LinuxQuestions.org
Visit Jeremy's Blog.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Non-*NIX Forums > General
User Name
Password
General This forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 01-22-2008, 05:31 PM   #16
weblog
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jan 2008
Posts: 2

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0

Quote:
Originally Posted by armanox View Post
OpenBSD is more secure for the default install, but, only because everything is turned off. Meaning, if the system can boot without it, forget it. Although...if memory serves, SSH is enabled by default, but, it is a secure protocol
yup, i absolutely agree with you, i prefer OpenBSD too and i don't care about the easy installation of windows and linux but i am using vista for daily use and for gaming

what i dislike OpenBSD is the hard customization, since a bunch feature are turn off by default.

anyway, i am not yet use Mac OS, but have a plan to installing it on my x86 machine

thanks to everyone for making comment.
 
Old 01-22-2008, 07:25 PM   #17
PatrickNew
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Charleston, SC, USA
Distribution: Debian, Gentoo, Ubuntu, RHEL
Posts: 1,148
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 48
Quote:
Originally Posted by secretlydead View Post
The reason Vista (I'm guessing) was made was to get contracts from studio's to license their movies, etc, to be distributed over the Internet and still be secure.
And I think this is a crucial point not to be overlooked. In an open source operating system, security breaches are caused by mistakes which can be fixed. In a closed source OS, the breaches can be caused by mistakes or by malicious code within the OS. Now, we usually trust the providers of our OS's, but with WGA and all the drm in Vista, MS has made it clear that at least some of the spyware will be embeddedinto the OS. Therefore, I don't feel that its too extreme to say that vista cannot be secured and should *never* be used for sensitive information.
 
Old 01-22-2008, 08:52 PM   #18
choogendyk
Senior Member
 
Registered: Aug 2007
Location: Massachusetts, USA
Distribution: Solaris 9 & 10, Mac OS X, Ubuntu Server
Posts: 1,197

Rep: Reputation: 105Reputation: 105
Quote:
Originally Posted by secretlydead View Post
The reason Vista (I'm guessing) was made was to get contracts from studio's to license their movies, etc, to be distributed over the Internet and still be secure.
What? You think that's what's driving Vista? I mean, yeah, they put that in. But there's no way Microsoft's marketing interests are that limited. They are much bigger than movie distribution.

And, if you haven't been watching the news, Apple is now renting movies through iTunes and has contracts with all the major studies. Shares in Blockbuster and Netflix dropped a bunch the day that was announced.
 
Old 01-22-2008, 10:21 PM   #19
PatrickNew
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Charleston, SC, USA
Distribution: Debian, Gentoo, Ubuntu, RHEL
Posts: 1,148
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 48
Quote:
Originally Posted by choogendyk View Post
What? You think that's what's driving Vista? I mean, yeah, they put that in. But there's no way Microsoft's marketing interests are that limited.
I wouldn't say that DRM is the reason that vista was made, but it is a huge factor in the reason that vista was made the way it was. And ultimately, the reason for the DRM and spyware is far less important than the presence of the DRM and spyware.

And I'm not saying that Mac necessarily isn't doing the same thing, but at least they haven't got caught.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Remote Server Setup between Linux(Cent os (BSD)) & Sun Solaris vishalimpact Linux - Newbie 3 09-19-2007 02:55 AM
LXer: Defending Against New Rootkits That Beat BSD, Linux, Mac, Vista, AMD and Intel LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 08-09-2006 07:21 PM
I BSD is more secure them linux? maginotjr *BSD 8 08-04-2005 04:23 PM
Do you run *BSD & Mac OS X? carboncopy *BSD 4 12-12-2004 09:41 PM
BSD more secure than Linux? maxut Linux - Enterprise 1 09-09-2004 04:27 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Non-*NIX Forums > General

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:11 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration