LinuxQuestions.org
Share your knowledge at the LQ Wiki.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Non-*NIX Forums > General
User Name
Password
General This forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 07-10-2003, 10:05 PM   #1
Jella
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: TX, USA
Distribution: Red Hat 7.1
Posts: 3

Rep: Reputation: 0
Question The Switch: Share your experiences


When I say The Switch, I of course refer to quitting on Windows and switching over to Linux. I downloaded and installed Linux about 3 years ago, and gave up on it fairly soon because, for one, there seemed to be quite the shortage when it came to the kind of software I needed, and also I found it difficult to so much as install software. Even though I have experience in DOS and Pascal programming, it just felt like it was too much trouble to go through for very little gain.

This, back then, was Red Hat 7.1. I've been preparing to install 9.0 and give that a shot, and was hoping that people who have switched from Win to Linux might share their experiences.

I am hoping that Linux will perform better on my Dell than Windows. Even though my computer clocks at about 1.6 GHz and has almost 400 megs of RAM, it still seems like Windows is kind of....sluggish. XP doesn't perform even as well on this machine as 2000 performed on my old 600 MHz Compaq, OR even my even older 166 MHz clone. And that is saying something...
 
Old 07-10-2003, 10:35 PM   #2
jbeedham
Member
 
Registered: May 2003
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 57

Rep: Reputation: 15
I'm not here to dis linux but I think that linux in it's current form is a halfass attempt at an operating system. The way it's designed you have to do everything the hard way. I like things the nice easy gui way. In order for Linux to compete with other os's I think it needs prgrams that come with installers (like programs for other os's do). It needs a program to keep track of installed programs (like add/remove programs in windows) to make it easier to remove programs. A drag and drop gui would be nice. Linux, BeOS, and Windows have got it. Come on Linux!

Honestly, the only reason I have become interested in Linux is because it is free. I also think it makes a nice web server. It is on the path of getting there for other stuff but leaves something to be desired. When Linus Torvalds created the kernel he never thought it would come this far so Linux is kind of poorly designed os overall. It is a bunch of stiff that has been slapped together. Amazing collaboration on the part of individuals but still leaves a lot to be desired for a fully functional gui os.

I am looking forward to open be os. That will probably take care of a lot of stuff that linux has messed up on.
 
Old 07-11-2003, 12:01 AM   #3
BrutualTarget
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: Juneau, AK
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 14

Rep: Reputation: 0
I don't no anything about BeOS, so any comments made about anything in my post is made in ignorance of BeOS' abilities.

I'm under the impression that Linux gives up nice easy gui for more power, server and user-wise. Windows feels like a prison, but with Linux (which I've used for less than a day now) I'm free to make it my computer, as opposed to Bill Gates'.
 
Old 07-11-2003, 01:04 AM   #4
MasterC
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Mar 2002
Location: Salt Lake City, UT - USA
Distribution: Gentoo ; LFS ; Kubuntu ; CentOS ; Raspbian
Posts: 12,613

Rep: Reputation: 69
I'm going to move this to the General Forum as it really has no Linux Questions in it. Also, I'm going to add, please don't turn this into a "Linux vs Windoze" thread. It will cause un-necessary heartburn on anyone involved. If you would like to participate in such a discussion, there are 2 or 3 active ones in the Forum you will find this in ( http://www.linuxquestions.org/questi...?s=&forumid=10 )



Thanks!
 
Old 07-12-2003, 08:46 PM   #5
twilli227
Member
 
Registered: May 2003
Location: S.W. Ohio
Distribution: Ubuntu, OS X
Posts: 760

Rep: Reputation: 30
quote:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A drag and drop gui would be nice. Linux, BeOS, and Windows have got it. Come on Linux!
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
Old 07-13-2003, 04:45 AM   #6
finegan
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Aug 2001
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 5,700

Rep: Reputation: 72
To get this one back on track, since I liked the original topic.

I started with RH7.0, the buggiest release ever. Man, that was fun. I wanted to share the house DSL connection and this was back when a Blue Bomber from Linksys clocked in at around $200. That was about two and a half years ago, from there I built a new machine, dual-booted it, bought an old PPro and turned it into a server, dumped the old P 1 200 onto a shelf, got more random free hardware and made some SETI@home boxes... then there was the 9 laptops incident, the experiment with LFS that is chronicled here somewhere. Then there was the festival with the BSDs, the new house and the Sun Ultra and the 5 static IPs... somewhere in the middle of all that the last dual-boot I had around with win98 on a 2.8Gb drive went bye-bye when I needed the drive for something, I can't remember when, maybe a year and a half ago now? Why did I switch? I got sick of voodoo. One time I had Age of Empires crashing my "warrantied to hell and back" Gateway. I had no idea why, I called MS, they talked to me like I was 5. Finally I got a straight answer from Gateway about multiple versions of DirectX being installed, just remove everything, re-install, retry until it goes away. I did what they said and it worked, but there was no earthly reason as to why, and it might as well have been a rain dance, sacrificing a chicken. When I have a Linux box act funky I can usually research the problem, and find not just a solution, but a reason as to why it freaked out. That's why... control.

If you think the GUIs are trying now, you should compare it to the 1.2 series Gnome... or KDE in the early 2.x, although that was when I switched over to fluxbox... Stephenson said it best, In the Beginning Was the Command Line, and whenever my buddy the Mac junky mentions he can get the same thing done in five mouseclicks, I challenge him to a race where I can get it done in less time, and a half hundred keystrokes.

Oh, and the last of Be's IP was purchased by Palm back in what... 2000? And Palm has since done... nothing with it, might as well have chucked it in the San Francisco Bay. There was a movement to buy the codebase and open it, but I thought that had burned out around '01. Is there something I've missed?

Cheers,

Finegan
 
Old 07-13-2003, 02:15 PM   #7
Whitehat
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2003
Location: The Cold North
Distribution: SuSE 9.1
Posts: 1,289

Rep: Reputation: 46
Not fully switched yet.....cause Linux can't do everything I need it to do.

Like Play Counter-Strike (WITHOUT WINE).
 
Old 07-13-2003, 03:00 PM   #8
Locura
Member
 
Registered: May 2003
Distribution: Ubuntu 6.10 SE, Mac OS 10.4.8
Posts: 370

Rep: Reputation: 30
Quote:
Originally posted by jbeedham
When Linus Torvalds created the kernel he never thought it would come this far so Linux is kind of poorly designed os overall. It is a bunch of stiff that has been slapped together. Amazing collaboration on the part of individuals but still leaves a lot to be desired for a fully functional gui os.
It was not designed to be a GUI OS, it was designed to be a workalike of UNIX. If you don't like it, don't use it. It's just that simple. Of course you have to do more work run it, but the rewards are more than worth it.

I fully switched about a year ago, after dabbling in it several times in years past when I was a using Mandrake 7.x and 8.x. I think some of the more recent breakthroughs, especially in media applications such as mplayer, have really made it easier for the casual users to make the switch.
 
Old 07-13-2003, 04:53 PM   #9
SuseBoy
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: Between Florida and San Juan (PR)
Distribution: Suse 8.2/Fedora 5
Posts: 93

Rep: Reputation: 15
Well I have always been a Windass User since I was like 6.
Cept' at school in the early days we used linux, then the old macs which to me displayed graphics better than windows even as a child.
now I use suSE 8.2, it's not really buggys,
and Even though I have to CD and tar my files in terminal
it helps me learn programming, I can use XKILL (which is better than CTRL ALT DEL) and well, Think of how happy you are when you install your first program by way or Konsole or Terminal !


Windows, Always gave me the Blue-screen.
it took my dad kicking me off his XP computer upstairs
for me to Make this old P2 into a SuSE 8.2 with
9 GB of Free Space left now !,
Im totally linux.
my dad doesn't have 9 GB on his upstaird left !
I figure I will use 5 GB of space for P2P/ Filestoring

Im using openoffice to write my novel,(it's a dream)
suSE Supports the fact that I like to write in my other native tounges Korean and spanish also !

and so Well, this Thirtteen year old is pretty damn happy with
linux, and I've been using it a week now .!
After running some commands, I got my boot problem fixed.
so it goes to KDE for sure.
GAIM is a dream
Limewire is Kinda of slow, so im uninstalling it
but GTK-gnutella looks good, so does Xmule.

and when school start's back, Im glad im not taking computers
as an elective cuss WINDASS SUCKS !!!!!!!!!
everything in Windass I can do in linux
via Regular or WINE !
I can make GIMP work like my adobe photoshop.
Kwrite is better than notebook
Kinternet is better than What WIN 98 - NT had !
word == OpenOffice is Better, and I can help write it !

Webhosting. well Im using HOSTRADIUS and they use "gasp" linux also !

and I have a great desktop[ pic [
 
Old 07-13-2003, 04:57 PM   #10
Jose Muņiz
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: Mexico City
Distribution: Slackware 9.1, SuSE 9.1
Posts: 248

Rep: Reputation: 32
I've deleted my Windows Partition in this machine (my laptop). I only use Linux here (great).

But my laptop... as soon as I figure out how to configure my scanner and some other hardware I will completely switch to Linux everywhere... maybe with Wine in only one of the computers in case I really need some software not available for Linux (for homeworks, etc. )
 
Old 07-13-2003, 08:04 PM   #11
Franklin
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2002
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 1,348

Rep: Reputation: 217Reputation: 217Reputation: 217
Saturday, July 5th, 2003

No more dual-boot on my desktop. I still have 98SE on my old IBM 380XD (P233) because I still need to use Windows at work and all 3 linux distros I tried on it were just a little too pokey. I have samba at home and dhcp set up and I'm sharing a dial-up. Works for me.

The final straw was when my daughter asked me to look at her laptop because it wasn't working right. (XP Home). She had almost 2 gigs of MP3s, less than 10% disk space free, 34% fragmentation with over 50% of her files fragmented, and XP wouldn't defrag cuz there wasn't enough free disc space. I asked her when the last time she did scandisk or defraged - blank stare (just like her mother - poor kid)

OK never mind. So I get her hooked up to my computer to transfer some files thinking I'd free some disk space and burn them to CD for her so she can reload 'em later after I defrag. Of course XP wouldn't talk to samba (always when your in a hurry) so I boot into 98 on my box and network that way. I transfer the files and, since I'm in windows already I figure I'll just use windows to burn the CD's (roxio) .... 3 coasters later I say screw this and boot to linux, load K3B and wam, bam, thank-you-mam we're all set.

So that gets me thinkin' "what am I really keeping windows on this box for anyway" so off it comes. 40 gigs all for SuSE (and a 10 gig partition for another distro cuz - ya can't eat just one )

I don't really miss anything per se. I know that there is nothing like PageMaker in linux - but, truthfully I haven't been using it that much lately. I didn't like the GIMP at first, but I'm getting used to it now. I found some great stuff for turning my old tapes to MP3 and Oggs and cleaning them up. Just need the time to do it more.

I think the key is just forcing yourself to use linux and then you find the tools you need. Ya, I won't find everything, but Windows wasn't 100% perfect either.

One last point. While neither linux nor windows is perfect, I have to to say that when ever I'm in windows, something always happens that makes me miss or appreciate linux. When I'm in linux, there's nothing that makes me miss windows.
 
Old 07-13-2003, 11:15 PM   #12
2damncommon
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2003
Location: Calif, USA
Distribution: PCLINUXOS
Posts: 2,918

Rep: Reputation: 103Reputation: 103
I started with Mandrake 6.5, Linux for Windows (install Linux to your Windows partition with no repartitioning needed). It did not like my video chipset (i810) so I had a desktop that was 4 times the size of the screen and everything looked like a badly printed cartoon. Spent hours trying to correct that before I discovered I had a chipset and Linux didn't like it. Fooled with this a few months.
Then I heard Suse 6.4 supported the i810 out of the box. That was my first real look at Linux running correctly. Being a noob, I installed "everything". Suse happily loaded over 5 GB of stuff and I poked around it. Winmodem wouldn't work and onboard sound wouldn't work. Ran this a while.
At some point I was given an external modem and got Linux online in minutes.
I moved along to Mandrake 7.1. Did the basic Linux From Scratch build with this Mandrake version. Finally got a Soundblaster sound card and had sound in Linux.
Then on to Mandrake 8.0. Not real sure how long I ran the previous versions, but I ran this one over a year.
I had fooled with Progeny and was impressed. I thought I would try the real thing (Debian Potato) for a console only project on an old PC. Woody came out a few months later and I got it.
I had also fooled with Slack for a while. Installed 7.1, Zipslack to an old PC. Turned out the problem I had getting Slack online was changing the modem string. Have Slack 9.0 onboard nowadays. It's really sort of a backup still.
And the sad end to the tale is that I have not left Windows behind. It still has a little piece of the pie on the first primary "in case there is something I need Windows for". And I use it at work daily.
I do hand out Knoppix disks for penance.
 
Old 07-14-2003, 03:39 AM   #13
bulliver
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2002
Location: Edmonton AB, Canada
Distribution: Gentoo x86_64; Gentoo PPC; FreeBSD; OS X 10.9.4
Posts: 3,760
Blog Entries: 4

Rep: Reputation: 78
This is a cool thread, I like the idea of migration stories, positive ones.... . I dug this thread up from www.desktoplinux.com , where I posted it on Jul 01, 2002 16:54:35 , when I had been using linux for a week or so....

I've learned so much since.

------------------------------

Hello. My name is Darren, and I just recently migrated from windows to linux. I wish to relate my story, that it may help those who are planning the move themselves. All of us newbies know that the documentation assumes a certain degree of previous know-how, and we all know we don't have it. Of course we have some understanding of what we're getting ourselves in for, and that the "linux philosophy" includes trying to figure out problems yourself, but it can get really frustrating when you have to read a how-to, just to understand the concepts presented in the how-to of what you are really trying to figure out. Welcome to linux.

Anyway, frustrations aside, here's a narrative describing my migration, with all the highs and lows intact. Read it to know what you're in for. I will spill a few secrets that aren't in the documentation. Else, just read it to share a humorous account of one man's journey to save his soul.

I wanted to try Linux for both philosophical and practical reasons. I was sick of windows crashing on me three times a day. I was sick of "illegal operations". I was sick of giving Bill my money, and not really having a choice because he pays off computer manufacturers to pre-load his software. Have you noticed that it is nearly impossible to buy a computer from a retailer or online without windows on it? I don't like people telling me what I have to use, and that's the main philosophical reason for using linux instead.

My practical reasons are that I am a web developer. I create websites that use php and Mysql, and so for local development I needed to install Apache. Apache, and open-source software in general, is usually developed for linux. Sure, there are windows ports and whatnot, but you'll find that the documentation favors linux installations. In the future I want to set up my own web server, so I figured I had better learn how to use linux. Whatever your reasons for wanting to try linux, after you've made the decision, your next step is to pick a distribution.

Choosing the distribution seems to be the most confusing task for a new linux convert. Scour the linux forums and you will find many questions about which distro is the best for newbies. Generally, the suggestions are Redhat and Mandrake. I decided to opt for Redhat. I visited all the distro websites, and found that Redhat had the best documentation. I suggest you do the same, that is, visit the websites, and pick a distro whose docs are easy to access and understand, as that is half the battle. Read the docs, and if you feel comfortable, it's time to get the installation media.

I have high-speed cable access to the internet, so I decided to download the disk images. I found a nice quiet mirror, and it took about three hours per disk. If you don't have a fast internet connection you may want to buy the box set. The main benefit of doing this is that you will probably get telephone support, which may be invaluable in the months ahead. If you are strapped for cash, you may also be able to purchase "burned" copies of the disks for a considerable discount, of course you won't have the support. Another option is to join a linux users group in your area. Go to the meetings, make some friends, and maybe you can talk someone into lending, or burning you copies of the disks.

If you do decide to download as I did, you will need either two or three disk images depending on the distro. If your computer doesn't support booting from cdrom you may need to make a boot diskette using rawrite.exe, a program for DOS, that is usually contained in the dosutils folder of the FTP server that you get the disk images from. Note that almost every Intel-style computer built in the last five or so years is able to boot from a cdrom, however, you may have to enable this in your bios. One mistake that I made was burning the images as data. This will not work. The first time I tried to install I was told that the disk "did not appear to have the installation media" on it. It took me an hour of scouring documentation until I found my answer. If your burning software has a wizard, disable it. Look through the menus and find one that says "burn as image" or "burn ISO" or something to that effect. Burn your disks, and label them 1,2, and 3. If you need the boot diskette, make it. Now with these tools you are ready to install.

Here's something they don't tell you in the docs: go into your bios, and disable PnP (plug and play) devices. I neglected this, and when linux scanned my hardware it missed my ethernet card. Of course this meant I could not get online. Another afternoon of reading cryptic how-to's and I found that I needed to disable PnP devices. Of course it neglected to mention how, but since I had been snooping around in my bios settings recently I remembered an entry which allowed you to disable PnP devices. I rebooted linux, it found and configured my ethernet card, and I was good to go.

I'm getting ahead of myself though. I told you already about my first attempt to install, so after re-burning the images I attempted a second time. The Redhat install wizard fired up and I was on my way. It is very intuitive and easy to understand. After some initial questions about language and where the install media is (you did read the docs about linux drive naming conventions, didn't you?) it will ask you how you want to partition your drive. If you don't have a clue about partitioning you may want to use autopartition, which will set you up with some sensible defaults. I partitioned manually using disk druid, which was very intuitive. I should note here that I bought and installed a second hard drive just for linux, and if you choose to keep windows, this may be the easiest route to go. A note on that: even if you hate windows and never want to look at it again I recommend keeping it for now. Remember my trouble with the ethernet card? If I had wiped out windows I would not have been able to get back online to find the answers I needed.

So partitioning: The first partition I made was a 50MB boot partition, with the mount point of /boot. Next I made a swap partition of 256MB. They say your swap should be 2X your physical ram. I have since found that I don't use anywhere near 256MB of swap space (the most I have used at one time is 50MB) so if hard disk space is at a premium you can most likely get away with less. I have a brand new 40GB drive though, so I felt I had space to burn.

Next comes your root partition. I set this partition to use all available space, with the mount point of /. You need at least this partition or your install will not work. I also decided to make a partition and mount it as /home. The theory behind this is that if you need to reinstall or upgrade, and all your personal files are on the /home partition, they can be left untouched. Try doing that with windows. I also set this partition to use all available space, and the two partitions happily shared the bulk of the hard drive, with 18936MB each. Make sure you copy your partition table to paper before clicking "next", as you may need it. If you have two hard drives, make darn sure you're partitioning the right one.

Next you are asked to create the root password, and add users. Create a user for yourself at this time, as you may not be able to easily do it after your install, and you don't want to be tooling around your brand-new unfamiliar linux system as root.

Around this time it also asks if you want to use a boot loader. I went with LiLo, and at this point I want to have a little aside: Stipulate that I went through the rest of the install, made a boot diskette when prompted, and then rebooted. At this point during install attempt number two, disaster struck. LiLo did not work as it should. I am sure it was something I did wrong when configuring it, but the point is it didn't work. Neither OS would boot, all I got was a frozen black screen after running the bios. I tried rebooting again with the diskette. No dice. I was told that "boot media was corrupt". Bummer. I should mention here, that you should do yourself a favor and buy a new box of disks. I made a boot diskette on an old floppy, and even though I reformatted it, it was no good. I have since learned that boot images don't like occupying used floppies.

So I tried using my windows boot disk. It booted into DOS, and I had a prompt. I tried to cd to C:, but DOS told me it was an invalid drive name. Huh? After checking with fdisk (DOS not linux) I was told that drive C: was not a DOS drive. LiLo had written boot info to the first cylinder, and DOS could not see past it. I tried the old standby /MBR to restore the master boot record. No dice. I decided to reinstall windows from scratch. I had all my files backed up, but this was still a MAJOR inconvenience. Make sure your files are backed up, because this could happen to you. I have since learned that I could have saved my files anyway, because you are able to mount DOS partitions from linux. If you find yourself in this situation, try to get linux working, then you can recover the files from your windows partition.

So by now, I'm wondering if this is really worth all the hassle. Nothing was working for me, and I had to reinstall windows no less. Regardless, I decided to give it another shot. This time I decided to nix the boot loader, and just use a floppy to boot. Keeping in mind that it is now install attempt number three, I resume my narrative where I broke off.

Eventually you get to the point in the install wizard where you pick the packages you want to install. If you are from windows like me, the majority of these package names will be meaningless. When you choose your install type (workstation, server, notebook, or custom) it creates default package selections for you. Usually this will be fine. I have a big hard drive though, so I decided to install the works, and see what everything did. It clocked in at an hour and a half for a 3GB install. That's a lot of software.

Redhat then gives you a progress meter, and short descriptions of everything it installs. You also get some humorous ads/timewasters on the bottom of your screen, including a very funny take on the old "let's all go to the lobby" bit from the movie theaters. You also get three completely different explanations of how Redhat got it's name, and some shameless self-promotion. Go watch some TV or something if you want, allthough keep in mind it will eventually prompt you to put in the second and third CDs. After it is done you will be asked about your videocard and monitor, and then asked how you want to boot up: either KDE, Gnome, or plain text. I chose KDE.

I then made a new boot diskette, using a brand-new disk. Redhat told me install was successful, and to reboot. This was the moment of truth, If it worked-joy, if not-I would probably throw the linux disks in the trash. Thankfully it worked. KDE ran a wizard to set some preferences, then you're dumped to the desktop to do what you will. You may want to choose "windows" as a theme. I didn't, and it took a while to figure out the mouse actions (ie: single instead of double click to execute a program or open files). I ended up opening two of everything for the first bit.

You could probably spend weeks on end just customizing everything. I have not found anything that cannot be changed. You can choose from a menu of pre-done themes and styles, or you can create and save your own. There is a lot of serious eye candy here. If thats not your thing, you can make it totally plain-jane.

A lot of newbies feel apprehension about using a shell, but you can do almost anything without ever looking at a shell. There is a GUI for doing almost any task. However, I reccomend arming yourself with a good book and giving yourself a crash course. Do not do this as root. I used "Running Linux" by O'Reilley, and allthough it is a few years out of date, it has good background on anything you may need to do with your new linux system. You will find that doing certain tasks is a lot easier with the command line, so go at your own pace, but don't be afraid of it. I especially like the feature in "Konquerer" that allows you to graphically browse files, and the shell console follows you right along. Very neat.

Some tasks seem to be harder to figure out than they should be. For instance, I wanted to browse a CDrom, simple task right? It seems that drives other than the hard drives need to be manually mounted, and actually you can set them up to be auto-mounted, but that's another story. So I searched the docs, and finally found my answer. Type this at the prompt:

mount -t iso9660 /dev/cdrom /mnt/cdrom

of course the syntax may be different on your system, but basically it means "mount my cd rom which is of the iso9660 filesystem at /mnt/cdrom" you can then browse the CD navigating to of course "mnt/cdrom". You will also have to do this to access your floppy drive, and to access files on your windows drive if you have one. When you are done you type:

umount /mnt/cdrom

Make sure you navigate away from the cdrom or you will get a "disk in use" error. Get a book so you have a reference to the different filesystems, and the thousand other shell commands you will eventually be using.

I am not sure how much I like RPM packages yet. They are really easy to install, but they do not give you (or I just haven't discovered how) much flexibility of where or how you install. As I mentioned, I am a web developer, and Redhat installed my Apache, MySQL, and php software in seemingly random places. You can find missing software with the "locate" command, but be warned because you might get way more results than you anticipated, as this command returns every file and directory on your system with the same letter combination. If you know how to use regular expressions you can use them at the command line and filter your search a lot better.

I decided I wanted to install Apache, MySQl and php manually, first, because I wanted to make an exercise of it, and second, they were all around six months out of date, and being the techno junky that I am . . .

It was easy to remove the packages using the GUI Kpackage manager. A note: Keep your eyes out for dependencies. Linux and linux software uses a lot of shared libraries, so something may not work if you remove something else. Installing software from source is not so intuitive. Usually it involves three steps: ./configure, make, and make install. After a few bungled attempts I managed to get the newest versions of Apache, MySQL, and php to co-operate, and I installed them to a directory that made more sense to me. When you attempt this, always read the README or INSTALL files that come with software, as they will have the most up-to-date instructions that you will need.

I guess that's my story for now. My computer doesn't crash anymore, I have installed software from source code, I slink around the shell console using arcane commands, and I even tried recompiling the kernel to trash all the unneeded device drivers contained within, and I was successful, except that I trashed a few drivers I did need, C'est la Vie. My point is that I am a linux newbie, and I've only been at this a week. It has been very fun, and very rewarding. Linux forces you to really think about how computers work, where as windows tries to hide it from you.

I haven't figured everything out yet, for instance, I haven't been able to print anything but random nonsense, but I'm trying, and as I try I learn, and as I learn I realize what I was missing before, control over my computer, rather than the inverse. I am happy to say that I haven't booted into windows since I got my linux system online, because really, there hasn't been a point.

Thanks for your time,
Darren Kirby
 
Old 07-14-2003, 12:34 PM   #14
Artimus
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2003
Location: Wisconsin
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 188

Rep: Reputation: 30
About 2 years ago. I heard about Linux on Tech TV, had too much time on my hands, and a seperate 2GB harddrive with nothing on it. Order Mandrake 8.2 from Cheapbytes. After a few long hours on FreeNode, I got it working. Those were the days. Next, moved onto Slackware (I took out my entire system by accident there... Reinstalled it, and was amazed by all that Slack had to offer. It is still my favorite distro, even after checking out Debian, Gentoo, and even the BSD's (Though FreeBSD is getting closer to surpassing Slack)
 
Old 07-15-2003, 12:16 AM   #15
Dhimani
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: Oregon
Distribution: Mac OS X, SuSE 8.2
Posts: 186

Rep: Reputation: 30
The last PC I had before my current one was a Cyrix 6x86-150Mhz running Winblows 95, then I switched to Mac primarily because my wife was using one at work for graphic design and she needed something faster at home. I used Macs exclusively for 6 years, then Mac OS X came out, and that was so much better. Mac OS X is based on Unix, and that is what makes it so stable. Even Winblows XP can't match it for stability and ease of use. I figured that if Unix made the Mac OS much better, then I'd like to give Unix's cousin Linux a try. Only problem: I can't get the modem to work in SuSE 8.2 in my new Dell 4600. I installed a new one, but don't have enough of a programming background to figure out how to compile and install the driver (something about editing a "Makefile"--I'm using the wrong set of headers (/usr/include/linux/), but can't find the right ones under /lib/modules/. Anyway, I must've wiped out my hard drive about 3 times trying to install SuSE alongside XP, only to figure out that I need to reformat the drive as FAT32 instead of NTFS--go figure! My copy of SuSE didn't come with manuals or anything, so it was touch and go. As much as I hate to admit it, I still need XP (XP reminds me of a cheap imitation of Mac OS X)--in my town, there's no Mac software outlet (and whatever I find for Mac via mail-order is ALWAYS more expensive!), and I can't get online with my Dell yet in SuSE due to my modem problem <sigh>. I've got two ideas; one is to wait about 6 weeks for wireless internet to become available in my area and just forget about the freakin' modem, and the other is to see if anyone has any ideas that might help. One thing is for sure--I'm gonna have to get a Preferred Reader card at Waldenbooks (or something like that) for all the C++ programming and Linux books I'm gonna have to buy!
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
thread switch results in kernel stack switch superstition Linux - General 1 05-17-2005 11:48 PM
Fedora Core 3 Instalation Have Questions and I Share Experiences. sitmex Fedora - Installation 2 03-11-2005 01:04 AM
Newbies with old PCs unite and share your experiences stranger777 Linux - Newbie 2 08-18-2004 02:40 AM
set up DSL thru SWITCH - winXp connected to SWITCH too husz Linux - Newbie 5 04-22-2004 12:08 AM
The switch to kernel 2.6.0; any one want to share experiences qanopus LinuxQuestions.org Member Success Stories 8 01-02-2004 12:15 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Non-*NIX Forums > General

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:20 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration