Linux - DistributionsThis forum is for Distribution specific questions.
Red Hat, Slackware, Debian, Novell, LFS, Mandriva, Ubuntu, Fedora - the list goes on and on...
Note: An (*) indicates there is no official participation from that distribution here at LQ.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I'm considering using this OS as a server. I run a simple webserver from home for my website (www.compiledmonkey.com) and a few others. I'd probably try out the desktop features just for kicks. Have any of you guys tried this yet? How do you like it?
AMD, Lycoris as a server? Why not do a Grand Prix in a Mini Cooper? They're both daft ideas! Lycoris is, IMO, OK for a desktop setup where the user wants to be in Windows, but not running Windows, if you see what I mean. Of course you can use Lycoris as a server OS, but IIWY I would stick with more mainstream Linux distros, like RedHat, for your servers, and play with Lycoris (if you want) on the desktop, and never the twain shall mix.
No, that was my point. RH is a fine desktop, and Lycoris is, for some, a fine desktop, but I wouldn't want to run Lycoris as a server. Grantedly the last time I actually used Lycoris was quite a while ago, but I can't see that they would have changed their ethos too much... and I just didn't feel comfortable using something that tried to limit my control over the system.
Hey - no flame here...experimentation is one of the hallmarks of the Linux OS. Lycoris is designed for the newbie who wants a turn key desktop distro. This means minimal tweaking and more like MS. Not good or bad, just the way it is, a different market niche. For server work I think you will find one of the others (RH, Suse, Mandrake) more desirable because of their level of control and the fact that they (the distros) have more of an interface that allows you to do more with set-up etc. Each distro has its pros and cons. Kind of like tools...not bad, you just gotta find the right tool for the right job.
You want me to do what...?
And pull out the what-what...?
Hey guys, I respect the opinions. I think I'll stick with RH7.1 for now. I was considering upgrading the box to RH8 but don't see a huge need for it. The drive probably couldn't take it anyways. I wish I had a nice computer at home I could dedicate to Linux. I just picked up a second PC at work and installed RH8. I'm going to try and use that box more and more.
What do you mean a 'nice computer' I've got Linux running solely on a P-90 and on a PII-350. I still dual boot on my Athlon-1.4 due to the need to use a scanner (and to waste time playing games).
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.