LinuxQuestions.org
Latest LQ Deal: Latest LQ Deals
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Non-*NIX Forums > General
User Name
Password
General This forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 04-09-2006, 05:33 AM   #1
sirbijan
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Nov 2005
Location: Iran
Distribution: FC5 & Ubuntu Dapper Drake
Posts: 9

Rep: Reputation: 0
SATA vs. SCSI


I googled the term, but I mostly got advanced hardware jargons about'em, what's your idea? How much difference? Which one's better in which field? Wuddya prefer for your job and why? I just want you to talk about it if you wish, you're gonna teach me alot if you do!

thank you,
bijan
 
Old 04-09-2006, 05:40 AM   #2
davcefai
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2004
Location: Malta
Distribution: Debian Sid
Posts: 863

Rep: Reputation: 45
Given the ridiculously high price of SCSI drives I don't want to know about them! They are supposed to be more reliable than IDE drives, maybe they are but not that it shows.

Their speed advantage has been cancelled by SATA drives. Personally I'd go for SATA every time.

This is a very personal opinion.
 
Old 04-09-2006, 06:11 AM   #3
Mega Man X
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Apr 2003
Location: ~
Distribution: Ubuntu, FreeBSD, Solaris, DSL
Posts: 5,339

Rep: Reputation: 65
SATA:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SATA

SCSI:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SCSI

Well, I've a couple of Sparc machines at home that I can't make anything useful with because the SCSI drivers they have are too small and buying a new disk is way expensive for those old machines. I'd be so happy if I could put an IDE or SATA disk on them

Last edited by Mega Man X; 04-09-2006 at 12:36 PM.
 
Old 04-09-2006, 12:26 PM   #4
peter_89
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Distribution: Microsoft Windows XP Professional SP2; Slackware Linux 10.2
Posts: 215

Rep: Reputation: 30
Home users shouldn't bother with SCSI drives. They are made for high-end workstations and servers. Yes, they are fast, and yes, they are very powerful, but they also overheat very easily without a very well-ventilated case and given that most home users go for space over speed all of the money required for 30 gigabytes on a SCSI makes it not worth it.
I still use IDE. There are some lingering compatibility issues with SATA drives on some motherboards that I don't really want to deal with. I am planning to switch in 2-or-so years.

Last edited by peter_89; 04-09-2006 at 12:39 PM.
 
  


Reply

Tags
sata, scsi



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
no SATA when compiled directly (SATA on SCSI) evil_empire Linux - Hardware 5 02-13-2006 04:06 AM
sata vs scsi for a server xpucto Linux - General 13 12-01-2005 08:29 AM
SATA vs SCSI for old M/B svar Linux - Hardware 6 05-12-2005 11:57 PM
LILO Problems - SATA, SCSI Kalidor Linux - General 2 03-09-2004 11:31 AM
SCSI vs. SATA Joey.Dale Linux - Hardware 2 02-07-2004 12:16 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Non-*NIX Forums > General

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:50 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration