Linux - DistributionsThis forum is for Distribution specific questions.
Red Hat, Slackware, Debian, Novell, LFS, Mandriva, Ubuntu, Fedora - the list goes on and on...
Note: An (*) indicates there is no official participation from that distribution here at LQ.
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Introduction to Linux - A Hands on Guide
This guide was created as an overview of the Linux Operating System, geared toward new users as an exploration tour and getting started guide, with exercises at the end of each chapter.
For more advanced trainees it can be a desktop reference, and a collection of the base knowledge needed to proceed with system and network administration. This book contains many real life examples derived from the author's experience as a Linux system and network administrator, trainer and consultant. They hope these examples will help you to get a better understanding of the Linux system and that you feel encouraged to try out things on your own.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free.
i looking into using the scientific linux (sl) distribution, but before i do, i'd like to get opinions from people who have experience with it.
does anyone have any opinions about it? good, bad, whatever. here are some questions for those who have it installed.
- what is you application (desktop,industrial,etc..).
- is it easy to install?
- how small can it get? i'm like to trim i down to <1gb, but <2gb is ok.
- is it easy to maintain updates and security patches?
I tried Scientific because I thought it might have more science/engineering/math applications available in its repositories. I was wrong, I think it has fewer. I ended up getting rid of it because I didn't like the way it "felt". I did keep its GRUB menu image...it's an atom, kinda cool.
1. It's a desktop and is very much like Fedora. Scientific is a Red Hat derivative.
2. Yes. If you can install Fedora, you can install Scientific.
3. I installed it with a KDE and I think it came in around 3.5GB. You can probably get it in under 2GB, but it might be tough. I think Scientific offers XFCE as a window manager and that might do it. Once again, it's similar to a Fedora installation.
4. As a Red Hat derivative, it uses yum for updates. I think yum is pretty easy to use and does a decent job. There are several GUI frontends for yum but I always use it from the CLI. You can also use apt.
All in all, I didn't really like Scientific. There's nothing wrong with it, but it didn't "feel" right to me for some reason. I wouldn't recommend it, but I wouldn't not recommend it.
Can anybody help me?
I need to install Scientific Linux 4.3 - i386. I have download all CD images (from ftp://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/...c/43/iso/i386/) and burned them in the same way. However after checking CD-1 system sad that it was failed (all other CDs were Ok). When I tried to download and burn it ones more the same problem occured. It very interesting why after informing me about bad condition of this CD system can provide further pre-installing adjustments? I was afraid to began installing (it also Windows system on PC). Did anybody have such a problems?