GeneralThis forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Is it just me or does anyone else here notice that every so often, when an LQ page tries to load, it gets hung up waiting for the banner from burstnet.com to load. I hate to gripe about the people who are paying $$ to support this site, but could they please ditch their 56k modem and get a faster connection? I mean I wouldn't mind waiting for the banner itself to load up, but I can see the page load then it disappears when it tries to contact burstnet, leaving me sitting in front of a blank screen for an eternity. All of the other sponsors banners load just fine, just the burstnet ones take forever!
I have the same problem. I hate it. Sometimes the page times out waiting for the banners to finish, and I have to hit refresh.
I hate how banner ads and popups are getting more and more popular, because people have broadband. I don't pay broadband so I can see more ads.
Kinda sux.......but the info is worth it.
Hopefully I can invent a TIVO type device to browse all the pages you like to see and remove all ads and then you can just browse stuff how you like it. It would just browse forums and sites for you about 3 minutes ahead of time
Kind of strange that it happens to some people and not others. Maybe it's something with the routing to their servers. I've tried the refresh thing, but 90% of the time I still get a burstnet banner that doesn't load.
> Hopefully I can invent a TIVO type device to browse all the pages you like to see and remove all ads and then you can just browse stuff how you like it. It would just browse forums and sites for you about 3 minutes ahead of time
Sign me up! I'll be customer #1.
Last edited by Capt_Caveman; 04-19-2003 at 11:17 PM.
I completely understand the need to have banners. I just wasn't sure if it was just me or not. It seemed strange to have a page hang like that forever waiting for a banner to load. I haven't had a problem like that till just recently.
Distribution: Fedora, Debian, OpenSuSE and Android
Posts: 1,820
Rep:
And many of us dial-up users have no choice in the matter. I live in the second largest city in my state and have no other options to connect to the internet other than a <56k connection.
You know, if your smarter than the computer, there are ways around this so-called problem of loading burstnet ads...... but my mouth is kept shut though. Didn't hear it from me.
You could always become a contributing member, to have the ability to turn the ads off... Hmmm...
Distribution: Debian, Red Hat, Slackware, Fedora, Ubuntu
Posts: 13,602
Rep:
I try not to run many so called rich media ads as I think they are annoying. If you do see a problem with burst in the future please let me know ASAP and provide a traceroute to the ad server if possible. I will then open a ticket with burst. The fact that some people have a problem and some dont is likely related to the fact that IE users will get IFRAME ads so the page will never hang even if the ad server is completely down.
I'll let you know next time it happens again and I'll include the traceroute results as well. Thanks for responding and taking an interest. I think that's part of what makes LQ such a great site!
A better option might be Mozilla 1.3 : Preferences -> Privacy & Security -> Images, and select the 'Accept images that come from the originating server only' radio button.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.