LinuxQuestions.org
Review your favorite Linux distribution.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Non-*NIX Forums > General
User Name
Password
General This forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 07-28-2004, 07:55 AM   #1
Zacharias
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jul 2004
Location: Europe/Austria/Vienna
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 5

Rep: Reputation: 0
Question Hardware-specs in signature? Why?


I am just wondering why people put the specifications of their hardware into their signatures.

Why do people do that?

Does it make any difference to a "mplayer won't compile"-problem? Or is it just a status symbol? (In that case, of course, nearly ALL of you could go to hell, for I am owning a dual-CPU system )

Why do people show us CPU-frequencies? Or sizes of RAM? It doesn't make any difference that would be of greater importance. Also, a fast CPU (or two fast CPUs ) don't make a good computer. A bad mainboard burns much performance of a CPU, a bad power supply may burn the CPU itself And why do people show us their graphics cards? I know some people owning a Superdruber3D-II or so, and use those nifty 14"-Monitors... E.g. for gambling, where is the difference if I play tuxracer on a 500Mhz or a 2.5GHz-CPU? Also, harddrives are a very much limiting factor, if you got an IDE-disk, forget it, SCSI is much faster. And so on and so on.

But you won't find such specs. You'll always find: Graphics card, CPU, RAM. But why?

Last edited by Zacharias; 07-28-2004 at 07:57 AM.
 
Old 07-28-2004, 08:06 AM   #2
The Bad Penny
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Distribution: Slackware 10
Posts: 78

Rep: Reputation: 15
My thoughts are that, should they need to post a hardware related question then they wont need to keep posting specs.
There is also it lets other members and beginners know which hardware runs under Linux.
(Although we have the HCL for that now)
And of course there is always simply just to show off,, but Im guessing its the above 2.

Last edited by The Bad Penny; 07-28-2004 at 08:07 AM.
 
Old 07-28-2004, 08:06 AM   #3
RoboGeek
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Distribution: P.H.L.A.K.
Posts: 25

Rep: Reputation: 15
I like to brag about my state of the art 233 with 128 megs of ram....
 
Old 07-28-2004, 08:08 AM   #4
qwijibow
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Apr 2003
Location: nottingham england
Distribution: Gentoo
Posts: 2,672

Rep: Reputation: 47
i have a 1.3ghz athlon 256kb cache
and 512megs of DDR ram..
and a 6 gig hard disk..
and..
and..
and a 100Mbit net card....
and ..
and.. lol, im joking.

its almost useless.
sometimes it is needed.

for example, if some idiot wants to know why Ut2004 doesnt work, and they have not read the documentation, you can smite them down if there hardware specs say somthing like "product xyz graphics chip" cos we all read the documentation, and we all know how hardware specific ut is right ? no ? well.. okay, i did :P
 
Old 07-28-2004, 03:14 PM   #5
trey85stang
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,091

Rep: Reputation: 41
who cares? dont read if you dont like it.. I would of asked the question this way though.. why do people use signatures anyways?
 
Old 07-28-2004, 06:25 PM   #6
MikeZila
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2004
Location: Parts Unknown
Distribution: Arch
Posts: 377

Rep: Reputation: 30
Having your hardware specs in your signature makes answering questions a millions times easier on the people trying to help you. It saves you from having to waste posts giving out your hardware specs, too. I can't count how many times I've typed out my entire system config; its just easier to have it available to whoever reads your posts, rather than having to hand it out a thread-by-thread basis.

I used to hate it when people posted their hardware specs in their sigs, I used to think: "Showboating bastards." I'm sensing that you've got a similar disposition.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Hardware Specs ToothlessRebel Linux - Newbie 9 10-26-2008 08:06 AM
Hardware Specs ToothlessRebel Linux - Hardware 3 06-30-2004 07:01 PM
AMD FX 51 or 53 / hardware specs... RedUcer Linux - Hardware 0 04-01-2004 06:09 AM
how to tell specs of hardware installed? clockworks Linux - Hardware 4 12-12-2003 11:44 AM
Hardware Specs X11 LQ Suggestions & Feedback 7 04-03-2002 03:26 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Non-*NIX Forums > General

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:49 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration