| General This forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun! |
| Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
 |
GNU/Linux Basic Guide
This 255-page guide will provide you with the keys to understand the philosophy of free software, teach you how to use and handle it, and give you the tools required to move easily in the world of GNU/Linux. Many users and administrators will be taking their first steps with this GNU/Linux Basic guide and it will show you how to approach and solve the problems you encounter.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free. |
|
 |
11-04-2004, 04:08 AM
|
#1
|
|
Member
Registered: Oct 2002
Location: Ayrshire, Scotland
Distribution: Suse(home) RHEL (Work)
Posts: 262
Rep:
|
How do you calculate (manually) 2 to the power 3.5?
Ok - brain getting rusty here.
2^2 = 2 x 2 = 4
2^3 = 2 x 2 x 2 = 8
2^4 = 2 x 2 x 2 x 2 = 16
etc.
How do I calculate 2^3.5? Don't need to know for any reason; it just started bugging me...!
Dave
|
|
|
|
11-04-2004, 04:18 AM
|
#2
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,142
Rep: 
|
We were taught how to do this at school.
Apparently the only way to calculate the above is to use calculus. I forget the exact method, but somebody more in touch with Mathematics might be able to help you.
|
|
|
|
11-04-2004, 04:25 AM
|
#3
|
|
Member
Registered: Oct 2002
Location: Ayrshire, Scotland
Distribution: Suse(home) RHEL (Work)
Posts: 262
Original Poster
Rep:
|
I'll maybe do a little research then; it seems like something that should be easy to work out...
Dave
|
|
|
|
11-04-2004, 05:22 AM
|
#4
|
|
Newbie
Registered: Oct 2003
Posts: 0
Rep:
|
2^(3.5) = 2^(7*0.5) = (2^7)^(0.5) = 128^(0.5) = sqrt(128) = sqrt(64*2) = sqrt(64)*sqrt(2)
= 8 * sqrt(2)
|
|
|
|
11-04-2004, 05:51 AM
|
#5
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,142
Rep: 
|
Quote:
Originally posted by bakery2k
2^(3.5) = 2^(7*0.5) = (2^7)^(0.5) = 128^(0.5) = sqrt(128) = sqrt(64*2) = sqrt(64)*sqrt(2)
= 8 * sqrt(2)
|
Perfect mate! You got it. I was just thinking about it and was about to post this simple solution when I saw that somebody had beaten me to it. Thanks...
|
|
|
|
11-05-2004, 01:25 AM
|
#6
|
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Aug 2004
Distribution: Ubuntu Gutsy Gibbon
Posts: 25
Rep:
|
Or slightly different: 2^(7/2) = 2^(7*1/2) = (2^7)^(1/2) = sqrt (128) = sqrt (64*2) = 8 sqrt 2
Only minor difference ;-)
|
|
|
|
11-05-2004, 02:00 AM
|
#7
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Jun 2003
Location: California
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 1,178
Rep:
|
Blast this finding threads too late to contribute anything extra
Nicely done, gents
|
|
|
|
11-05-2004, 02:10 AM
|
#8
|
|
Member
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Distribution: Slackware, Debian, Gentoo, openSuSE
Posts: 357
Rep:
|
Much easier by addition of exponents. Since (a^x)*(a^y) = a^(x+y),
2^(3.5)=(2^3)*(2^.5), or 8*Sqrt[2]. Same concept as above, just using addition rule instead of multiplication rule. Sorry, I had to post, I'm a math nut. 
|
|
|
|
11-05-2004, 02:24 AM
|
#9
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: hopefully not here
Distribution: Gentoo
Posts: 2,038
Rep:
|
Quote:
2^(3.5) = 2^(7*0.5) = (2^7)^(0.5) = 128^(0.5) = sqrt(128) = sqrt(64*2) = sqrt(64)*sqrt(2)
= 8 * sqrt(2)
|
... umm, since i never look calculus I'm a bit behind here .. but what happened to the "0.5" .. suddenly it vanished into 128 without doing a thing... i say the answer seems more like 12 if you count half's
|
|
|
|
11-05-2004, 02:37 AM
|
#10
|
|
Member
Registered: Jun 2004
Location: Kalifornia
Distribution: YOPER+KDE
Posts: 263
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Harishankar
Perfect mate! You got it. I was just thinking about it and was about to post this simple solution when I saw that somebody had beaten me to it. Thanks...
|
simple???
<---needs to take calculus.
|
|
|
|
11-05-2004, 02:56 AM
|
#11
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,142
Rep: 
|
The above is not the calculus method, everybody. It's simple math  The calculus method is much tougher and is used by students specifically studying calculus. Not used by people who just want the answer.
Explanation
2^{3.5} = 2^{7 * 0.5} = (2^7)^{0.5) = 128^{0.5} (because 2 x 2 x 2 x 2 x 2 x 2 x 2 = 128)
Those who want the answer quickly usually use a calculator, not calculus
Sqrt is another way of saying square root which is same as raised to the power half.
x^{0.5) = sqrt{x}
|
|
|
|
11-05-2004, 11:22 AM
|
#12
|
|
Member
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Distribution: Slackware, Debian, Gentoo, openSuSE
Posts: 357
Rep:
|
What would the caculus method be? It seems like a basic algebra question regarding exponent rules... unless you want to find an approximation. Then maybe you could set up the continued fractions to approximate Sqrt[2], which still seems like an algebra problem, unless you consider some sort of limiting situation...which isn't really going to help since Sqrt[2] is irrational.
Hmm...maybe I missed the calculus of exponents. Who knows...
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:21 AM.
|
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|