Linux - DistributionsThis forum is for Distribution specific questions.
Red Hat, Slackware, Debian, Novell, LFS, Mandriva, Ubuntu, Fedora - the list goes on and on...
Note: An (*) indicates there is no official participation from that distribution here at LQ.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Ethernet (3Com, I believe) Megahertz PCMCIA 10 MBPs Network card
What I'm looking for is a fast, easy-to-use and very small install of Linux that will let me browse the internet (with decent graphics, so Lynx is out ), check e-mail, exchange IMs, and word process without being extraordinarily slow and (if at all possible) not eating up more than 50 MB of space.
I've used Linux in the past, but had bad experiences with it - I can get around and do some basic file work with competency. (LFS seems daunting, and I'm hoping I won't have to resort to that - I might just decide to leave Win95 on in that case.) I've tried installing muLinux, but it boots up EXTREMELY slowly, taking longer than Win95 - it takes several seconds to get through each disabled package. (This is running it from a restart-in-ms-dos-mode)
Currently I've got Win95 with MSOffice on the 'top, but have no way to back it up as the Microsoft Network won't work; FTP does, however, but the dos client won't auto-recurse into directories - a decent backup tool would be mucho appreciated as well.
mulinux uses a small c lib instead of glibc, the c lib it uses sacrifices speed if it gains less space, mainly only good for embedded devices that have small storage areas
i don't think you want to do LFS (compiling needs a lot of ram, and hard drive space for sources... yours just wont cut it.... play with a 486 it could take days to compile glibc (it takes my 586 laptop about half a day to compile glibc ... )
so get peanut or damnsmall linux, as installing from source codes on your machines just wont work that well (you can compile small packages, in a few minutes ... would take a new computer seconds) . but nothing big)
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.