Advise request, what "MS Office" suites do you use?
Linux - DesktopThis forum is for the discussion of all Linux Software used in a desktop context.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I use them all BUT MSbs. My Sparky is OpenOffice 4.17. Free Office is on AntiX Alpha1,OpenOffice latest is on Parrot Mate rolling and MX19.3 both Xfce and Kde...Oh.
My LMDE4 runs OO also but a lil older(debian stable-stable)
Ironically my fave is Open Office...just because I've run it since 1997. It themed up pretty too using Sparky 6 LXQt/Openbox.
Strange enough, this has never been an argument for me.
Quick startup, simple access to functionality, the flexibility and the means to intervene wherever I want, are more important. For the interoperability between people, using a diversity of different programs, there is absolutely no solution. You have to try, hope and adapt.
Abiword for text-processing allows me a maximum of automation without the need for integrated scripting
Gnumeric is faster than SoftMaker PlanMaker which is faster than anything else I have ever touched.
Presentations - You make me turn and run, quick and far, by asking me to prepare one. I can give you PDFs, write on flipcharts and whiteboards. HTML... do not underestimate that one.
Graphics ? This is Linux. No Office-Suite necessary.
Last edited by Michael Uplawski; 04-05-2021 at 07:58 AM.
Reason: Kraut2English
Distribution: Linux Mint 20.1, Ubuntu Studio and Storm
Posts: 13
Rep:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael Uplawski
Strange enough, this has never been an argument for me.
Quick startup, simple access to functionality, the flexibility and the means to intervene wherever I want, are more important. For the interoperability between people, using a diversity of different programs, there is absolutely no solution. You have to try, hope and adapt.
Abiword for text-processing allows me a maximum of automation without the need for integrated scripting
Gnumeric is faster than SoftMaker PlanMaker which is faster than anything else I have ever touched.
Presentations - You make me turn and run, quick and far, by asking me to prepare one. I can give you PDFs, write on flipcharts and whiteboards. HTML... do not underestimate that one.
Graphics ? This is Linux. No Office-Suite necessary.
And if the CEO of a Company wants to install a Linux Based OS on all his workers Machines and no Office Suite is needed, it would be one screwed up Office.
And if the CEO of a Company wants to install a Linux Based OS on all his workers Machines and no Office Suite is needed, it would be one screwed up Office.
For a short while there was a version for Linux, but bent willyg took care of that by makng a $135 million (Canadian) "investment" in Corel and within weeks Corel Linux and WordPerfect Office for Linux disappeared without so much as a whisper.
Distribution: openSUSE, Raspbian, Slackware. Previous: MacOS, Red Hat, Coherent, Consensys SVR4.2, Tru64, Solaris
Posts: 2,810
Rep:
Quote:
Originally Posted by iTick
I am curious to know what you guys use for writing, spread sheets and maybe presentations on Linux.
I do have MS Office on my windows box but would like to have an alternative on my Debian box.
I do not plan on moving documents back and forth between windows and Linux. And if I do, I would not be worried about formatting.
Ages ago, I used Applixware. The version I was using apparently stopped being supported by newer versions of Java. (Write once run anywhere? Ha!)
LibreOffice for anything that I need to exchange with people chained to the MS treadmill. I sometimes get nervous about the ".docx" format but, to date, no interchange problems. I tend to save in ".doc" format as a lowest common denominator format. Though LO warns about possible formatting problems, I've tested enough documents using the missus's Word that I'm comfortable ignoring the warning. Spreadsheets are an area where interchange problems would be a bigger concern (macros, etc.) but, fortunately, I don't exchange spreadsheets terribly often---though there are people who use Excel for all their communications needs. (IMHO, there's a special circle of Hell reserved for the people who send out a spreadsheet because they have some tabular information to convey when a word processor document with a table would have been more appropriate. Multiple paragraphs of text in spreadsheet cells just because you had a 5x5 table of text/numbers to pass along? You gotta be kidding me.)
If I'm writing documentation, procedures, etc. I tend to use Emacs/LaTeX/make/Okular. I find references, footnotes, figures (mainly output from graphviz), and a host of other things far easier to deal with in LaTeX than in a word processor---especially if the document is large. I'll admit to be biased toward TeX/LaTeX from being a long-time VAX DOCUMENT user which used used TeX as a backend. I got used to writing to it directly using Knuth's and Lamport's books as my guide.
Distribution: openSUSE, Raspbian, Slackware. Previous: MacOS, Red Hat, Coherent, Consensys SVR4.2, Tru64, Solaris
Posts: 2,810
Rep:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael Uplawski
HTML... do not underestimate that one.
You could put together a presentation made of individual web pages. Host it on the company's internal web site and just page through it via a browser on your laptop while it's plugged into the projector. Though it's cheap -- no Powerpoint license required -- nobody would do that nowadays because it'd be too difficult, if not impossible, to animate the page text like PP can. (I think these are supposed to capture the viewer's interest. Call me a curmudgeon, but, for me, the animated titles and mainly serve to demonstrate how little work went into generating the information being presented and, frankly, are nap-inducing.)
Though it's cheap -- no Powerpoint license required -- nobody would do that nowadays because it'd be too difficult, if not impossible, to animate the page text like PP can.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.