LinuxQuestions.org
Review your favorite Linux distribution.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Enterprise Linux Forums > Linux - Enterprise
User Name
Password
Linux - Enterprise This forum is for all items relating to using Linux in the Enterprise.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 01-31-2005, 06:54 AM   #1
genderbender
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: US
Distribution: Centos, Ubuntu, Solaris, Redhat
Posts: 396

Rep: Reputation: 31
A secure enterprise?


Hi I'm writing a project based on securing a school network. I'm not asking for help in any way with my project, just opinion.

Currently the school has solaris 8 as there enterprise server. I was just interested in what people considered the most secure linux distribution. At the moment I'm edging towards redhat or updating there solaris system to solaris 10. So what does everyone else think? The school has around 300 computers.


Thanks
 
Old 01-31-2005, 11:41 AM   #2
acidmax
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jan 2004
Location: Vienna, Austria
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 2

Rep: Reputation: 0
For me it is Debian(-stable). For others - RedHat AS/ES...
 
Old 02-02-2005, 04:55 PM   #3
Builder
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2004
Location: London
Distribution: Red Hat, SuSE, Gentoo
Posts: 80

Rep: Reputation: 15
All Linux distributions can be as secure as each other - security primarily comes from configuration choices. Having said this, some have stronger configurations by default. The only way a distribution could be less secure than others would be if the vendor does not release patches, but then, you would be free to resolve this with by building your own packages if needed.

Any distribution that Bastille-linux is compatible with is a good choice. Red Hat AS is far more expensive than Solaris, so this isn't a good choice really.

If you're really looking for good default security, take a look at OpenBSD (yeah, I know - it's not Linux ) - but there are compromises here.

For off the shelf I tend to recommend SuSE just based on value for money and availability of support. For smaller organisations, Red Hat is just too expensive. SuSE do a good distro and their support is solid.
 
Old 02-02-2005, 06:33 PM   #4
genderbender
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: US
Distribution: Centos, Ubuntu, Solaris, Redhat
Posts: 396

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 31
Thanks everyone, that was very insightful. I'll have a look into openBSD. I've got suse on my home machine and I like it a lot. Guess it all comes down to school personal preferences and most of all cash
 
Old 03-06-2005, 06:47 PM   #5
enigmasoldier
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: Florence, Ky
Distribution: CentOS 3.3-4, OpenBSD 3.3, Fedora Core 4, Ubuntu, Novell Open Enterprise Server
Posts: 213

Rep: Reputation: 30
Centos 4 is based off of Redhat Enterprise Linux 4 which employs a few guys to impliment the NSA's SELinux security system for many services (Bind, Apache, NFS, etc) It's damn secure!
 
Old 03-08-2005, 10:10 PM   #6
jjohnston62
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: Minnesota, USA
Distribution: RedHat, Suse
Posts: 106

Rep: Reputation: 15
Heck, the most secure distribution is the one installed by someone who really cares about security! I work with a number of sites on security and it is amazing how many of them still install systems with lousy passwords.

The best software on the planet is easily compromised by ignorance and/or plain-ass laziness.

Jon Johnston
Creative Business Solutions
IBM, Microsoft, Novell/Suse and Sophos Consulting
952-544-1108
http://www.cbsol.com
Blog:http://bingo.cbsol.com
 
Old 03-26-2005, 01:41 PM   #7
stevie_velvet
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2004
Location: Italia + UK
Distribution: RHEL 4 + Fedora FC5
Posts: 118

Rep: Reputation: 15
Solaris 8 is just as secure as any industy-strength linux, & Solaris 10 is the first *nix to implemet RBAC ~ a extar security layer for applications\users, where access is 'delegated'

1 HUGE plus between *nix (UNIX\LINUX) over Microsoft Server OS's is that any box can be customized so much it can unrecognisable to a hacker, looking to identify it & possible vuner
abilites, hence the ideal-abiltiy for DMZ use,e.g. Mail Server, Web Server ~ 1 such server is still running unpatched over 4 years...
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
VSFTPD with secure & non-secure logins Ricci Graham Linux - Software 6 02-24-2020 11:49 PM
Secure email (SSL vs. secure authentication) jrdioko Linux - Newbie 2 11-28-2004 01:39 PM
Update kernel from kernel-enterprise-2.4.9-e.3 to kernel-enterprise-2.4.9-e.8 imsajjadali Red Hat 0 01-24-2004 12:41 AM
Update kernel from kernel-enterprise-2.4.9-e.3 to kernel-enterprise-2.4.9-e.8 imsajjadali Linux - Software 4 01-17-2004 12:38 PM
vsftpd very very secure, so secure i can't use it... baronsam Linux - Networking 4 10-06-2003 06:12 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Enterprise Linux Forums > Linux - Enterprise

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:20 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration