Linux - Distributions This forum is for Distribution specific questions.
Red Hat, Slackware, Debian, Novell, LFS, Mandriva, Ubuntu, Fedora - the list goes on and on... |
| Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
 |
GNU/Linux Basic Guide
This 255-page guide will provide you with the keys to understand the philosophy of free software, teach you how to use and handle it, and give you the tools required to move easily in the world of GNU/Linux. Many users and administrators will be taking their first steps with this GNU/Linux Basic guide and it will show you how to approach and solve the problems you encounter.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free. |
|
 |
07-11-2003, 08:42 AM
|
#1
|
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: Ashland, OR
Distribution: Mandrake 9.1
Posts: 3
Rep:
|
What's the best Linux Dist. for an old PC???
I've got an Old PII 200Mhz PC with 64MB RAM and a 6GB Hard Disk. I put Windows 98SE on and have also installed Mandrake 9.1 because I had heard that if you're a total Linux Newbie (like me) that it's a good place to start. I've used it a few times but it's soooooo slow on this old PC.
Can anybody tell me if they know of a Linux distrobution that would work the best on this system but still have fairly up to date features?
Any help is greatly appreciated. Thank you.
|
|
|
|
07-11-2003, 10:11 AM
|
#2
|
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Jul 2003
Posts: 1
Rep:
|
best linux for old box
if it was my box and i wanted it to be quicker, i would put redhat 6.2. don't get high hopes about a lot of GUI. there is a Xserver but not much of one. there are security issues,, as with every release, but 6.2 is pretty solid. 
|
|
|
|
07-11-2003, 10:46 AM
|
#4
|
|
Member
Registered: Jul 2003
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 384
Rep:
|
Slackware 9.0 would run fine on it. I have Slackware 9.0 on a 486 and 32MB RAM (I don't have the GUI stuff installed, though).
Last edited by lyle_s; 07-11-2003 at 11:05 AM.
|
|
|
|
07-11-2003, 12:07 PM
|
#5
|
|
Member
Registered: Feb 2003
Location: Sunny Southport, again.
Distribution: PCLinuxOS 0.93 and 0.92, Vector sometimes
Posts: 825
Rep:
|
Vector linux would be an ideal choice on that machine. There is a beta 4.0 version available now. Go to distrowatch.com and have a look.
|
|
|
|
07-11-2003, 01:56 PM
|
#6
|
|
Member
Registered: Jul 2003
Posts: 658
Rep:
|
How about Debian Woody? (It works!)
|
|
|
|
07-11-2003, 02:56 PM
|
#7
|
|
Member
Registered: Jun 2003
Distribution: SuSE, Slackware, Gentoo
Posts: 207
Rep:
|
I would use Slackware 9 (like Lyle said) and run 'make menuconfig' to disable some of the more recent features that take advantage of newer technologies. You will also want to run 'chmod' on alot of RC files (/etc/rc.d.) This will help streamline the OS and keep your overhead low. A few months ago I was running RH8 on my Pentium 233 with KDE over X-windows and didn't have any issues.
|
|
|
|
07-11-2003, 02:57 PM
|
#8
|
|
LQ Addict
Registered: Jul 2002
Location: Montreal
Distribution: Gentoo 2004 from stage 1 baby!
Posts: 1,403
Rep:
|
look up Deli linux, I saw it earlier this week and it looks interesting...MADE for older machines 
|
|
|
|
07-15-2003, 05:04 PM
|
#9
|
|
Member
Registered: Jun 2003
Location: miami florida
Distribution: slackware 9.0
Posts: 128
Rep:
|
freebsd would run fine on it also
|
|
|
|
07-15-2003, 07:39 PM
|
#10
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Feb 2003
Location: Calif, USA
Distribution: Linux Mint 12
Posts: 2,838
Rep:
|
Quote:
|
I've got an Old PII 200Mhz PC with 64MB RAM and a 6GB Hard Disk.
|
Those are not very bad specs. But they are not optimal for running a default install of a current distribution (with KDE or Gnome).
Carlywarly's suggestion of Vector Linux is good. Vector seems to be the best choice for a default install (including Xwindows) to a lower end PC. Yours is a notch better than this. Peanut Linux has slightly higher requirements (can't find the current on a quick check) but is similar in that is offers a small install with current programs using lower resources than the mainstream distributions.
Using something like the ICE desktop rather than KDE or Gnome (with your current Mandrake install) may be all that is needed to give you a good comprimise between speed and availability of programs.
Good Luck.
|
|
|
|
07-15-2003, 07:54 PM
|
#11
|
|
Member
Registered: Feb 2003
Posts: 482
Rep:
|
i have vector running on a 233mhz, 141 ram (that's actual, reconized is only 53), and a 2 gig hd. it's wonderful, if you want a gui on it there won't be a problem unless you use kde, or gnome. you could load a window manager, i.e., fluxbox, blackbox, waimea, icewm,...., instead of a windowing enviroment like kde or gnome. this would help you out with the speed of the graphics and you would still be able to use kde and gnome apps. for a beginner i would recommend ice, you dont' have as many hidden links and menus that the other's have.
cheers.
|
|
|
|
07-15-2003, 09:25 PM
|
#12
|
|
Member
Registered: Jun 2003
Location: miami florida
Distribution: slackware 9.0
Posts: 128
Rep:
|
or try out the blackbox window manager it doesnt use up that much resources and looks nice enough to use (i use it all the time)
|
|
|
|
01-14-2007, 10:01 PM
|
#13
|
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Feb 2006
Distribution: CentOS 3.8,Fedora 6
Posts: 6
Rep:
|
old PC,updated linux
I have tried many flavors of linux on hand me down PC's,I installed CentOS 3.8 last month completely updated 2.4 kernel.It installed and runs flawlessly. CentOS 2 fully updated is also available for even older PC's. This is an updated copy of the red hat dist...
go here to check it out www.centos.org
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:56 AM.
|
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|