LinuxQuestions.org
Review your favorite Linux distribution.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Non-*NIX Forums > General
User Name
Password
General This forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 06-04-2016, 06:13 AM   #1
hazel
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Mar 2016
Location: Harrow, UK
Distribution: LFS, AntiX, Slackware
Posts: 7,573
Blog Entries: 19

Rep: Reputation: 4452Reputation: 4452Reputation: 4452Reputation: 4452Reputation: 4452Reputation: 4452Reputation: 4452Reputation: 4452Reputation: 4452Reputation: 4452Reputation: 4452
OpenWPM tracks the trackers


A team at Princeton have developed a web crawler called OpenWPM which visits popular sites and studies how they track users. In two weeks it went through the million top sites and found that many of them share the information they harvest.

Often the site asks your browser to perform a task behind your back. This allows your machine to be fingerprinted. They can check which fonts are installed or how audio is processed, even your battery level!

Protective apps like ghostery can block known trackers but not unknown ones. Open WPM makes the unknown known.
 
Old 06-06-2016, 08:59 PM   #2
sundialsvcs
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: SE Tennessee, USA
Distribution: Gentoo, LFS
Posts: 10,659
Blog Entries: 4

Rep: Reputation: 3941Reputation: 3941Reputation: 3941Reputation: 3941Reputation: 3941Reputation: 3941Reputation: 3941Reputation: 3941Reputation: 3941Reputation: 3941Reputation: 3941
I'm just waiting for the class-action lawsuits to start: "Count #1 of 3,143,205: client IP-address 123.124.125.126 ... Count #2 of 3,143,205 ..."

Technically and legally speaking, every IP-address that could be traced to "a United States individual," say, could be identified as a plaintiff. There could be millions of plaintiffs in that class ... and a jury might well decide to award each and every one of them $100,000.00 in damages.

Don't think that I am joking . . .

Right now, "you can get away with anything that you can dream-up to program," but only because "the public the plaintiffs do not yet know what is being done to them.

Don't suppose, merely because the lawsuits have not yet been filed, that they will not be.

In many, many ways, "our industry has been living on borrowed time." We should bear in mind that "none of this has ever existed before." That "it is less than 10 years(!) old." Yes, it takes a little bit of time for the judicial system to roll into action, but lawyers are the same around the world. They are always looking for a new, juicy, lucrative case . . .

And I, for one, will be perfectly candid in expressing the opinion that this has all become a very wretched and intrinsically-abusive situation(!), which badly needs to be tried. I'll gladly join every "class" that arrives in my (physical) mailbox, and hold out my hands waiting for the cash to start falling down from heaven. If Google, Facebook, etc. get hit with a $100 billion judgment, I'm quite sure they can find a way to pay it, and hey, I need a new addition on my house . . . They never asked me for permission when they damaged me, and I therefore feel no compulsion to ask them for permission to get my cash.

Quote:
Didn't you know that the "Internet advertisement" that you hosted on your site on May 3, 2015 contained malware that damaged me? Well, "I, and 100,000 of my closest friends," now declare to the Honorable Court that "you knew, or should have known, and in any case that you were negligent in allowing this software to be distributed on or by your web-site." Although you did not originate the malware, I assert that you were a party ... and, since the dollar-cost of our class action is well over $500 million dollars, you'd better settle ...
Quote:
Over the past fifteen years, you helped to produce 200 web-sites. Now that all of them have been successfully found to be "members of the class," they are suing you for failing to inform them at the time of the potential liability. Yeah, even though you're just a single jock who practices his trade in a Starbucks, you now face 200 lawsuits from angry clients plaintiffs who want to stick their enormous losses (and liability) on you. Your attorney advises the immediate purchase of liability insurance, with premiums of $170,000 a year ...
"It's coming, folks. "It's coming!"

"No one" has y-e-t been paying attention to what we do. Are we seriously prepared for the repercussions ... when they begin?

(Heh ...) We should be!

Everyone who "puts something into a box and sells it to the public" constantly faces the reality of being sued ... and steers their way through a phalanx of laws designed specifically to protect the public. Everyone, so far, except us!

Be prepared, folks. Those days are over. Forever.

Last edited by sundialsvcs; 06-06-2016 at 09:20 PM.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[SOLVED] Transmission: Block trackers? Steve W Linux - Software 2 12-18-2012 04:16 AM
[SOLVED] Trackers here at LQ. Knightron LQ Suggestions & Feedback 10 10-16-2012 07:19 PM
Torrent site with a list of trackers. stf92 General 2 07-25-2012 03:14 AM
blocking bittorrent trackers r0b0 Linux - Networking 2 04-27-2010 01:32 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Non-*NIX Forums > General

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:42 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration