Man Tries To Bite Fitbit Stock, Ends Up in the Dock
GeneralThis forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Man Tries To Bite Fitbit Stock, Ends Up in the Dock
My local rag reports on a two-bit stock manipulator who got caught. I think you all might find it interesting because computer forensics played a role in tracking him down. Although the description of the computer forensics is not technical, it is a bit more detailed then normally seen in a newspaper.
The mope was trying to cause Fitbit stock to spike so he could cash in on some options.
One wonders why the SEC immediately accepted the statement, and posted it as though it were genuine.
Did anyone, at SEC or elsewhere, even make any [international] phone-calls to the alleged buyer before publishing to the trade press that someone planned to buy the company?
Sure, this scam was easy to catch, but it also appears to me to have been much too easy to initiate, and it went too far without proper "due diligence."
I suspect the SEC gets so many documents is likely so understaffed and dysfunctional that it tends to accept them if they look correct. Clearly this guy did his homework.
A more compelling observation is that the small fry get caught and charged and big fry get to retire with bonuses.
Last edited by frankbell; 06-01-2017 at 09:37 PM.
Reason: clarity
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.