Linux - DesktopThis forum is for the discussion of all Linux Software used in a desktop context.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Distribution: Servers: Scientific Linux 5.x // Desktops: Fedora Core (latest)
Posts: 110
Rep:
Quote:
Originally Posted by zetabill
What is really all that different about the Chinese versions? (Specifically, I mean)
I looked over the differences and it just seems like that "Chinese" version is simply the windows version of the mplayer codecs. Both versions have a few files that the other doesn't have but most of them are the same.
You are correct - they are 'basically' the same... but not.
I do not know the little bits and pieces of 'why' the following is true, but it is: Certain laws in the United States and elsewhere prevent copyrighted (trade secret, proprietary) codecs (which, in this case, are created by the Windows developers) to be distributed legally. These laws or regulations are apparently not enforced in China.
Therefore, by downloading from a Chinese server, we are able to get the 'real' codecs.
The similar codecs available on the United States servers are open source codecs that try to do the same job as the actual 'real' Windows codecs. They do a good job, but sometimes they don't work for everything.
That is all the information that I have on the subject... after getting the "Chinese" codecs to work, I stopped researching the topic because it worked, so I didn't need any more information.
------------
Regarding Fedora Core 6...
I myself have actually just upgraded my workstation to FC6 -- my server, home theatre PC, and other machines still use FC5. I have, however, not worked with Mandrake, Suse, or any other distributions. I have only dealt with Red Had 7, Red Hat 9, Fedora Core 5 and 6.
My reasons for choosing Red Hat / FC is (in my opinion) ease of use and familiarity of gnome --- gnome under FC looks a lot like Windows.
I am sorry, but that is all that I can really tell you on the topic... Red Hat / FC worked for me, so I pretty much stopped looking for distrutions after that... its the whole "If it's not broke, don't fix it" mentality.
These laws or regulations are apparently not enforced in China.
Since I live in the People's Republic of China, may I reply?
In China, copyright means 'the right to copy'. There is little respect
for the rights or properties of others. In the city where we live, you
can purchase *any* software (copy CD) for 3 RMB.
I myself have actually just upgraded my workstation to FC6 -- my server, home theatre PC, and other machines still use FC5. I have, however, not worked with Mandrake, Suse, or any other distributions. I have only dealt with Red Had 7, Red Hat 9, Fedora Core 5 and 6.
My reasons for choosing Red Hat / FC is (in my opinion) ease of use and familiarity of gnome --- gnome under FC looks a lot like Windows.
I am sorry, but that is all that I can really tell you on the topic... Red Hat / FC worked for me, so I pretty much stopped looking for distrutions after that... its the whole "If it's not broke, don't fix it" mentality.
Sorry but I only like Kde as I have tried both but my liking went on to KDE and What I read at wikipedia and as per ur reply is Fedora Core is Gnome and none of the Linux Distro works for me fully (presently Installed Open Suse 10.1 but no GUI or Display, I think my monitor is not supporting 1024*768 or something and it is trying for the same sd no display, can u tell me how to convert it to 800*600) so Im trying various distros But liked Mandriva 2007 as it is KDE and I have ubuntu (But unable to enable KDE) where as Kubuntu has KDE by default(What I have heard) but I don't have kubuntu. So it is still in trial and error. What I felt is Linux still needs some time (2yrs) to penetrate in a desktop os market (PC OS)for a common user. U all may not agree with my Thinking.
Distribution: Servers: Scientific Linux 5.x // Desktops: Fedora Core (latest)
Posts: 110
Rep:
Param,
Fedora can use either Gnome or KDE (or even both, with a tool that allows you to switch between the two). This choice can be made during installation.
As far as how to change resolution... I only know how to do that from within the gui... which I don't suppose you'd be able to do if you can't get the gui to load.
Fedora can use either Gnome or KDE (or even both, with a tool that allows you to switch between the two). This choice can be made during installation.
As far as how to change resolution... I only know how to do that from within the gui... which I don't suppose you'd be able to do if you can't get the gui to load.
Thank U as I was not knowing that u can select the option while installation itself. if it so then I'll definately give it a try. Another thing with FC is it does not detect my all other OSes, although it gives the option to add them. Anyhow I'll definately give a try to FC.
Sorry but I only like Kde as I have tried both but my liking went on to KDE and What I read at wikipedia and as per ur reply is Fedora Core is Gnome and none of the Linux Distro works for me fully (presently Installed Open Suse 10.1 but no GUI or Display, I think my monitor is not supporting 1024*768 or something and it is trying for the same sd no display, can u tell me how to convert it to 800*600) so Im trying various distros But liked Mandriva 2007 as it is KDE and I have ubuntu (But unable to enable KDE) where as Kubuntu has KDE by default(What I have heard) but I don't have kubuntu. So it is still in trial and error. What I felt is Linux still needs some time (2yrs) to penetrate in a desktop os market (PC OS)for a common user. U all may not agree with my Thinking.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.