Linux - Distributions This forum is for Distribution specific questions.
Red Hat, Slackware, Debian, Novell, LFS, Mandriva, Ubuntu, Fedora - the list goes on and on... |
| Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
 |
GNU/Linux Basic Guide
This 255-page guide will provide you with the keys to understand the philosophy of free software, teach you how to use and handle it, and give you the tools required to move easily in the world of GNU/Linux. Many users and administrators will be taking their first steps with this GNU/Linux Basic guide and it will show you how to approach and solve the problems you encounter.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free. |
|
 |
|
05-14-2011, 03:03 PM
|
#1
|
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: May 2010
Location: Kerala,India
Distribution: Ubuntu 8.04,lubuntu 11.04,xubuntu 10.10
Posts: 11
Rep:
|
Linux for old laptop
Hi I am a newbie to linux.I had used Ubuntu,xubuntu and lubuntu before.I have an old laptop
hp pavilion zv5000
amd 64 processor
2.19Ghz,512 MB of RAM
GeForce4 440 go 64MB video card
I want to know which linux should i use to get most performance from my lap.I prefer kde desktop.As i said,i had already used different versions of ubuntu before.It wast fast at the beggining but later went slow.so i dont need to use any derivation of ubuntu again.
thank you
|
|
|
|
05-14-2011, 03:17 PM
|
#2
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Nov 2007
Location: Somewhere on my hard drive...
Distribution: Arch
Posts: 2,080
|
Anything "lite" will do. Ever considered Puppy? Or Macpup? Xubuntu, always a winner. What will the tasks be for the "old gal"?
I just installed Macpup on a P2/128Mb/2Gb - works ... nice, albeit somewhat slower than what I'm used to...but, it works.
Luck!
Thor
|
|
|
|
05-14-2011, 03:19 PM
|
#3
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Dec 2010
Location: Internet
Distribution: Linux Mint, Ubuntu, SLES, CentOS
Posts: 1,674
|
@ Reply
Hi there,
With the specs that you gave and the OS requirement that you are looking for I guess Gentoo will work for you.
You can download Gentoo from:
http://iso.linuxquestions.org/gentoo/
|
|
|
|
05-15-2011, 03:47 AM
|
#4
|
|
Member
Registered: Apr 2008
Location: UK
Distribution: Mepis; Maemo; openSUSE
Posts: 384
Rep:
|
With those specs I'd have though Mepis 11 would run fine! That fills your KDE criteria.
|
|
|
|
05-15-2011, 04:03 AM
|
#5
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Mar 2011
Location: Brisneyland
Distribution: Debian, aptosid
Posts: 2,955
|
Current ubuntu versions (11.04) will not be able to use the closed drivers with the GF4 card. (96.XX drivers are currently broken, and might remain like that for some time). So even if you didnt have the slowdown problem with ubuntu, its not really an option.
You could run a 'light' distro, but its not going to help that much with decent hardware. While it might not be that new, I would count (probably) AMD64 3400+, 512MB, GF4MX as decent...
I'd go for one of the minimal version of one of the majors distros (debian, arch or slackware in particular).
Quote:
Originally Posted by rich_c
With those specs I'd have though Mepis 11 would run fine! That fills your KDE criteria.
|
Mepis 11 uses KDE 4.X, and IMO KDE 4.X doesnt run that well with GF4 cards.
If you really have to use KDE, then KDE 3.X (trinty) its probably far more usable than KDE 4.X with the old GF4MX card.
Last edited by cascade9; 05-15-2011 at 04:05 AM.
|
|
|
|
05-15-2011, 11:36 AM
|
#6
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Jul 2006
Location: London
Distribution: CentOS, Salix
Posts: 2,288
|
If Cascade is right about KDE 4 not doing well with your video card, have a look at
http://vectorlinux.com/news/vector-l....0-kde-classic
It calls itself "a robust system with KDE 3.5.10 at the helm".
|
|
|
|
05-18-2011, 01:07 PM
|
#7
|
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: May 2010
Location: Kerala,India
Distribution: Ubuntu 8.04,lubuntu 11.04,xubuntu 10.10
Posts: 11
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by rich_c
With those specs I'd have though Mepis 11 would run fine! That fills your KDE criteria.
|
Mepis is good.Its the only distro which had drivers for all my hardwares after the fresh install.But my lap is not able to run it.It is running very slow and got stuck at times.So i dont need it anymore. 
|
|
|
|
05-18-2011, 01:09 PM
|
#8
|
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: May 2010
Location: Kerala,India
Distribution: Ubuntu 8.04,lubuntu 11.04,xubuntu 10.10
Posts: 11
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by T3RM1NVT0R
Hi there,
With the specs that you gave and the OS requirement that you are looking for I guess Gentoo will work for you.
You can download Gentoo from:
http://iso.linuxquestions.org/gentoo/
|
I think it will be the best distro for my laptop.But as i said am just beginner,but i tried installing it and failed.It took 2 days for me to install it.And I am not in a mood to try it again. 
|
|
|
|
05-18-2011, 01:13 PM
|
#9
|
|
LQ 5k Club
Registered: Sep 2009
Distribution: Arch x86_64
Posts: 6,443
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by adil91
I think it will be the best distro for my laptop.But as i said am just beginner,but i tried installing it and failed.It took 2 days for me to install it.And I am not in a mood to try it again. 
|
You can try Arch. It's still a lightweight, "advanced" distro, but it has a dependency-handling binary pakcage manager and is simpler to install.
|
|
|
|
05-18-2011, 01:14 PM
|
#10
|
|
Moderator
Registered: Dec 2009
Location: Hanover, Germany
Distribution: Slackware, Debian
Posts: 12,525
|
If you are already familiar with Ubuntu, but don't want a derivation of that again I would recommend to try Debian, it should be good with the standard install on that machine, if that is to slow you can try the XFCE-version.
|
|
|
|
05-18-2011, 01:20 PM
|
#11
|
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: May 2010
Location: Kerala,India
Distribution: Ubuntu 8.04,lubuntu 11.04,xubuntu 10.10
Posts: 11
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thor_2.0
Anything "lite" will do. Ever considered Puppy? Or Macpup? Xubuntu, always a winner. What will the tasks be for the "old gal"?
I just installed Macpup on a P2/128Mb/2Gb - works ... nice, albeit somewhat slower than what I'm used to...but, it works.
Luck!
Thor
|
The tasks for the old gal is not so much.She want to do these at a time,music player+empathy+a p2p software(qbittorrent preferred)+a browser+doc viewer/image viewer+vlc. And she should not be slow in these.
and i prefer KDE because i liked its looks.
|
|
|
|
05-18-2011, 01:37 PM
|
#12
|
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: May 2010
Location: Kerala,India
Distribution: Ubuntu 8.04,lubuntu 11.04,xubuntu 10.10
Posts: 11
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTK358
You can try Arch. It's still a lightweight, "advanced" distro, but it has a dependency-handling binary pakcage manager and is simpler to install.
|
Will I be able to use KDE with my h/w spec??
Last edited by adil91; 05-18-2011 at 01:40 PM.
|
|
|
|
05-18-2011, 02:38 PM
|
#13
|
|
Moderator
Registered: Dec 2009
Location: Hanover, Germany
Distribution: Slackware, Debian
Posts: 12,525
|
If you can use KDE is not dependent on the distro, but on KDE itself. You will not get sufficient speed in KDE with any distro, it is KDE that is the resource hog.
|
|
|
|
05-18-2011, 02:44 PM
|
#14
|
|
Member
Registered: Jan 2010
Location: Inland PNW
Distribution: VLocity | antiX-13
Posts: 234
Rep:
|
http://ftp.cc.uoc.gr/mirrors/linux/m...eleased/antix/
Try antiX-M8.5-686.iso
as a suggestion. Great support, too!
Sorry, no KDE will work satisfactorily, but you may like IceWM -- give it a try, is all I can say.
Best wishes!
Last edited by hilyard; 05-18-2011 at 02:47 PM.
Reason: add info
|
|
|
|
05-18-2011, 08:05 PM
|
#15
|
|
Member
Registered: Apr 2011
Distribution: Linux Mint, antiX, crunchbang
Posts: 33
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by hilyard
|
The newest release, M11, is a bit better than M8.5, all in good ways. I had a few issues with antiX the first time I tried it (8.5) but am sucessfully running and loving M11 on my laptop as we speak.
|
|
|
1 members found this post helpful.
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:10 AM.
|
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|