LinuxQuestions.org
Visit Jeremy's Blog.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Non-*NIX Forums > General
User Name
Password
General This forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!

Notices



Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 12-10-2002, 11:47 AM   #1
awdoyle
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2002
Location: Portland, OR
Distribution: Xubuntu
Posts: 135

Rep: Reputation: 15
MS strategy shift


Anybody seen this one yet?
http://www.cnn.com/2002/TECH/biztech...eut/index.html

Andrew
 
Old 12-10-2002, 01:11 PM   #2
Edward78
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2002
Distribution: OpenSuSE 11
Posts: 441

Rep: Reputation: 30
Hehe well it is on the cnn site, so it is true. Is MS finally learning their lesson? Will this be the first blue screen on linux?

Find out on the next, Microsoft blue screen empire.
 
Old 12-10-2002, 01:15 PM   #3
Thymox
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2001
Location: Cornwall, England.
Distribution: Debian + Ubuntu
Posts: 4,345

Rep: Reputation: 57
Quote:
Microsoft... is facing a growing threat from the open source software standard as it gains share in the corporate server market used to manage networks and data. META Group predicted that Linux will be used on nearly half of new servers by 2007, up from its current share of 15 to 20 percent, making it difficult for Microsoft to ignore Linux as a platform for its database, Web hosting and e-mail server applications.
Sure, Linux only has 15-20% market share, but Linux ain't the only open source server OS, now, is it?
Quote:
Instead, Microsoft has stressed that its software is more affordable when considering the total cost of using Linux, including ongoing personnel and administration costs.
Back to that old gem?

Last edited by Thymox; 12-10-2002 at 01:21 PM.
 
Old 12-10-2002, 07:04 PM   #4
sharper
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2002
Location: MN USA
Distribution: slakware 9.0
Posts: 121

Rep: Reputation: 15
Quick! Have somebody copyright these two sites and names

http://www.mslinux.org/

http://www.tuxfiles.org/antihelp/linux-xp.html

What scares me about this is I found a site where somebody was actually working on a distro called LinuxXP
 
Old 12-10-2002, 07:22 PM   #5
chrismiceli
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2002
Posts: 349

Rep: Reputation: 31
Quote:
A recent Microsoft-sponsored study by researcher IDC concluded that servers based on Microsoft's Windows 2000 were cheaper to own and operate when used for networking, storing and sharing files, printing and security, while Linux servers were cheaper to operate when used for Web hosting
HOW DO THEY FIGURE THAT ONE OUT, OH YEAH, LOOK AT THE BOLD
 
Old 12-10-2002, 07:28 PM   #6
Thymox
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2001
Location: Cornwall, England.
Distribution: Debian + Ubuntu
Posts: 4,345

Rep: Reputation: 57
And sooner or later we're gonna have these, too:

http://www.conectevil.com/
http://www.lesbian.mine.nu/
http://www.deadrat.za.net/
 
Old 12-10-2002, 07:29 PM   #7
php
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2001
Location: USA
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 825

Rep: Reputation: 30
This is a microsoft forum?
 
Old 12-10-2002, 07:51 PM   #8
trickykid
Guru
 
Registered: Jan 2001
Posts: 24,133

Rep: Reputation: 199Reputation: 199
Quote:
Originally posted by hackers_
This is a microsoft forum?
Nope, one reason why I moved it out of the Linux - General forum and into the General forum.
 
Old 12-10-2002, 11:11 PM   #9
KnightAbel
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2002
Location: Kaysville, UT USA
Distribution: Red Hat Linux, Slackware
Posts: 242

Rep: Reputation: 30
so how do they figure that cost to run linux is more over the long run that microsoft?

hmm... hardware more expensive? nope, that's not it.
upgrades cost alot? nope, that ain't it either.
Wears out hardware fast? well, I don't know about that, but I'd say no to that as well
Not portable to multilpe architectures? oh wait, that's Windows..

I'm running out of options here.
 
Old 12-10-2002, 11:56 PM   #10
neo77777
LQ Addict
 
Registered: Dec 2001
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Distribution: *NIX
Posts: 3,704

Rep: Reputation: 55
Damn I like this one:
Quote:
A recent Microsoft-sponsored study by researcher IDC concluded that servers based on Microsoft's Windows 2000 were cheaper to own and operate when used for networking, storing and sharing files, printing and security, while Linux servers were cheaper to operate when used for Web hosting.
How about an insert from New York Times' "Beginner's Guide to Linux" published on December 5, 2002:
Quote:
McCarty: I’ve studied economics. In fact, I’ve taught it. So I can’t agree that anything is free. The initial cost of Linux is zero or near zero. But the total cost of ownership—which is much harder to measure—is non-zero.

Books, training, support, and time lost in figuring out an unfamiliar program all entail costs. Some argue that the total cost of ownership of Linux systems is less than that of Microsoft systems. Others argue the opposite. As I see it, a great deal depends on which system you prefer and which system you’re familiar with. I use Linux systems on the desktop and in the server rack and I’m convinced that, by doing so, I’ve minimized my total cost of ownership. But, others may experience different mileage results. I don’t quibble with them.
And I share Mr.McCarty's point.
 
Old 12-11-2002, 05:09 AM   #11
Thymox
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2001
Location: Cornwall, England.
Distribution: Debian + Ubuntu
Posts: 4,345

Rep: Reputation: 57
Quote:
Originally posted by KnightAbel
so how do they figure that cost to run linux is more over the long run that Microsoft?
One of the things they say is that it'll cost lots of money to retrain people to use Linux... because it is just that hard ::sarcasm::! And one that I'll throw in of my own: If you're running with a Windows system at work, you can employ MCSE/MCSAs to deal with all of your finickey problems (by reinstalling - wonderful isn't it?). If you run with Linux at work, you can employ people who actually know what they're doing, and therefore they cost more to employ... so it is more cost efficient to employ 2 monkeys that know how to install Windows. Of course, that doesn't take into account the cost of the OS in the first place...

Last edited by Thymox; 12-11-2002 at 11:31 AM.
 
Old 12-11-2002, 07:21 AM   #12
zLinuxz
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2002
Location: Shanghai, CHINA
Distribution: RH 5.0,5.1 6.0,6.1 7.0,7.1,7.2,7.3.,8.0,9.0, RH Enterprise, Fedora C1, C2
Posts: 1,216

Rep: Reputation: 45
Thymox, that perhaps may be true. However, such as Linux is a "new" and a OS that is beginning to take off and become popular, it is also the "new" people studying computer science, and computer related subject that will begin to be trained in Linux..and not necessarily in Windows. So, in countries where their computer industry is very under-developed, but which are beginning to pick up...like for example Mexico and China, they are training all their technicians in Linux, and not in Windows. It is expensive if you have to switch from one to the other one...but if you start from scratch, like these countries, then it must be, that in the Long run, it is way, way, way cheaper than runing Windows. because there is no switching costs, .
 
Old 12-11-2002, 11:31 AM   #13
Thymox
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2001
Location: Cornwall, England.
Distribution: Debian + Ubuntu
Posts: 4,345

Rep: Reputation: 57
Hey, I wasn't disagreeing. I was playing devil's advocate... stating what I believe Microsoft believes... if that makes sense. Tell you what, I'll put a little ::sarcasm:: in my post to make sure that no-one else might get confused as to my beliefs.
 
Old 12-11-2002, 01:36 PM   #14
zLinuxz
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2002
Location: Shanghai, CHINA
Distribution: RH 5.0,5.1 6.0,6.1 7.0,7.1,7.2,7.3.,8.0,9.0, RH Enterprise, Fedora C1, C2
Posts: 1,216

Rep: Reputation: 45
oh no!, I know you weren't disagreeing!, , sorry if I made it sound like otherwise!

I was just pointing it out...for that's what the site suggests....not you of course.

LOL, I was watching that DVD yesterday when I made Mplayer run!!, lol, maybe we were watching the movie at the same time, and we didn't even know!, heheh,
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Your upgrade strategy? shazam75 Linux - General 2 12-04-2004 06:24 PM
Update strategy hypernetics Linux - General 3 05-29-2004 01:29 PM
Recommend a strategy gmartin Linux - Networking 3 04-29-2004 12:22 AM
Backup strategy Swift&Smart Linux - General 3 04-17-2003 04:07 AM
Partitionning strategy Dweezil Linux - Software 3 04-25-2001 11:22 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:49 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration