia article does reveal the benefits of ZFS, particularly in large datacenters where so-called "silent corruption" can't be tolerated.
In any event, in my nearly-decade of using LFS as my primary daily computing environment, migrating one of my LFS platforms to ZFS has been a rewarding, sometimes frustrating but overall fun journey.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.