LinuxQuestions.org
Welcome to the most active Linux Forum on the web.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Non-*NIX Forums > General
User Name
Password
General This forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 01-11-2006, 08:32 AM   #1
Dragineez
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: Annapolis
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 278

Rep: Reputation: 41
OSS=P2P=Copyright Infringement?


Going to work this morning in downtown DC, I see an article headline in the Express - "Open Source Changing Course". I usually don't pick up the Express but I was interested in a mainstream article on Open Source Software. Turns out the entire article was about P2P file sharing networks, the law suit against Morpheus, and how various file sharing programs are being used to download copyrighted material. There was nothing - absolutely nothing - about the OSS initiative. There was also no mention whatever about how P2P file sharing networks can be used, and are being used, to download and distribute legitimate content. Every Linux distro I've downloaded has been through BitTorrent. All the HighRez Mars Lander pictures I use as wallpaper (and it's "wallpaper" not a "screensaver" - but that's another rant) I downloaded from NASA also using BitTorrent.

How did this perception of OSS equating to illegal file sharing arise in the "minds" (and I use the term loosely) of people in general? I've had people refer to me as a hacker. It's a moniker I would proudly wear, but I don't think I qualify having contributed only infinitesimally small chunks of code to the community. The mere fact that I use Linux paints me as a "hacker" in their minds.

Where does this idea come from and should we combat it?
 
Old 01-11-2006, 08:56 AM   #2
Winno
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2003
Location: Australia
Distribution: Fedora Core 3 / Mandrake 10.1 / Gentoo 2005.0
Posts: 100

Rep: Reputation: 15
I haven't read the article, nor do I have access to it, but from your words, the title of the article is an absolute misnomer. The author's mind probably jumped to something else as soon as he or she started writing it. Or the title was just randomly/inappropriately chosen. More likely however, is that he or she isn't well informed on open source. Illegal activity from music/movie sharing often steals the media spotlight.

Most (if not all) open source software allows you to copy and distribute it, as written in the licence. Even if it is copyrighted, the licence gives you permission to copy it.
 
Old 01-11-2006, 09:48 AM   #3
sundialsvcs
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: SE Tennessee, USA
Distribution: Gentoo, LFS
Posts: 10,659
Blog Entries: 4

Rep: Reputation: 3941Reputation: 3941Reputation: 3941Reputation: 3941Reputation: 3941Reputation: 3941Reputation: 3941Reputation: 3941Reputation: 3941Reputation: 3941Reputation: 3941
The practice, of "sharing" copyrighted material in violation of the copyright owner's permissions, is what is illegal. If you recorded a song off of your digital radio feed and placed the resulting file anywhere outside of your own home or office, you will have committed the same crime.

Equating "open source software" with "piracy" might be the pipe-dream of a struggling proprietary-software maker such as Microsoft .. and, yes, I now consider them to be 'struggling' ... or perhaps of a record-label who sees the death-knell for its chain of CD-stores and DVD-rental shops and knows it cannot stop the tide. But that's just wrong.

You cannot achieve security through obscurity. You cannot put the ocean back into a bottle. You cannot stop the tide. What you can do, is learn how to surf these great new waves.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
LXer: Visto sues Microsoft for sync patent infringement LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 12-15-2005 12:16 PM
Copyright Neoxeekhrobe General 16 08-30-2005 02:24 AM
MPlayer closed for software infringement? justintime32 Linux - General 2 03-29-2005 04:04 PM
Risk of Linux P2P vs. Windows P2P software snatale1 Linux - Software 2 12-04-2004 07:14 PM
Issue with snd-pcm-oss and snd-mixer-oss; OSS load failed EnigmaX Slackware 3 07-26-2004 03:26 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Non-*NIX Forums > General

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:29 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration