Linux - DistributionsThis forum is for Distribution specific questions.
Red Hat, Slackware, Debian, Novell, LFS, Mandriva, Ubuntu, Fedora - the list goes on and on...
Note: An (*) indicates there is no official participation from that distribution here at LQ.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Hi all, got another n00b question here... something that i don't fully understand, or may have understood wrongly...
What is the significance of the different Linux distros? Or rather, what is the concept of distros? What is the difference/similarity across two different distros?
What i had previously (and wrongly) thought was that a distro is a collection of a kernel, and a default set of libraries (or packages), and default customized configurations for some of the packages. So the difference between the distros is that one distro could probably "bundle" one set of libraries with this default configuration, while another would bundle a different set with some different configuration, and maybe the kernel versions may be different.
And my wrong thinking extended to: Packages (libraries) are universal, so to install a package, you just have to apt-get (or its equivalent) the package and its dependencies.
All my wrong thinking were challenged on two occasions:
1. I found that the Firefox that came "bundled" with my Ubuntu 5.10 installation was a "Ubuntu-specific build (of ver 1.0.7)". Nevertheless, i could still download the "generic" version 1.5 of Firefox from the Mozilla website and use.
2. Gaim seems to have specific builds for Fedora Core, Mandriva, among others. In fact, it has different builds for FC1, FC2, FC3 and FC4, no less.
So, all my previous understanding of distros was thrown way out of the window.
Distibutions are bundlings of the Linux kernel, gnu tools, supporting software and libraries as well as vendor specific tools. Each distribution uses the Linux kernel, but the version of the kernel and patches applied to it may not necessarily be the same in each distro. Also distros tend to do things differently e.g. in terms of package management, paths where packages are installed and scipts they use to boot up. Think of distros as operating systems that are very similar but with subtle differences.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.