Linux - DistributionsThis forum is for Distribution specific questions.
Red Hat, Slackware, Debian, Novell, LFS, Mandriva, Ubuntu, Fedora - the list goes on and on...
Note: An (*) indicates there is no official participation from that distribution here at LQ.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Hey all...I have worked with linux (redhat, ubuntu) and solaris for a long time. The company I work for is exploring the possibility of going to hp-ux (which I am not familiar with). Can anybody shed some light as to the pros/cons of linux vs hp-ux?
Distribution: CentOS, RHEL, Solaris 10, AIX, HP-UX
Posts: 731
Rep:
Hi,
I did some porting and benchmarking of mobile operator software in HP benchmark center in Grenoble, France 2005. It was very intersting to see that HP by itself only uses RHEL for the Itanium machines there. This told all i had to know about HPUX at this time.
The main differences are the same as between other Unixes, what means other hardware management tools, monolitic kernel without dynamic module support, mostly commercial compiler software for development, high stability, professional support options.
Some of this options are also available for linux, especially support. Missing the large community support is some cons for HPUX, otherwise commercial support contracts should also solve the problems coming up.
I prefer linux because of a wide range of software running easily on linux, but often only difficult or not on other Unixes.
I administer both OS' to be honest, our HP-UX machines are currently being thinned out. You're talking about a proprietary model vs an open more flexible model. Many different things come into play when making a decision like this - personally unless a particular software vendor made it mandatory to use HP-UX I'd go the Linux route. If you go with HP-UX you're stuck in a proprietary hardware and software model and it is NOT cheap.
If you absolutely need Enterprise-class support - you can look into Red Hat Enterprise Linux and SuSe Enterprise Linux. Take it from me, it would be an expensive sunken-cost to go the HP-UX route.
In HP-UX's defense, it is Unix and it runs well; although there are many caveats with running a proprietary Unix, specifically Support costs, Hardware costs and the license to run the OS.
Also keep in mind, if you must run a "true Unix" you can look into IBM's AIX operating system ( not cheap either ) or FreeBSD.
Last edited by misconfiguration; 01-03-2011 at 12:28 PM.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.