Hello

As requested in my previous thread "gcc 5.3.0 pass 1 compilation failed", i have erased all files and directories in $LFS and have make new compilations of binutils (success) and gcc 5.2.0 (failed)

To give answer to all previous questions :

output of versions installed on the host :
Checking library :
In the config.log (in $LFS/gcc_build :
Before running make : no "--with-cloog"
After running make : "--with-cloog" was written by ???
Extracted lines are :
I suppose the configure script (./configure) has recovered themselves from the host, many other options too.

The end of the make command is :
I attach the config.log if needed, and the script created for the command ./configure

The was the problem before i had supposed gcc5.2.0 has a bug and the problem was the same with gcc5.3.0.

If you have ideas ....

Thanks in advance

Herve49

Attached Files

	config.log (28.1 KB, 17 views)
	configure.txt (508 Bytes, 16 views)

The error log seems to be the same as in the post here: http://www.linuxquestions.org/questi...fs-4175558261/

This particular case was related to "steps involving mpfr, gmp, and mpc". Can you double check you did this correctly (unpacking these three packages within gcc source directory)?

Sorry for the late response : it was lunch time (abendessen in german).

That's exactly the same error (only the makefile line is not the same).

steps involving mpfr, gmp, mpc was correctly made, and isl.

I send attached a print screen of the directory of source/gcc
All lines of the book was respected (i have it in french, so there no problem to understand correctly)

Herve49

Attached Thumbnails

 

Looking at the attached files you are not following the book exactly, like you were told to do in a previous thread, this is what you should be doing:If you have deviated by this already then you have probably made other mistakes/changes, start again and stick to the book, do not use any differant commands, even if its just changeing the build directory.

Keith they have changed it now on 7.9 and the svn version

"mkdir -v build
cd build"

thats with gcc-5.3.0

opps 5.2.0 but dont think thats he problem

I didn't really think that would be the OP's problem it's just indicative of not following the LFS book exactly and would tend to indicate he may have made other changes, just trying to get him to follow instructions.

Didn't know 7.9 was out yet.

yea it,s rc but uses 5.3 gcc

Hello to all

For Keith :

Sorry but you must explain the reason of your response.

From the book "mkdir -v ../gcc-build // cd ../gcc-build ", this party was made by me.
This commands create out of the sources directory a new directory gcc-build. I have
The only difference is gcc_build.
Would this the reason of the failed compilation ?

For the command line "Prepare GCC for compilation: ../gcc-5.2.0/configure \ ...."
what is the difference between enter the commands on the command line and enter the commands in an executable file ?
Sure my script contains ../sources/gcc5.2.0/configure instead ../gcc-5.2.0/configure.
The more important is to have the right path to acces the source directory.
Only if you say (and explain) this is not the same, i would heard.

Why an executable file ?
If i make an error and do restart from new, i have not to write another time this very long command line.

So i see not where is the problem between the book and what i have made.

I think it's better for me to leave my project.

Sorry

Herve49

Abendessen = supper, no?

Anyway, there is no mention of isl in 7.8, so don't do that. Assuming you have done everything step by step correctly, and still giving errors, I'm starting to blame the host OS. I have no experience with PCLinuxOS. According to distrowatch it is a fork of Mandriva. Wasn't there some issues with Mandriva-derivative host with LFS (or was it Fedora, something like that).

If you haven't found a solution yet, my other suggestion would be to use Salix Live CD as a host. You don't need to install it, just use it as live system. I've used it to build LFS myself and had no problem out of the box.

Kcirik

Thanks for your reply.

Yes PCLinuxOS is a fork of Mandriva, the maintainer is Bill Reynolds (alias Textar) : he was before the year 2000 (?) at Mandriva.

To fellow your advice, i will change the host OS (on another partition).
Please, have YOU a preference ?

I don't like .deb based OS's.
If you have a preference for a rpm based OS, i will try to create the LFS OS.

Herve49

Most of us are familiar and have found no problem with Slackware linux. My personal suggestion is Salix (Slackware-derivative), because it has Live CD option. (I can't access the Salix webpage because it is blocked - the firewall thinks it's a gaming website, just google for Salix OS). With Live CD, you don't need to install it, so you don't need to dedicate a separate partition for the host.

If you don't like live CD, then I'm sure everyone here would agree Slackware is the best choice.

Very thanks Kcirik

I will try with Slackware with the hope all will be pretty during and after the install.

In the past, i had try to install Debian, Linuxmint, Slackware,then Redhat, Suze, but i'm always fast returned to PCLinuxOS.

Herve49

Just a last question.

Can I built LFS in a virtual machine ?

To be more clear : is it possible to build LFS in a Slack installed in VirtualBox ?

Herve49

The first few times you build LFS you are better off sticking strictly to the book, by all means put your commands in a script but run them from the command line first, to make sure there are no problems, scripting commands can introduce subtle problems that would be immediatly obvious when using the command line, we are trying to give you good advice but if you are going to ignore what experienced LFS builders are going to ttell you you wont get much joy with fixing your problems, it's up to you really, take the advice of the people who have done this a few times or dont.

That should be fine, but then your built LFS system will stay in VirtualBox.

Good luck!