LFS-Hypervisor

ReaperX7 · 06-21-2016, 11:36 AM

I would avoid CLFS. The project isn't as up-to-date as LFS. It's useful if you want a more complete system, but LFS is better suited.

biosboy4 · 06-21-2016, 01:05 PM

So basically, if I want 64 bit then stay away from lfs altogether? I guess I'll go with Arch or Tinycore to run the hyper-visor.

ReaperX7 · 06-22-2016, 02:32 AM

No. Just use the main LFS book.

CLFS is different from LFS.

tnut · 06-22-2016, 05:23 AM

full agreed. and if you need both arch, do a 32bit AND a 64 bit LFS

biosboy4 · 06-22-2016, 08:58 AM

I just need 64 bit, but I was under the impression LFS was 32 bit only.

luvr · 06-22-2016, 03:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by biosboy4

I just need 64 bit, but I was under the impression LFS was 32 bit only.

I think LFS used to be limited to 32-bit for quite a long time, but nowadays it supports both the 64-bit and 32-bit architectures.
See LFS Target Architectures.