Linux - DistributionsThis forum is for Distribution specific questions.
Red Hat, Slackware, Debian, Novell, LFS, Mandriva, Ubuntu, Fedora - the list goes on and on...
Note: An (*) indicates there is no official participation from that distribution here at LQ.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
right now im using suse linux 8.2 pro. it's set as master on the ide cable, and its on the first ide channel. i would like to have my cd drive as slave on this channel.
i have a win2kpro drive that i want to hook up as master on the second ide channel, and my cd-rw drive will be slave.
Have you tried using Grub? It installs by default with SuSE 8.2 Personal... I dual-boot that and XP Pro just fine, but I don't have each OS on a different physical drive.
Linux bootloaders are better able to configure existing OS's when they find them than Windows ones are - infact Windows ones are relatively mediocre in this respect.
It doesn't matter if you are using Pro or Personal, both use Grub and boot the same way. If you install SuSE AFTER you install Windows, then Grub will install and you can use that. If you install SuSE BEFORE Windows, then Windows will overwrite the MBR and prevent you from booting a non-Windows OS.
Originally posted by sorrodos It doesn't matter if you are using Pro or Personal, both use Grub and boot the same way. If you install SuSE AFTER you install Windows, then Grub will install and you can use that. If you install SuSE BEFORE Windows, then Windows will overwrite the MBR and prevent you from booting a non-Windows OS.
alright, that makes sence, but it didnt overwrite the mbr. it just installed windows normally and didnt affect windows at all. i just dont want to have to go into bios every time and tell my computer to read hd-0 or hd-1 first.
i didnt install anything "first" they are two different hard drives, one has linux, one has windows. both can boot fine when they boot separately, and are put on the first ide channel.
Okay, try this. Reinstall SuSE again now, when it comes to the bootloader configuration, tell it to install it to the MBR of hda.
It sounds to me that what the issue is here is that it sounds like you installed Grub or Lilo to the MBR of your Linux partition and Win2000 installed its bootloader to the MBR of its drive. You need to install Grub to the same MBR where Win2000 installs its bootloader. Grub will then give you a choice to boot either Linux or Windows.
you can even have up to 8 systems i think on the same psychical drive
and have multiboot,... you dont even have to use seperate drives,... and every linux distrib (almost any) has a boot manager (lilo & grub &...)
I don't understand. I have /dev/hda1 (Win2K), /dev/hda5 (Debian, sort of), and /dev/hdb1 (Slack). Win2K came with the thing, I added the second hard drive and put Slack on and installed LILO in the hda mbr. Then I installed Mandrake briefly, resized the Win2K partitions, decided I didn't like Mandrake, and installed Debian. The Debian install got fubared, but it boots.
I dunno why you're so picky but you want /dev/hda to be SuSe and /dev/hdc to be a hard drive with Win2K? So use fdisk to set /dev/hda as bootable, install LILO to the mbr, and set lilo.conf to boot SuSe and Win2K. If Win2K doesn't like that, try setting hdc as bootable and install LILO to *that* mbr, maybe. If Win2K *still* doesn't like it, why not have a normal set up with Win2K on hda and SuSe on hdb? Have LILO on hda mbr and it'll work like a charm.
The fact that it's two different drives doesn't matter - it's still one boot loader controlling the two systems.
Please understand that I have no idea really, because I've never had such an arrangement but, if I was going for it, that's what I'd try. I *do* boot two OSes from two different drives, though, like I say.
Thats exactly what we've been saying all along. It doesn't make a difference if you have a different OS on each drive. Install grub or lilo to the MBR of hda1, set hda1 as the bootable, and you'll be able to choose to boot Windows or Linux on startup. We've been saying that all along because it will work.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.