LinuxQuestions.org
Share your knowledge at the LQ Wiki.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions
User Name
Password
Linux - Distributions This forum is for Distribution specific questions.
Red Hat, Slackware, Debian, Novell, LFS, Mandriva, Ubuntu, Fedora - the list goes on and on... Note: An (*) indicates there is no official participation from that distribution here at LQ.

Notices



Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 07-12-2006, 08:13 AM   #1
leibinitz
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jun 2005
Posts: 8

Rep: Reputation: 0
Suitable Distribution for my LOW MEMORY(128 MB) PC


I am looking for a Linux Distribution that will run reasonably fast on my PC. The following is my configuration:-

1) Processor : Intel Pentium 4 ,1.6GHz,256KB onboard Cache
2) Memory :128 MB SDRAM
3) External Cache Memory : 256KB
4) Video Card : SiS 300/305 with 32MB RAM

Mainly,I use my PC for :-
1) Web Browsing
2) Developing Console Applications in 'C'
3) WordProcessing
4) Writing Data to CD.
5) Listening to music(mp3 format) and Watching Movies ,and
6) As a Personal desktop

Note:-
I have already tried Fedora Core4,Ubuntu/Kubuntu 5.10 and Mandriva 2006.
 
Old 07-12-2006, 08:54 AM   #2
b0uncer
Guru
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Distribution: CentOS, OS X
Posts: 5,131

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Well those you've tried are quite "big" (or fat, actually) distributions with a lot of stuff you won't need and a lot of heavy graphical stuff. I'd advice you to buy a bit more SDRAM anyway, at least up to 256 (I'd make it 384, at least)

You surely can use those too, but don't try to use KDE or Gnome if you are having problems with insufficient memory; replace KDE or Gnome with XFCE (a "lightweight" desktop) or Fluxbox or some other *box, or whatever window manager pleases you. KDE and Gnome do look good, but they're memory hogs (well the whole X is anyway, I'd just use console..you can watch videos from console too, if you like).

Another thing is that you should shut down every process (service) you do not need. The distributions are quite the same, they have a kernel, a set of apps and a way to put those in some order on the disk. The thing to make a Linux faster is to lessen the amount of running processes (programs) and to use less memory-consuming programs, especially those graphical ones running under X. Switching your desktop to a lighter one will make a big difference.
 
Old 07-13-2006, 03:09 AM   #3
leibinitz
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jun 2005
Posts: 8

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
Thank you for the prompt reply
 
Old 07-13-2006, 03:43 AM   #4
Old_Fogie
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2006
Distribution: SLACKWARE 4TW! =D
Posts: 1,515

Rep: Reputation: 62
you didnt say you'r hard drive space, if you can afford to have KDE isntalled but use flux as your primary window manager like bouncer said is key.

I run slackware on a pc 1/10 your speed, fluxbox as the window manager, but I can use the KDE app's if need be, and what I do is load up KDE once and strip down the eye-candy really hard, so when I'm in fluxbox and need a kde appliction, it's not all glossy, and resource intense. taking out the auto start stuff in kde is good if you do this, cuz even calling for "kedit" will make all the kde stuff load.......
 
Old 07-14-2006, 01:10 AM   #5
RoaCh Of DisCor
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2004
Location: Washington State
Distribution: SuSE 9.3 / Slackware-Current
Posts: 701

Rep: Reputation: 30
I highly suggest xubuntu (www.xubuntu.org)

Check it out.
 
Old 07-14-2006, 11:02 AM   #6
ctkroeker
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2005
Location: Paraguay
Posts: 1,565
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 50
Yep, Xubuntu is the way to go. It's really improved after the last release.
 
Old 07-19-2006, 09:00 PM   #7
apt-get-dude
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2006
Posts: 98

Rep: Reputation: 15
I would probably suggest to go to bestbuy, buy $50 worth of ram and then install any version of your choice. It's a shame to limit a p4 with such little ram.

Else, try xubuntu. Not a bad choice.
 
Old 07-19-2006, 09:59 PM   #8
IsaacKuo
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2004
Location: Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA
Distribution: Debian 4.0 Etch
Posts: 1,349

Rep: Reputation: 49
I have no problems running KDE within 128megs of RAM using Debian 3.1 (Sarge) or Debian Testing (Etch). I find that turning off font anti-aliasing helps a lot with performance.

I used a 550mhz Pentium III system with 128megs of RAM to burn all of my DVD-ROM backups for quite some time before I got my hands on some more RAM. This was with Debian 3.1, using KDE. I was quite satisfied with its performance.
 
Old 07-20-2006, 05:35 AM   #9
jacook
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2005
Location: Townsville, Australia
Distribution: PCLinuxOS .93 Junior
Posts: 437

Rep: Reputation: 30
VectorLinux

http://www.vectorlinux.com/

Puppy Linux

http://www.puppylinux.org/user/viewpage.php?page_id=1

Slackware

http://www.slackware.com/

Debian

http://www.debian.org/

Damn Small Linux

http://www.damnsmalllinux.org/

BeatrIX
http://www.watsky.net/

Linux distribution Chooser: http://www.zegeniestudios.net/ldc/

hope this Helps,

Jake

Last edited by jacook; 07-20-2006 at 05:52 AM.
 
Old 07-20-2006, 06:53 AM   #10
leibinitz
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jun 2005
Posts: 8

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
Thanks for all the responses
 
Old 08-22-2006, 04:06 PM   #11
leibinitz
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jun 2005
Posts: 8

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
I have started using Vector Linux 5.1
 
Old 08-28-2006, 07:27 AM   #12
xcristi
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2005
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 35

Rep: Reputation: 16
I've made some tests lately and it's surprinsing that KDE 3.5.4 (installed from packages on a Slack) is less eating memory than XFCE or other desktops envs.

I personally thinl that latest KDE is highly optimized and will run nice in 128 RAM.
 
Old 09-01-2006, 12:59 PM   #13
leibinitz
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jun 2005
Posts: 8

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
Thanks for the information. I am thinking of running KDE3.5.4 using Kubuntu 6.06.1
 
Old 09-02-2006, 09:01 AM   #14
Mark1234
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Aug 2006
Location: netherlands
Distribution: pclinuxos
Posts: 15

Rep: Reputation: 0
Lightbulb

i suggest pclinuxos i use it now on a computer with :
128mb
intel pentium III 937

so it have to work on a 128mb with pentium 4 i think

________________________

registered newbie : Mark1234
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Linux Distribution suitable for my need muni Linux - Newbie 5 03-29-2005 06:36 AM
Old laptop, looking for a suitable distribution nakedshrew Linux - Newbie 5 01-27-2005 04:32 AM
suitable distro for PI-150MHz with 128 MB RAM drvinoy Linux - Hardware 4 02-08-2004 02:39 PM
suitable distro for PI-150MHz with 128 MB RAM drvinoy Linux - Newbie 1 02-08-2004 10:45 AM
Dual-cpu 450Mhx AP400 suitable as a low-cost server? melquiades Linux - General 2 11-06-2003 05:42 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:02 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration