GeneralThis forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I heard the new Brita filters will filter out all the stupid juice potions that one might use to demoralize his enemy
Yeah, grip is cool. There is probably even a one stepper available for winbloze, but it's been a while and I only did the mp3 thing on there, so I can't really help there. But for mp3's I used to use musicmatch. They might support oggs, but I don't know for sure.
I'm not sure if this'd work... download the OGG plugins for WinAmp and 'save to disk' any file that you play! I've not tried it, so I can't vouch for it's plausability as an option. Just a thought.
Thymox, yes yes, I've used this many times. It was actaully standard practice for my friends and I before we discovered nero (back in the windows days).
For my Ogg-Vorbis problem, i found solutions for both. Rip data to exact spec as wav then use the ogg-vorbis encoder from there site. I'm reripping all my CD's to 320Kbps for best quality
Tho the encoder says you'll get best quality using there default Variable Bitrate settings, wouldn't Constant bitrate be better or shall i say more 'accurate'?
I guess it depends on how good your hearing is. AFIAK, the variable setting allows you to have a low quality setting on the parts of the music where you'd not notice it (such as 'silent' pauses or simple drum loops) and high (>320?) for the parts that are more 'busy' and are therefore more likely to sound bad with low qualities. So, overall, what you would gain by using variable quality, by this reckoning, would depend on the music... I think
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.