GeneralThis forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
It's about time. I think the good people of Los Angeles have been for too long oppressed by silly string. I'm glad our civic leaders are finally stepping up and freeing us from the bondage imposed by compressed foam products.
still its rather a stupid idea, how do they expect people to fix the hard drives if they get messed if the people fixing the drives cant figure out what the jumpers mean!
i wonder if LA would be willing to ban windows for its master/slave attitude .. and also ban linux for its master / slave attitude ,,,... oh, and don't forget, you have to ban TV also for its master / slave attitude, along with all computers, even cd-players., cars,.. and anything else that tells, or needed to be used by someone or something
SoCal is not nearly as insane as NoCal, where you cannot own pets. Instead, if a canine or feline happens to share your living space, you are instead an "animal guardian", because being a "pet owner" apparently is discriminatory and would oppressively subjugate our four-footed friends. - Sheesh!!! - J.W.
Distribution: Fedora, Debian, OpenSuSE and Android
Posts: 1,820
Rep:
The big-brother trend is spreading. The morons in my city council just passed an ordinance making it a crime for anyone (of any age) to use any vehicle containing wheels, including bicycles, skateboards, roller-skates, lawn-mowers, without the use of a helmet.
And in another brilliant decision, last week they passed a city ordinance against being homeless in the city of Spokane. If the police find you homeless on the streets of Spokane, they will fine you or arrest you.
NOTE TO BUSINESS LEADERS: If you are looking at Spokane as an option. Move along, there is nothing to see here.
Originally posted by Pcghost The big-brother trend is spreading. The morons in my city council just passed an ordinance making it a crime for anyone (of any age) to use any vehicle containing wheels, including bicycles, skateboards, roller-skates, lawn-mowers, without the use of a helmet.
And in another brilliant decision, last week they passed a city ordinance against being homeless in the city of Spokane. If the police find you homeless on the streets of Spokane, they will fine you or arrest you.
that is crazy. an adult can't ride a lawnmower without a helmet?!? well, can only blame the people for accepting these ridiculous laws.
Bradley, 44, of Auburn Road, pleaded guilty to reckless conduct in connection with the case and the Londonderry police dropped the charge of driving while intoxicated. He was riding a bicycle after losing his license on a previous drunken-driving case in Massachusetts. He insisted he was not drunk. When he refused to take a sobriety test, police took him into custody and charged him with DWI, which for a second offense carried a penalty up to a year in jail, a $2,000 fine, and extended loss of driving privileges.
As far as driving while intoxicated prohibitions go, the bill would also exempt wheelchairs from the definition of "motor vehicle."
At least eight states have determined that drunk cycling falls within their drunk driving statutes: California, Florida, Hawaii, New Jersey, Ohio, Oregon and Pennsylvania. Only a few have said the opposite including Washington State, Illinois and Louisiana.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.