Linux - Distributions This forum is for Distribution specific questions.
Red Hat, Slackware, Debian, Novell, LFS, Mandriva, Ubuntu, Fedora - the list goes on and on... |
| Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
 |
GNU/Linux Basic Guide
This 255-page guide will provide you with the keys to understand the philosophy of free software, teach you how to use and handle it, and give you the tools required to move easily in the world of GNU/Linux. Many users and administrators will be taking their first steps with this GNU/Linux Basic guide and it will show you how to approach and solve the problems you encounter.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free. |
|
 |
11-01-2001, 11:22 AM
|
#1
|
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Aug 2001
Posts: 6
Rep:
|
Installing distros over distros
I am running SuSE 7.3 but ave now decided that it would be better to stick with Caledera. Is it possible to just install Caldera over it without reforrmatinfg my linux partition?
Thanks,
Sunil

|
|
|
|
11-01-2001, 01:06 PM
|
#2
|
|
Guru
Registered: Jan 2001
Posts: 24,128
Rep: 
|
well, you can start the install, but its best to reformat so no problems arise.. though if you wanted you don't have to reformat the /home directory, but might not overwrite the existing files if you wanted it to or not.
best recommendation though, reformat the partitions, saves you any troubles that might arise.. and it shouldn't take that long during the install process to reformat.
|
|
|
|
11-02-2001, 01:51 AM
|
#3
|
|
Member
Registered: Jun 2001
Location: 28N,82W
Distribution: XP,Ubuntu 9
Posts: 468
Rep:
|
You can have both
Sunil,
It's very much possible to have both. All you need is another small partition. You can share the swap between diff distros.
Think about it.
I have SuSE, Redhat, on one machine. I plan to put caldera, mandrake along with others... It's fun.
Ravi
|
|
|
|
11-02-2001, 05:17 AM
|
#4
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Apr 2001
Location: Cornwall, England.
Distribution: Debian + Ubuntu
Posts: 4,345
Rep:
|
If you've got several different distros, would you have to copy the kernels from each distro onto one partition for LiLo to see them, or can she see kernels on any partition? I know this is fairly basic question, but:
1) I recently tried to install Debian Progeny, and was unsure if the 'new' LiLo (the Progeny installed one) would automatically see the Mandy distro and give an option to boot that (it turns out that it wouldn't install properly anyway, must burn new CD).
2) I am thinking of putting RH7.2 (when I've downloaded it) alongside my M8.1.
|
|
|
|
11-02-2001, 04:21 PM
|
#5
|
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Aug 2001
Posts: 6
Original Poster
Rep:
|
What I meant was, getting rid of SuSE and only havig Mandrake. I just wanted to know if I had to rformat or not.
Thanks,
Sunil

|
|
|
|
11-04-2001, 07:49 PM
|
#6
|
|
Guru
Registered: Jan 2001
Posts: 24,128
Rep: 
|
and to clarify my first post, everyone seems to get off topic at times, yes, i would recommend to reformat your drive.
|
|
|
|
11-05-2001, 08:06 AM
|
#7
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Apr 2001
Location: Cornwall, England.
Distribution: Debian + Ubuntu
Posts: 4,345
Rep:
|
Sorry sunilk, saw concorans reply and I sort-of hijacked this thread.
Anyway, since I'm here:
I know that Linux wants its bootable bit (not sure, is this just bootable partition or the kernel image itself?) to be somewhere under the 8Gb marker. If this is the kernel image, could I, for instance:
Install Debian (I'm still trying) onto the last partition on my HD (it starts at something like 30Gb marker, and then to the end, which is 40.1Gb). Boot Mandrake, copy the debian kernel image from /dev/hda14 to the /boot dir on Mandy's system (which is comforatably in the 4Gb marker range), edit my lilo and be able to boot Debian (even though the rest of the Debian system still resides at 30Gb+)?
Sorry for the possibly weird approach to this - I've just had a silly length genetics seminar, which seemed to focus on markers for this, markers for that, and markers for the other, hence I've got markers peppered all through this entry.
|
|
|
|
11-05-2001, 11:22 AM
|
#8
|
|
Moderator
Registered: Jun 2001
Location: UK
Distribution: Gentoo, RHEL, Fedora, Centos
Posts: 42,676
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Thymox
I know that Linux wants its bootable bit (not sure, is this just bootable partition or the kernel image itself?) to be somewhere under the 8Gb marker.
|
well, only with lilo < 21.7, 21.7 is only on rh72 and md80 to my knowledge, nothign stopping you upgrading of course.
|
|
|
|
11-07-2001, 02:14 AM
|
#9
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Sep 2001
Location: Brisvegas, Antipodes
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 4,590
Rep:
|
Slack8 has a 'good' version of lilo. As for the original question, format and install mandrake.
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:44 AM.
|
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|